User talk:Ponyo - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 00:16, 23 November 2021 (→ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:16, 23 November 2021 by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) (→ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Dancing on Ice Series 14

I think we should start creating the Series 14 Dancing on Ice page now as the 1st celeb will be revealed on Monday on This Morning. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

@Annamargarita0: It's fine for you to create it, just not the globally-locked editor who keeps taking a crack at it.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 20:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

List of The Story Makers episodes

https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_The_Story_Makers_episodes Please can you semi-protect that page indefinitely because some vandaliser keeps vandalising that page by adding fake episodes? And I am fed up with it. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 08:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

@Annamargarita0: The IP editor causing the disruption has been blocked by another admin (which provides me with a much needed opportunity to give a shout out to HJ Mitchell). If the disruption picks up again, you can request protection at WP:RFPP.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:42, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

(Redacted) range block

Back in March, you blocked the Special:Contributions/106.78.52.0/24 range (Redacted) . They've been highly active on that range of late, would you mind taking a look to if another block is warranted? They were also using Special:Contributions/49.32.192.0/19 a week ago before moving to the 106 range. Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 17:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Ravensfire I don't see anywhere where I've made an explicit checkuser connection between a sockfarm and that IP range; that would be a violation of the privacy policy and I've oversighted that portion of your message. Please take your concerns to the relevant SPI as I can't make outright CU connections between accounts and ranges.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:51, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ponyo Apologies for that. Will do on the SPI. It would (obviously) be behavior based, so probably later this evening to put enough good diffs together. Not hard to do though, it's been a consistent range for them. Ravensfire (talk) 19:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

It happens. It's not always easy to find the line between preventing outright disruption and protecting the privacy of editors who are determined to undermine our socking policy. -- Jezebel's Ponyo 19:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Tron444444 Block Evasion

You recently partially blocked this user for their vandalism/edit warring on the Midnight Mass article. Why they're so obsessed with changing the references of the Angel to a Vampire, I will never know. BUT they created a new account (same one in the title) and evaded the ban and are back to edit warring. What should be done? Trqalobaid (talk) 07:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

There were a couple of sock accounts; all blocked and tagged now.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 19:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Jean-Paul Belmondo

User:Gary McCabe looks to be another sock. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Got it. -- Jezebel's Ponyo 22:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

That was quick. I assume you were already in process? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Nope. Just quick on the draw I guess!-- Jezebel's Ponyo 23:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

I don't even understand this ConsumersDistributing thing. Why edit war over unrelated articles? Is it just general trolling, or is there some deeper meaning? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

It's either Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/ConsumersDistributingonline, or another LTA joe-jobbing them. Either way, it's trolling.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 23:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

I did a fair amount of ip editing and looking into the sausage making behind Misplaced Pages before making an account, but until I started editing regularly I never had any idea how many LTAs and long term trolls and LTAs Joe jobbing each other were around. It's kinda astounding. Makes all of the doubts and accusations when I made an account more understandable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

User:Reginald J. Robertson ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

They're sure making it easy. Not that I'm complaining.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 20:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

User:‎Maxwell Seymour, maybe page protection? But maybe not because then we won't immediately see them? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:20, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

They'll just move to another set of articles. Better the devil you know? -- Jezebel's Ponyo 20:29, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, makes sense. I do feel like it's more and more likely a joe job, on account of the user page links, but who knows? I guess everyone needs a hobby. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I assume the article is on your watchlist, so is there any point in me reporting the socks here after reverting? I don't want to unnecessarily clutter your talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm catching them through a filter, but can easily miss them if I'm distracted elsewhere. Doubling up on efforts doesn't hurt.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 20:48, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Damn you're quick! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

New sock?

Hello, Ponyo,

Filed a new report on Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/360nosc after gearing up to delete Draft:Evan Nied as a stale draft and finding a new editor had started working on it and appealing its rejection at the AFC Help Desk. Not sure if it's a sockpuppet or meat puppet but there seems to be quite an effort to get this local teenager a Misplaced Pages article. Hope you are well! Liz 03:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice Liz. Looks like it's all taken care of now.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

"2021 World Sambo Championships" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2021 World Sambo Championships. The discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 12#2021 World Sambo Championships until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Deancarmeli (talk) 07:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Well done for the block

Dear Ponyo,

Thank you for the block on User:Redrafting aka 23.28.64.124. I have been firm but friendly with this new user and pointed at various policies. I left a message there not a formal warning just below the bows – to say I felt it was a personal attack on me. (I get this from the user's edit history that I seem to be the only target, no other editrix, so I dunno why I was picked on, but I am not personally upset, just annoyed that it has wasted my time, as I bet you are.)

