This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Richwales (talk | contribs) at 05:57, 1 January 2015 (Archiving case from Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Riza1234). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:57, 1 January 2015 by Richwales (talk | contribs) (Archiving case from Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Riza1234)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Riza1234
Riza1234 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
28 December 2014
- Suspected sockpuppets
- ZuleicaWilson (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
and are similar. The edits are also similar Unikalinho (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- The behavior is almost exactly the same, so I've blocked the sock. I also increased the master account's block to indefinite, given the two most recent block evasions. Mike V • Talk 16:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)