This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SamStrongTalks (talk | contribs) at 03:05, 24 June 2021 (OneClickArchived "This article should be labeled WP:GA (Good article) status" to Talk:The Hunger Games (film)/Archive 1). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:05, 24 June 2021 by SamStrongTalks (talk | contribs) (OneClickArchived "This article should be labeled WP:GA (Good article) status" to Talk:The Hunger Games (film)/Archive 1)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Hunger Games (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Hunger Games (film). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Hunger Games (film) at the Reference desk. |
The Hunger Games (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2012. |
Removing dead links
Gloss, when removing dead links, as you did here, keep WP:Dead link (for example, Internet Archive) in mind. That is, if you don't already. The first link for the-numbers.com reference, for example, is archived here. Flyer22 (talk) 05:50, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Oh, and I see that you are iMatthew. Flyer22 (talk) 05:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Flyer22: No worries, I'm aware of WP:Dead link, thanks! - I searched for each one, but I'm sure that I may have missed over more than just the one you found, so any help in finding those missing/dead links would be much appreciated. And yes, that's me! Had my username changed a few days ago. Gloss • talk 06:04, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- Although over reviewing that link again, that is from the week of December 9. The link was for the chart from the week of September 9th. Unless I'm missing something? Gloss • talk 06:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- I simply went to Internet Archive to see if that link was archived, and these are the archive options it shows. Flyer22 (talk) 06:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- With regard to removing stuff like this (the text about female action stars), I mean where WP:Dead link states, "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." Or "Many local libraries have in-house subscriptions to digital databases or inter-library loan agreements, making it easier to retrieve hard-to-find sources." Or "Most citation templates have a
quote=
parameter that can be used to store text quotes of the source material. This can be used to store a limited amount of text from the source within the citation template. This is especially useful for sources that cannot be archived with web archiving services. It can also provide insurance against failure of the chosen web archiving service."
- With regard to removing stuff like this (the text about female action stars), I mean where WP:Dead link states, "Do not delete cited information solely because the URL to the source does not work any longer. WP:Verifiability does not require that all information be supported by a working link, nor does it require the source to be published online." Or "Many local libraries have in-house subscriptions to digital databases or inter-library loan agreements, making it easier to retrieve hard-to-find sources." Or "Most citation templates have a
- In the case of a dead link that can't (readily) be retrieved anywhere online, it is sometimes best to cite the source without the link instead of removing the material altogether. Flyer22 (talk) 06:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- I see what you're saying. I'll go back and fix that up, thanks for the clarity. I cleared out just about all of the dead links, on the bright side. Only a few remain. Although I can't pin-point a solution to those problems.. (they also seem to be very minor problems). Gloss • talk 06:55, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
- In the case of a dead link that can't (readily) be retrieved anywhere online, it is sometimes best to cite the source without the link instead of removing the material altogether. Flyer22 (talk) 06:45, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
Science fiction?
I would question whether the film is science fiction. Dystopian, perhaps, but not science fiction.Royalcourtier (talk) 09:32, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Most sources list the film as sci-fi; Lembrazza (talk) 09:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- It happens in the future and there are some technological, non-magical advances. Sounds like science fiction to me. (The economics is ridiculous, but that's a different issue.) Clarityfiend (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- The definition of science fiction has nothing to do with the future - it is a work of fiction in which science or technology plays a large part. It does not in this film. Although I may be in a minority, I would suggest that a far better description is dystopian fantasy.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- That's a rather odd definition of science fiction. For most people, anything set in the future is considered part of the genre (unless there's magic involved, e.g. The Dying Earth). The article science fiction defines it as "a genre of speculative fiction dealing with imaginative concepts such as futuristic settings, ..." By your definition, Fahrenheit 451 isn't science fiction. Then the Hugo Award people made a big mistake. Fantasy it definitely is not. There's nothing that steps outside the bounds of what technology could develop into. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:12, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- The definition of science fiction has nothing to do with the future - it is a work of fiction in which science or technology plays a large part. It does not in this film. Although I may be in a minority, I would suggest that a far better description is dystopian fantasy.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Ameripedia
As is usual wikipedia, you prattle on about the USA far too much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.142.6 (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2016 (UTC) \
- We do have our inborn hubristic tendencies. Please do forgive and correct us. We are open to it. Especially if you are British or a former colony. Really. A loose necktie (talk) 06:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The Hunger Games (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.dailyprincetonian.com/intersections/2012/02/13/the-hunger-games-soundtrack-actually-looks-pretty-good/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/03/22/3115801/hunger-games-violent-yes-violent.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bostonherald.com/entertainment/movies/general/view/20120324which_dystopian_property_does_the_hunger_games_most_resemble
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—Talk to my owner:Online 21:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Gemre lead
I think dystopian science-fiction adventure film is too mouthful for a lead, I think adventure film does fine. Zalooka4 (talk) 21:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- Peruse through the discussions in Archive 1 of the talk page.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Hunger Games (film)/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 19:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Alright, time to refresh myself on this film series! The last GAN was six years ago, so I'm going to assume that the issues there have been more than addressed and look at this film fresh. As always, a Working tag means that I haven't finished looking at that part of the article yet, but feel free to start making changes as soon as you see them! Kncny11 19:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lede
- The release dates and gross numbers don't need citations in the lede as long as they appear in the body
- Thanks to films like Endgame coming out, ref no longer shows that THG had the third-largest opening weekend gross at the time of its release. Fortunately, this NYT article says it.