I do try to encourage new users, and sent plenty of links. I even added the {{welcome}} tag. Before you just blocked, I successfully added a message (not expecting it to be the last), I hope you saw it as you will see it was firm but friendly, pointing the user to various policies and so on. I have some text in my copy buffer, I will copy it to you here, but this was his "positively final appearance" message a few days ago:

I am leaving Misplaced Pages and this account will be abandoned. All further activity that’s related to this account will stop. I am creating a new account. Why? Because I have been receiving bad/inappropriate emails and I forgot my password. I am still logged on but I can’t do this forever. I am also changing emails in my new account. Please stop sending messages after 10Am Tue/October/2021, I won’t respond to them. I can tell you the name of my new account but I really don’t want to. I will be working anonymously with my IP address which is 23.28.64.124. I hope the best of my old account. Bye :) AndroidRedrafting (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Perhaps I should have reported it then. User:Redrafting's page said/says "Retired", now. This user is obviously intelligent: few spelling or grammar errors, and so on. Probably just misguided. I think a three-month ban is a little harsh, but certainly needed a rap across the knuckles.Oh, indefinite. I thought when I first saw it it was three months; I may have been mistaken. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 00:08, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

You did the right thing. I appreciate it. Well done. Sincerely. Wossname said, was it Little Richard no Poor Richard's Almanack (Ben Franklin), "the truth is a harsh mistress, but fools will learn at no other". 85.67.32.244 (talk) 23:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

I didn't pick him up on MOS:STRAIGHT quotes and apostrophes, for example... I was really pretty gentle. 85.67.32.244 (talk) 23:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, Ponyo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Got it, and Done.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 16:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Page creation

Hello, I would like to recreate the Stefano Cilio page since he won a gold record with his single Glance. Could you take the page back please? You removed it and prevented users from recreating it. Thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vecchioscrivano (talk • contribs) 19:23, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

@Vecchioscrivano: Would you consider creating the article via the Articles for Creation process in order to ensure a new article overcomes the concerns of the many deletions and AfD outcome? I see the article has faced the same issues on the Italian Misplaced Pages and is create-protected there as well, which is concerning. If the draft article is accepted via AfC I'll remove the protection. -- Jezebel's Ponyo 19:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

The article was created and deleted, but now things are different and I’m just asking to have it back in order to add the gold record feature. Thanks El Fusto (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

1234ismypassword

Wow, that's got to be the oldest sleeper account that I've ever seen. Amazing that they kept it for 10 years! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Nothing surprises me anymore. #jaded.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 19:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Another new user eagerly getting stuck into redwarn

Hey Ponyo. Got a new user suddenly using RedWarn, creating a sandbox and getting stuck into antivandalism pretty quickly - Zayul. Feels awefully similar to the user you block several days ago - Redrafting. Just wanting to bring it to your attention. Seddon 00:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

It looks like another checkuser looked in to this.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am the user in question. I've just started editing Misplaced Pages and was attracted to the recent changes page. I noticed a lot of vandalism so I fixed some of it. Found RedWarn on WP:CVU and tried to use it but I wasn't autoconfirmed. Anyway, Materialscientist issued a checkuser block to my account and a previous account I had made (ZayulRasco, abandoned for username/privacy purposes, had 1 edit). The reasoning they gave was I had an undisclosed 2nd account and you (I assume you, they just said "another user") suspected me of sockpuppetry. I have made zero abusive edits and plan to keep that number at zero. I can't help but feel that this ban was given in bad faith. My old account is now linked to this one and still banned. Just a bit of an unpleasant welcome to this site. Zayul (talk) 22:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

@Zayul: Are you addressing Seddon or me? To be clear, I haven't run any checks on your account or even reviewed your edits.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 22:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Not sure I guess, just anyone who listened because Materialscientist seems to be unavailable most of the time. Zayul (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) For just starting at Wikpedia, you format a post very well. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

@FlightTime: I'll take that as a compliment I guess. I have some experience on other wikis and a programming background. Zayul (talk) 23:07, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Russell's teapot

The word empirically is misspelled, as "empircally," in the first sentence on this page. I apologize if this isn't how to report this or get this changed, I'm still 100% new here and getting used to the setup. I do appreciate the need for blocking editing on this article. Thank you for your time. Dubya29 (talk) 02:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)

Fixed Special:Diff/1050308329. @Dubya29: If you need an edit on a page you can not edit, see Misplaced Pages:Edit requests. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 02:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

One More Favor

Since you just page-protected Talk:Falcon from that sock, could you also protect Talk:Peregrine falcon, for a bit, too? That vandal also likes to haunt that page, too, trying to angrily revive a four year old thread there.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Apokryltaros I try to only protected article talk pages in cases of excessive abuse. In this case there has only been 2 sock edits today. As a compromise, how about I watch the page and protect it if they return to it today?-- Jezebel's Ponyo 22:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Understood.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Potential block evasion

You blocked this IP yesterday, but I think the same individual is using multiple IP addresses: and have been used for the same intent purpose: using the same tone of language and ranting about perceived bias - most recently with a post on another users page . Iskandar323 (talk) 05:56, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

@Iskandar323: I did notice they had access to a number of ranges, which is why I ended up semi-protecting Talk:Genghis Khan. I think WP:RBI is the best bet here, plus short spurts at semi-protection as needed.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 17:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

about my edits on a wiki page

I'm sorry. You accused me of possibly having a conflict of interest.

