This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 60.242.36.89 (talk) at 08:34, 14 January 2015 (→User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:34, 14 January 2015 by 60.242.36.89 (talk) (→User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:B9 hummingbird hovering/Thoughtform
WP:STALEDRAFT for 6 years Magioladitis (talk) 07:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
- what reasons has the page been nominated for deletion? Tulpa and Thoughtform are in reputable literature and that which is otherwise. If an article has citations it fulfills the criterion. If the entries are found in peer reviewed journals then they are encyclopedic. What is the contention except an ill informed value judgement as to their merit or otherwise? Ask a reputable reference librarian at a library/institution of merit if required to find reputable information. Blessings Beauford 60.242.36.89 (talk) 08:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)