Talk:Anna Laetitia Barbauld

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) at 14:55, 14 March 2021 (messed up). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:55, 14 March 2021 by SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) (messed up)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anna Laetitia Barbauld article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Anna Laetitia Barbauld is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

[REDACTED]

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 9, 2010.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 12, 2007	Peer review	Reviewed
February 14, 2007	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
February 22, 2007	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 20, 2017, March 9, 2018, and June 20, 2018.
Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Children's literature High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks you can do:

Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks.

Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles.
Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{WikiProject Children's literature}}
Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project.
Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Deletion discussions: listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature
Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject.
References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs.
Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature
Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

edit

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Poetry Mid‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Vital article

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Murphy, Olivia (2013). "Anna Letitia Barbauld: New Perspectives". Bucknell University Press. Retrieved 2021-03-14. That this is not a rare oversight but rather the voice of 'collective wisdom' on Barbauld is underscored by Misplaced Pages, which in its lengthy entry on her states that 'her career as a poet ended abruptly in 1812'.

Wrong chemistry reference

in “A Tea Lecture” the child learns that tea-making is “properly an operation of chemistry” and lessons on diffusion, evaporation, and condensation follow. Molecular diffusion was only discovered in the 1830s to 50s. I would be quite interested to read the original passage - is it short enough to type in here ? -- Marie Poise (talk) 11:35, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Here is the excerpt:

Tut. Solution is when a solid put into a fluid entirely disappears in it, leaving the liquor clear. Thus when I throw this lump of sugar into my tea, you see it gradually wastes away till it is all gone; and then I can taste it in every single drop of my tea; but the tea is clear as before.

Pup. Salt would do the same.

Tut. It would. But if I were to throw in a lump of chalk, it would lie undissolved at the bottom.

Pup. But it would make the water white.

Tut. True, while it was stirred; and then it would be a diffusion. But while the chalk was thus mixed with the liquor, it would lose its transparency, and not recover it again, till by standing the chalk had all subsided, and left the liquor as it was before.

Pup. How is the cream mixed with the tea?

Tut. Why, that is only diffused, for it takes away the transparency of the tea. But the particles of cream being finer and lighter than those of chalk, it remains longer united with the liquor. However, in time the cream would separate too, and rise to the top, leaving the tea clear...."

The reason I used the word "diffusion" in the article is because it was used in the text. Do you think it is misleading? Awadewit (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, Awadewit. Nice reading. Maybe, it would even be worth inserting such an example of here writing into the main text. As for "diffusion" and "diffused", it's not molecular diffusion nor any other diffusion in the modern sense. Diffusion is a process, she describes a state. I guess, in the first case, it's a suspension, in the second case an emulsion. -- Marie Poise (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

I've just taken out the diffusion example to avoid confusion. I've also replaced one of the title pages with the tutor's explanation of "solution" above in a quote box. Awadewit (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Featured Article??

This is probably the most tendentious article I've ever seen up for the main page, and really a triumph of the footnote writer's art. Could Mr. McCarthy have written this any better himself? Why do get the entire epitaph (it's nothing special) but not one line of her actual poetry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.46.177 (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

What do you think is tendentious about it? FAs usually have a lot of footnotes on Misplaced Pages, by the way. It is an artifact of making sure everything is referenced. What poetical quote would you suggest? Awadewit (talk) 07:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

When I saw this article on the main page, I knew it was an Awadewit article. Well done and by the way I had to look up the meaning of tendentious. I disagree with 75.118.45.117. Dincher (talk) 01:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought it might be hers as well. Nicely done, as always. Kafka Liz (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Could it be anyone else? Wonderful work and a pleasure to read. Thank you for another great contribution to Misplaced Pages. (Ice Explorer (talk) 16:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC))

Thanks all! Awadewit (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Is it just me, or isn't it a little odd that this is a featured article two months in a row? Once in Dec. 09, then in Jan. '10?--Dudeman5685 (talk) 16:38, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps you are you thinking of Lessons for Children, which was the TFA on December 16, 2009? Awadewit (talk) 17:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Your right, but still pretty close. I would think that who ever chooses the TFA would have enough choices not to feature a book then its author so close. Just IMHO.--Dudeman5685 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

This one of the few FA's I have read that I would re-read again for pleasure. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

McCarthy biography

I am in the process of reading the McCarthy biography and adding material from it to this article. Awadewit (talk) 04:56, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

