This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RioHondo (talk | contribs) at 05:47, 23 March 2021 (→Kevin Andrew L. Tan: k but...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:47, 23 March 2021 by RioHondo (talk | contribs) (→Kevin Andrew L. Tan: k but...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Kevin Andrew L. Tan
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Kevin Andrew L. Tan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Due to behavioral history of the author, this is highly likely a case of WP:UPE. The article fails to demonstrate notability and instead offers myriad of references to news about the subject's dad relinquishing his position and news articles covering his company's dealings. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 08:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: According to new evidence I am requesting Speedy Delete as per G5. Creations by banned or blocked users. See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Geroge Mason Nearlyevil665 (talk) 10:39, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - per WP:G5, if he is actually notable, someone that isn't a banned sock can write an article on him Spiderone 13:59, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think he is close to notable but I'm not going to weigh-in due to the other factors. I wish this page was properly cited. Eventually, he will be back...Miaminsurance (talk) 15:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Question for User:Miaminsurance - You say that you wish that this page was properly cited. What do you mean? The article has been reference-bombed. Do you mean that you wish that the improper citations weren't there? If the article is deleted, the draft will be in draft space for six months, during which time a neutral editor can tediously check which of the references are any good. If a neutral editor works on it, it will last as long as the work continues plus six months. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. --Devokewater 15:06, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- speedy delete g11, g5, vanity spam. See also this users deleted contribs. VAXIDICAE💉 16:52, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - There was already a draft, Draft:Kevin Andrew L. Tan, written by a previous sock of the spammer before being blocked. This sock then made the necessary ten edits in four days, and then created the exact same article in article space. The less likely explanation is that the second account was ripping off the first account. The more likely explanation is that there is one spammer behind both accounts. The subject may satisfy biographical notability, but the use of this spammer makes it less likely, not more likely, that they will have an article in Misplaced Pages. But they will have an article in a bit bucket. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep but trim promotional content. The subject is notable per multiple third party sources cited in the article.--RioHondo (talk) 05:47, 23 March 2021 (UTC)