- Shorten parentheticals to last name, as Lawrence and Hutcherson were already introduced
- Principal photography began in May 2011 and ended that September
- Move comma from after "March 21, 2012" to after "in some European countries"
- Japanese release is never mentioned in the body
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:08, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Plot
- This section is sitting at 709 words, just over the 400-700 range recommended by MOS:FILMPLOT. Find a few areas to trim.
- Pipe Panem to Fictional world of The Hunger Games.
- Comma after "Careers"
- "eleven" → "11" per MOS:NUMBERS
- "dead from eating what she assumed were edible berries from watching Peeta." → "poisoned to death by the nightlock she collected after watching Peeta." (or something of that sort, just to decrease the double "from")
- The last two paragraphs both begin with "Crane then", which visually looks repetitive.
Cast
- Not necessary to have citations for the cast list unless there's a character description attached
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- With the way that List of The Hunger Games characters has been restructured, only Katniss, Peeta, Gale, Haymitch, Prim, and Snow need to be linked.
- Period after "Mrs." in "Mrs. Everdeen"
Production
- Pipe distribution rights to film distribution
- Sentence structure in the first sentence is confusing atm, as it implies Color Force reportedly bought the rights for $200,000, but the Newsweek citation says Lionsgate spent the money.
- Removed some citations earlier and I couldn't find one from Newsweek. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Pipe Alli Shearmur to Allison Shearmur
- doesn't show anything about the budget being "one of the largest ever"
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- WL Billy Ray (screenwriter) the first time he's mentioned in the body
- Same with Gary Ross
Casting
- strike "coveted" in role, for neutrality
- "Lawrence, a fan of the books, took three days to accept the role, initially intimidated by the size of the production." → "Lawrence, a fan of the books, was originally intimidated by the size of the production, and took three days to accept the role."
- Commas around "other than Hutcherson"
- Write his full name out in its first appearance
- "who was later cast as Cato" needs a citation
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comma after "The following month"
- Need a reference for "Both got the role at the time they were promoting Captain America: The First Avenger"
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- It's also unclear who 'both' refers to, as three names are mentioned in the preceding sentence
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Filming
- List of possible directing candidates needs a citation (EW source doesn't mention them)
- Done Added a source. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- WL underwriting
- Commas around "as part of the underwriting process"
- "dyed her naturally blonde hair"
- Split sentence after "yoga", make separate sentence about her injury.
- Citation needed for that training injury
- The sentence about Hutcherson and Hemsworth dying their hair should be placed next to Lawrence dyeing hers, rather than in the middle of a paragraph about her training process
- Delink Hutcherson and Hemsworth, who were already mentioned above
- "digital due (in part) to the" → "digital, due in part to the"
- WL DuPont State Forest in the body as well as in the thumbnail
- "other scenes also took place and was filmed" → "other scenes were filmed"
- The Shelby/Charlotte/Asheville sentence needs a citation
- Done Added sources. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:48, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- "production team found" → "production team used", to reduce repetition of "found" and reduce implication that they somehow discovered the town
- "looked at
a lot ofphotographs"
- "the 1950s in the search of a very American feel." → "the 1950s, in search of an "American" feel."
- District should be capitalized
- Comma after "every character"
- "differentiate strongly" → "strongly differentiate"
- Missing period before
Music
- Safe & Sound only needs to be linked once, when it appears in the first sentence
- Music video release date needs a citation.
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Citation should only appear once, at the end of the sentence.
- The Daily Princetonian is a student paper and not the best source. Hollywood Reporter has the same information.
- WL the first instance of score to Film score
- WL leitmotif
- Drop the "important and signature" descriptors, which are non-neutral and do not appear in the cited sources
- "Arcade Fire's Panem national anthem" → "The resulting piece"
- "Strong reviews" is followed only by one review
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- WL Star Wars and Big Brother (Nineteen Eighty-Four)
- "a rather obscure" → "an obscure"
- Name the track as "Sediment"
- Question: Could you elaborate? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Move the citation to the end of the paragraph
Critical reception
- "Audiences polled by CinemaScore gave the film an "A" grade."