NYTimes Reference

This article has been linked from the New York Times as an example of the highest level of WP contributions, in the obituary on the major contributor to the article, Adrianne Wadewitz. I thought it appropriate to add this note here. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 08:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Photo of grave

I'm touching up the images on this & we have this image on Commons, apparently taken in Newington Green's churchyard. But the article says she was buried in a "family vault" with a memorial inscription in the church later. Was she moved subsequently? Or is the photo's name and file info wrong? Johnbod (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

I can confirm that that is her place of rest. It lies in the medieval graveyard surrounding St Mary's Old Church on Stoke Newington Church Street. In fact, the photographed brick structure is right next to the street railings. St Mary's is about a mile from Newington Green Unitarian Church, the nonconformist chapel of which she was a member, and which has never had a burial ground. (I do not know what choices Dissenters had for place of burial at that point in history. It seems incongruous that Barbauld is in a Church of England grave, rather than in Abney Park Cemetery down the road, but the latter didn't open till 15 years after her death.) She has an excessively verbose (marble?) plaque over the door to the vestry of Newington Green Unitarian Church, where her husband had been minister till he went mad, and where she maintained her connections in the decades following. I know of no other memorial to her. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 13:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks - did you see what the article has (presumably Wadewicz): "Barbauld died in 1825, a renowned writer, and was buried in the family vault in St Mary's, Stoke Newington. After Barbauld's death, a marble tablet was erected in the Newington Green Chapel with the following inscription....(all quoted)" Is this the "vault"? Unusual term for an outside grave I'd have thought. Or was she moved? We should perhaps give the modern names for these places of worship as well. Johnbod (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm no expert on burial structures, but I think the item in the photo could be described as a Burial vault (tomb). Maybe. I'm used to graves and crypts and walk-in tombs, but nothing like this blocky brick Thing. So yes, her vault is with the CofE in Stoke Newington, and the memorial (plaque/tablet) is with the Dissenters in Newington Green. I'm ambivalent about changing names. Presumably there is policy on this. Should we write about a place using the name that the subject of the article would have recognised? Or the one that is used now? I bow to greater wisdom. Barbauld wouldn't have called it "St Mary's Old Church" because that's a retronym; there was no New Church to necessitate the differentiation. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 16:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

One would just give both: "old name, now new name, ..." or "New name (then Old Name)" or some such. Usually those C18/19 blocks are just hollow, with a normal grave in the earth below (as becomes apparent when they start to fall apart), & I wouldn't call one a vault myself. Do other family members have inscriptions on it, do you know? They all look rather standard & recent, which might suggest bodies (or "remains") were relocated from inside to out at some point, such as some fearsome Victorian campaign of "restoration". Johnbod (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

I made a detour via the churchyard to see what I could see. Even better, a pair of long-serving council workers were hacking away at the undergrowth, and happy to break to chat. There are a couple of other Things, and yes, they are hollow and prone to crumble, revealing shallow graves. The older worker said that several families could be buried in each Thing. The final chapter of ALB's biography describes visiting the grave, then in poor shape. The mid 1990s perhaps. Since its publication, and possibly because of it (such is the power of public shame), the Thing has been re-bricked, and a new plaque attached. The two on the longer sides are blurred with acid rain and time. The one on the short side facing the camera is new an legible, and gives ALB's name, only. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:09, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Featured article review needed

This very old FA (2007) contains uncited text and original research, and does not meet current WP:WIAFA standards. Unless someone is able to correct this, the article should be submitted to Featured article review. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:37, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I would like to provide some updates during the "edit-athon" being held in connection with the Nineteenth-Century Studies Association Conference next week; meanwhile, I am reading the guidelines and other information about editing/contributing to Misplaced Pages.97.96.16.35 (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, IP97; working an a Featured article is different than other articles, as you must respect a consistent citation style, use only the highest quality sources, and understand Wikpedia’s manual of style, in addition to using professional prose. What is really needed on this article is to determine whether the content that is tagged as needing a citation or as original research can be verified to one of the listed sources. You might find it easier to learn Misplaced Pages’s guidelines and policies on an article that is not already featured, but if you are able to fix the issues noted in the text, that would be grand. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for this advice, SandyGeorgia. Though I don't claim that I can fix everything tagged, I can try to fix some things. I'm actually more concerned with one outdated assertion that is not tagged. Scholarship no longer sees the reviews of 1811 as ending Barbauld's career. An essay by Olivia Murphy in _Anna Letitia Barbauld: New Perspectives_, ed. by William McCarthy and Olivia Murphy (Bucknell UP, 2013) actually criticizes the Misplaced Pages article (among others) for perpetuating that view. What I would most like to do is bring that part of the article up to date, referencing the McCarthy and Murphy volume, along with E. J. Clery's book-length study _Eighteen Hundred and Eleven: Poetry, Protest and Economic Crisis_ (Cambridge UP, 2017), which also takes issue with the idea that Barbauld was shocked into silence by the reviews; Clery claims instead that she provoked them to spur political debate about the topic. 97.96.16.35 (talk) 15:22, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

