This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MDP23 (talk | contribs) at 17:36, 20 July 2006 (reinstate votes deleted - rather than removing votes from new users, please leave a comment on the afd page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:36, 20 July 2006 by MDP23 (talk | contribs) (reinstate votes deleted - rather than removing votes from new users, please leave a comment on the afd page.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Battle Field 2
Dispute on talk page as to whether the page should be merged in Battlefield 2 or just deleted. The article is badly written, contains virtually no information already included in Battlefield 2 and should be deleted, judging by the poor quality of its contents and the lack of useful info. Martinp23 20:22, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge any worthwile content (I'm not sure that there is) then Redirect WilyD 20:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just plain Delete. Artw 22:24, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- redirect probable search term. Not really seeing anything worth merging. --Pboyd04 23:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete "battle field 2", everything mentioned in original is alot better--General Oumrov 14:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge this page should be merged it has valuable contrabutions and a vandal delted the icon for it to be merged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunter91 (talk • contribs)
- Comment I removed the merge template replacing it with an AfD, as with an afd the decision can be merge. As I wrote in my nom, there was a lack of consensus on the talk page which is why I took the steps which I have done. Martinp23 15:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Battlefield 2, or just Delete. JD 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete This page is useless and has a much better predessor. --Dev Alahan 14:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)