- Mention in first sentence of second paragraph that it was compared to Harry Potter and Twilight, as many of the reviews in this para talk about that
- Pipe Time to Time (magazine)
- Italics and quotes around The Charlotte Observer
Box office
- Put this above "critical reception"
- "US & Canada" → "United States and Canada"
- The Box Office Mojo stats don't suggest that it made the "largest worldwide opening weekend for a film not released during the summer or the holiday period", because the non-archived version has several films above that, and the archived version doesn't specify release dates.
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- For that matter, many of the records need to specify "at the time of its release" or "as of", as Black Panther (Feb. 2018), Beauty and the Beast (Mar. 2017), and BvS (Mar. 2016) have since overtaken that.
- Mysterious space in the third paragraph with "On its first weekend"
- Drop the "With regard to ticket sales", as the phrase is mentioned later in the sentence
- Comma after "On Fandango alone"
- Comma after "advance ticket seller ever"
- Comma after "according to Fandango"
Themes
- Pipe feminist to feminism
- "Manohla Dargis of The New York Times"
- WL Huffington Post
- comma after "published in the Star Tribune"
- comma before "while the stories contain no actual religion"
Battle Royale and other precedents
- Change first sentence to "Several critics compared The Hunger Games unfavourably to ...", and include specific quotes.
- "The Lottery" is mentioned in the second para but formally introduced in the third
- Comma after "by Shirley Jackson"
- WL The Atlantic
Controversies
- This section is a bit long and could probably be split into subsections on race/ethnicity, weight and body image, and violence
- Question: Got any ideas for the subsection titles and where they should go? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:34, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Italicize Jezebel
- Comma after "for The New York Times"
- Commas around "in certain scenes"
- Comma after "Slate states that"
- "Anderson concludes that complaints"
Accolades
- This section is empty except for a {{main}} link
- Any particularly significant accolades should go here with a citation, even if there's a separate page (see Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, a recent GA). Any award mentioned in the lede is probably a good choice to go here.
Home media
- "and Blu-ray Disc on August 18, 2012"
- "and in the rest of Europe on September 3, 2012" needs a citation
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Amazon isn't the best source, but the DVD extras are mentioned in this EW article
- Refs and (Three weeks after the release...) are both incomplete
- "With 10,336,637 units sold ..."
- Pipe 4K UHD to 4K resolution
- Done Linked to Ultra HD Blu-ray. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Italicize Hunter Games series
Sequels
- Four citations for Lawrence replacing Ross seems excessive
References
- (Forbes) is missing the work in the citation
- Box Office Mojo is sometimes referred to as such, sometimes as Boxofficemojo.com
- Change the work on from New York to Vulture
- Include "url-access=subscription" on (LA Times), (WSJ), (WSJ), (WSJ), (WSJ)
- Include "url-access=limited" on (NYT), (Vulture), (NYT), (NYT), (NYT), (NYT), (NYT), (NYT), (Atlantic), and (NYT)
- Replace "Azdailysun.com" in with Arizona Daily Sun and change it from publisher to work
- WL New York Daily News in and remove the publisher
- In , change Tnr.com from publisher to work and make it The New Republic
- Something in is broken
General comments
- Some scattered vandalism, but no edit warring and overall mostly stable.
- Photos are CC or free use and all relevant to the article.
- Earwig has been giving me grief in terms of its loading time, but it looks like the main offenders are mirror sites, and the iffy % matches are due to direct quotes.
Final comments and verdict
Sorry this took a few days to finish up! I had some personal stuff come up. Anyway, I'm going to put this article On hold. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions, or if anything comes up! Kncny11 17:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: I have added comments for most of your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: In which I am super not on top of things -- for "Sediment", all I meant was that the Laurie Spiegel track is called "Sediment". As for the controversies section, I see three distinct categories as potential subheads: "Race and ethnicity", "Appearance (or casting) of Lawrence", and "Violence". Kncny11 21:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: Both suggestions have now been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: Hell yeah! Passing now. :) Kncny11 21:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: Both suggestions have now been addressed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Some Dude From North Carolina: In which I am super not on top of things -- for "Sediment", all I meant was that the Laurie Spiegel track is called "Sediment". As for the controversies section, I see three distinct categories as potential subheads: "Race and ethnicity", "Appearance (or casting) of Lawrence", and "Violence". Kncny11 21:02, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Kncny11: I have added comments for most of your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
The Minotaur
The story of the Hunger Games is a direct reference to the Ancient Greek myth of the Minotaur. This fact has not been previously mentioned (apparently) in this article, but I have now made a footnote indicating it. Did I overstep my bounds? Is there a reason this was not mentioned before? (or is this just more American hubris, see above). A loose necktie (talk) 06:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Categories:- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- All unassessed articles
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- GA-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles