This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CoolKatt number 99999 (talk | contribs) at 01:02, 25 June 2006 (→[] (currently a redirect to []).). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:02, 25 June 2006 by CoolKatt number 99999 (talk | contribs) (→[] (currently a redirect to []).)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)June 23 2006
Cultural references in Pokémon (currently a redirect to Pokémon (anime)).
I request the article be restored to before the last AfD. There are lots of similar articles, that are good enough to be kept. I will find people who are willing to improve the page vastly, so that it could be more notable in the eyes of many users. CoolKatt number 99999 02:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion Very strong consensus in AFD for deletion. Nomination above was raised in the AFD and responded to (negatively) by multiple other participants. Prior AFDs were properly mentioned and linked in at the top. GRBerry 04:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion I voted keep on the AfD, but it was deleted by policy, and I don't see any reason to overturn it. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, very strong deletion. Will (message me!) 10:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse, the correct procedure was followed and no new information has come to light. - Motor (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse - This should be, at most, a footnote in the main Pokémon article. --Improv 13:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion, valid per process and absolutely the correct decision per policy. Just zis Guy you know? 21:24, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse. "There are lots of similar articles" is never a valid argument. User:Zoe| 22:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
- Endorse deletion per original consensus. Valid deletion per process. --Coredesat 00:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- I am starting to suspect that Sockpuppets were involved. CoolKatt number 99999 01:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)