IP 97, I am happy to hear you might be able to help with the issues tagged, and more. I am aware of similar issues throughout a series of related articles, and it would be grand if you were to stick around after the upcoming conference to help fix similar in those other (related) articles! But by not being a registered user, it is more complicated for me to communicate with you, as I cannot go to your talk page (as you can to mine). If you were to register an account, you would not only have greater anonymity (by posting as an IP, everyone knows your geographic location and your ISP), but you would have your own talk page where others can reach you, and welcome you, too! Also, I want to be sure I can ask you questions about your sources, and don’t want you to go missing :). Please be sure, when using book sources, to provide the page number in the citation. Should you have problems with correct formatting of citations, I can always clean up as long as I have all the relevant info (publisher, date, author, title, page no, ISBN or DOI when available, etc.) Hope to see you soon, improving the sum of all human knowledge and I am most relieved to hear you can help! You might also want to review WP:WIAFA for what Featured articles aspire to (although this one is quite dated). ~~If you don’t mind, I’d like to see the criticism of Misplaced Pages from the source (you can put it here on talk);~~ as I mentioned, I am concerned about related articles. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Found that part: SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:30, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Updates made

Macaron1863 welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for the updates. There are some adjustments that should be made to help this article retain its status as a featured article.

Please have a look at how WP:LEADs are constructed on Misplaced Pages. New material is not introduced in the lead, as the lead should be a summary of the most important parts of the article. Also, for an article this size, the lead would optimally be about three paragraph, as you can see it was in the earlier version. When adding new material to an article, it is optimal to first work it in to the body of the article, and then summarize that briefly back to the lead. Instead, we have now material which is first introduced in the lead, not covered anywhere in the body, and given WP:UNDUE attention in the lead, which now focuses on recent developments. The recent developments should amount to one or two sentences in the lead, with the rest in the body.

Another thing to be aware of is MOS:CURRENT; in a dynamic environment, things like "it is now well established" are without context; whenever terms like now, recently, currently, today are used, they are better replaced by specifics ... depending on what the sources are, something like "In the 21st century" or "as of 2015", or "since the work of x author in y year" would work for this case.

As I am not a literary editor, I would feel more comfortable if you would work the new material into the article in the correct section, and summarize it back to the lead briefly, rather than attempting to do that myself. Unless someone does that, the article assessment will be downgraded because it is now out of compliance with WP:LEAD. As the lead reads now, it is not a summary of the most important parts of the topic, rather it is unduly focused on the controversy, and it needs to be cut down to three summarizing paragraphs.

Also, all of the book sources need page numbers; without those, I will have to tag the article with maintenance tags. If you can add page numbers for every book source, I will then format the citations correctly, so they will be consistent with the citation style in the article. It would also be helpful if you provided ISBNs, DOIs or any other identifiers, which are needed for the citations.

Thanks again for the new content! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I have also indicated some places in the new text where attribution of opinions are needed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi SandyGeorgia. I've made some updates to the article. I believe that all of the book citations have page numbers now; but I wasn't sure how to cite specific chapters of an edited volume, so I made them into general references. Will that work? Let me know your thoughts when you have a chance. Thank you. Macaron1863 (talk) 07:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks so much, Macaron1863; I am traveling, but will have a look as soon as I have a free moment. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

No worries, SandyGeorgia! Whenever you have a chance. Macaron1863 (talk) 15:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Just had a quick look ... do you have page nos or chapters for those tagged in the lead? If you don't know how to edit them into the article, you can put them here on talk and I will get to them from a real computer (not an iPad :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:24, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Categories: