This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zrdragon12 (talk | contribs) at 22:45, 9 October 2012 (new section on Nguyen1310). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:45, 9 October 2012 by Zrdragon12 (talk | contribs) (new section on Nguyen1310)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Here for any inquires.
Harassment
If you are being harassed by another editor, which you are, and they have been warned, please avoid making it worse by responding by repeatedly communicating with them, challenging their edits, or whatever. Focus on making contributions to our project. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am going to take your advice from now on. Cheers.Zrdragon12 (talk) 12:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
October 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:30, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Very fair yet again. I am starting to like you as a moderator/admin. Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Really? I was actually being honest but s your brought up TTAAC he has been edit waring as well.Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- See, comments like this... they give me a bad feeling that I've been suckered somehow. Later tonight I'll look and see if I've missed something, and should lift TTAAC's block. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Nguyen1310
If you are going to go to User:TheTimesAreAChanging talk page and rant about me deleting your unsourced material then at least be honest and link to the whole section of edits and not just the last one while cutting out the other 4 so as to claim dishonestly that I just deleted your stuff.Edits,all of them. It is perfectly clear why your piece and sources were deleted as I explained on the talk page section I started. Your first source was from examiner.com and when I added the reflist because you forgot to put one in so your sources did not show up,wikipedia stated that it was blacklisted so I removed it. Your 3 other sources are backpacker reviews from lonely planet forum,trip advisor reviews and a piece on about.com written by a back packer,they are not reputable sources. Therefore your piece was unsourced and I removed it. You have now reverted two editors who have removed your piece and you are edit waring yet again.Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)