This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Epeefleche (talk | contribs) at 23:35, 28 February 2015 (Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on List of University of Westminster alumni. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:35, 28 February 2015 by Epeefleche (talk | contribs) (Final warning: Removal of content, blanking on List of University of Westminster alumni. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)3RR
You have violated the 3RR restriction with your unexplained revert on List of University of Westminster alumni I suggest you undo that last edit, or I will report you. I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- You might want to review WP:3RR. Warren (talk) 17:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Warren, thanks for the link. I wasn't aware of the 3RR rule, but nevertheless, the university's web page is being damaged by these insistent edits to include reference to Emwazi. Tron reboot (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- Now that you are aware of it, you should revert you last edit on that page, and you may be able to avoid being blocked, per this report . — Preceding unsigned comment added by I invented "it's not you, it's me" (talk • contribs) 21:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Salapatas
Hello Tron reboot,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nick Salapatas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have contested the deletion, and given my reasons for contesting it. Is there something specific I missed in terms of content that would make it clearer why the entry is notable? Thanks. Tron reboot (talk) 17:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked for edit warring
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages, as you did at List of University of Westminster alumni. Your edit summary rationale was unavailing. And you defied talk page consensus. Epeefleche (talk) 23:35, 28 February 2015 (UTC)