While I'm not new at writing, I am new to the wiki format. I didn't mean to erase the entire section on Richard Stanley's[REDACTED] entry. But wiki's interface was fighting with me. And suddenly the whole page was a mess because of one badly entered tag. Sorry, my bad. But that doesn't mean I have a conflict of interest.

I think I've now succeeded in removing the part that wasn't referenced.

Also, if a person's name isn't to be mentioned in a section title, I understand that. But when I started editing that, there already was a name in there. The article I referenced made clear that name was an alias. I merely wanted to make the title factual and accurate.

Hope all is good now.

I hope this is the proper place to respond. Again, I'm new to the interface. Forgive me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CHARLESLESORCIER777 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

@CHARLESLESORCIER777: While leaving a message on my talk page is fine, the correct venue to discuss article content and changes is at the associated article talk page (in this case Talk:Richard Stanley (director)). I also opened a discussion here here which you can join.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Apologies. But it wouldn't let me... that's why I went here. I'll try again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CHARLESLESORCIER777 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

You reverted my AIV report

Hey, please look at Elizabethlake (talk · contribs · count) they're running amuck with BLP vio's. Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:05, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

There was IP vandalism that rendered the reports unreadable. I restored your report, but ended up blocking the account you were reporting, so it popped off the page again. All good now!-- Jezebel's Ponyo 22:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't complaining. I saw that mess at the noticeboard, I was removing it and you got to it first. No problem. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:11, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm a Celeb Series 21

Please can you protect that page as someone keeps adding the celebs when they haven't been revealed by the officials first? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 05:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

@Annamargarita0: Do you mean I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British series 21)? Because there really hasn't been enough activity to justify protection.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 23:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, of course but look at the view history. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 05:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Inaccurate Warning

There is no edit war that I'm engaging in. A legitimate and constructive edit I made was inappropriately removed by another editor and I rightfully objected to it. The situation was ultimately resolved on his talk page and my edit was restored as a result. I value Misplaced Pages and spent a great deal of time here and make edits only to improve readability of articles and to ensure neutrality. To be frank, I find your warning as well as the inappropriate roll backs made by the other editor to be capricious and very offensive. I encourage you and other senior editors to work to improve yourselves in this regard, as your current level of performance is poor and is harming the experience of longtime users such as myself. Thank you. MrJ567 (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

I see that Tide rolls has provided you with a clear explanation as to how your understanding of edit warring is incorrect with regard to both policy and common practice. The message I left on your talk page is a standard warning that you are approaching 3 reverts, and that continued edit warring will likely lead to a block. I made no comment regarding the legitimacy of the content that was being added or removed in said edit war.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 16:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Yeah, Ponyo, apologies if I got in your way. Sometimes my restraint is not up to par. I promise to do better. Tiderolls 16:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

No, it was an excellent summation of the issue and much appreciated. Please feel free to step on my toes anytime!-- Jezebel's Ponyo 17:07, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Jaded-vs-kindness

I must be losing my touch, I thought I was the mean ogre abusive admin type. I've been assured this is the case by multiple people...

kidding aside, I actually see it basically the same way you do, but if there is a path to an unblock, it isn't the approach they are using now. I also would guess that being on arbcom has an affect on my perspective, this person has been dishonest and obsessive about something truly unimportant, but they are nowhere near some of the levels of outright crazy that arbcom deals with on a daily basis. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

So, you're saying I should run for ArbCom to get my kindness-mojo back? tongue, meet cheek-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Just a note to thank you for the warning you gave SkylerLovefist. If he had reverted my removal again I would have reported him to ANI, but you saved me the trouble. His responses to you indicates (in my humble opinion) the potential of further trouble should I edit something that he doesn't like. He is worth keeping an eye on. Thanks again. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Just as an update - SkylerLovefist may have violated WP:CIVIL again in the edit summary here. The sarcasm here is very heavy. I don't expect action, but now that I have tagged the source as possibly unreliable and started a thread here I will not be surprised if he removes the tag attaching more incivility and may also go to the talk page I linked and attack me as he has before. I would appreciate some help purely on the civility issue (you have rightly said you aren't interested in the content issue and I am not seeking your involvement in that). Addicted4517 (talk) 09:06, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Another thank you for the 72 hour block. However his response to the block on his talk page suggests that nothing will change once he returns. I'm not convinced the block is long enough as a result but I'll leave that up to you. An administrator (maybe you, maybe someone else) should IMHO give him a breakdown of exactly why his conduct was wrong, and if he persists beyond that it will show that he is not here to create an encyclopedia. Just a thought bubble. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Outside of copyright violations, vandalism-only accounts and WP:NONAZI/blatant WP:NOTHERE incidences, a short-term first-time block is pretty standard, with blocks escalating if the disruptive behaviour continues. They appear to have an intractable problem with civility, but they need to be given the opportunity to improve once the block expires.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Totally understand. Hopefully no further action is needed, but I suspect there might be. We'll see I guess. Addicted4517 (talk) 07:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Question about privacy/BLP

