This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yiğitcank (talk | contribs) at 19:22, 27 June 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:22, 27 June 2020 by Yiğitcank (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Raging Stallion Studios
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Raging Stallion Studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The sources do not prove any notability. I did some research myself and spite the company name comes out a lot (it's a company in the show business after all) I couldn't find any independent, extended, in-depth, secondary source which is what it is needed to establish notability. AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 09:32, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Shellwood (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails WP:NCORP with only trivial mentions by independent reliable secondary sources. Porn trade press consists of repackaged press releases and routine announcements. Porn or mainstream, industry awards count for little, if anything, towards WP:CORPDEPTH requirements. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. There's coverage from Instinct about when the studio decided to go bareback; Out News about incorporating a MAGA hat in a film; Hornet about the release of a controversial film; and others. XBIZ has tons of articles on the studio. PinkNews called the studio a "major studio" and "high profile". Vice called the studio "one of America's biggest producers of gay porn". I think there's definitely enough to support a short article. --Kbabej (talk) 17:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
@Kbabej: none of these is an article about raging stallion, they are all article about people who work for raging stallion and incidental mention of the studio.--AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:52, 27 June 2020 (UTC)- Did you even look at the articles? The Instinct, Out, and Hornet articles are solely about the studio. ?? --Kbabej (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Kbabej: for "instinct" you are right actually, is "Hornet" a blog?. anyhow, those sources are either focused only on the fact that the company is doing bare back movies or are mentions. not an extended, in-depth cover as required in WP:CORPDEPTH --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- I fixed the link. Sorry about that. Hornet is a news site, and has bylines. As for the mentions, they describe the subject well. But the first three articles are in depth in RS. --Kbabej (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Kbabej: for "instinct" you are right actually, is "Hornet" a blog?. anyhow, those sources are either focused only on the fact that the company is doing bare back movies or are mentions. not an extended, in-depth cover as required in WP:CORPDEPTH --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 18:58, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Did you even look at the articles? The Instinct, Out, and Hornet articles are solely about the studio. ?? --Kbabej (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Keep as per Kbabej--Yiğitcank (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)