Hi Ponyo! Regarding this edit you made a couple days ago, I'm wondering what the Misplaced Pages policy is on people who claim to be the person the article covers? In that case, the user claims to be Tim Atkins (in his edit summaries) and wanted his DOB and place of birth removed. To be honest, I thought it was just a troll/vandal so that's why I reverted the edits (probably a bad faith assumption on my part - oops!) If someone claims to be the subject of an article, do you give them the benefit of the doubt and remove any info they don't want? I know phone numbers, emails, home addresses, and the like are a huge no-no on Misplaced Pages, but I didn't think DOB and place of birth was too big of an issue.

Just trying to learn so I know how to tackle the issue next time it arises. Thanks! :) --My Pants Metal (talk) 15:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi @My Pants Metal: The relevant policy is the WP:BLPPRIVACY. If personal information is contested and removed in a BLP, editors should really take a hard look at the stated reasons for the removal and the associated sourcing prior to restoring the disputed content. In this case, the birth date removed was unsourced, so it shouldn't have been restored regardless of whether the editor removing the content was the subject of the article as they claim. Even if the birth date met the "widely-published by reliable sources" criteria, WP:DOB suggests only using the birth year in such cases where privacy concerns have been raised. I don't see any reason to doubt the editor's identity, it's not uncommon for BLP subjects (or their friends/family members at the behest of the subject) to create accounts to remove such information for privacy reasons. It's often helpful to provide the subject with a link to Misplaced Pages:FAQ/Article subjects. Note that this only covers the removal of basic personal info; attempts at scrubbing well-sourced negative material from a BLP by article subjects requires a whole other level of scrutiny and response. -- Jezebel's Ponyo 16:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

A new possible sock of Giolocam which was a confirmed sockpuppet of Benniejets.

Hello Ponyo, I think I have found a new possible sock of Giolocam (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) that actually was a confirmed sock of Benniejets (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Benniejets) as the editing/writing style is very similar to Giolocam. I reported Giolocam and you banned him as it was a confirmed sockpuppet. Giolocam started edit warring in exactly the same article as this new user is doing right now. Also same writing style (dubious English skills) and same edit pattern, which is boosting up the data Italy has in that page.

The affected page is:

List of European countries by average wage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The suspected user is:

Msimoncinifideuram.it (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

I have also noticed that this user was constantly using and adding the word "great power" to the Italy page, like many Benniejets socks did many times.

Italy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I didn't even try to write anything in this user's talk page as in the past that was completely useless, since the pattern is exactly the same, doing 8 reverts in a row with sourced data to put fake, boosted up data for Italy as well as changing the map and chart parameters to make Italy fit within richer European countries in the same page, something that was constantly done by Giolocam and Benniejets and it's in fact written in the Benniejets long-term abuse case as the socks are always editing with a strong Italian POV. Could you please check this user as well? I'ts very suspicious. Thank you. --Pfarla (talk) 18:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

I've blocked the account as a

Likely sock.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Help

Please block the vandal who vandalizes my discussion page, leaving death wishes in Ukrainian. I also ask you to completely block the IP address of Kyivstar where this vandal is vandalizing. And also clean up the stories on my discussion page. Thanks. --Jphwra (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

@Jphwra: The account is blocked, but I can't block the underlying IP addresses, the range is too wide. If they do return, I can protect your talk page from editing by new new accounts. Ymblanter has taken care of the revision deletions. I'm sorry you've been the target of this type of harassment.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

sock

Hi there, you blocked Felix4518 as a sock of Peluches extronidos earlier last month. I think they've returned as Zodof, with similar recreations of Missa Sinfonia/Draft:Missa Sinfonia. Would appreciate if you could take a look. Thanks! Aranya (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nabbed by Bbb23 whilst I toiled away in the factory.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

The inevitable return

Hello P. I hope that you are well and have had as pleasant an autumn as we've had. Aarzoo19921999 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) looks to be the latest incarnation of Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/109.151.65.218. Regards. MarnetteD|Talk 11:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Harry nabbed them.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Just clearing out AIV while I had a bit of time on my hands. Glad I could help. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:38, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Always happy when our paths cross (as well as MarnetteD!).-- Jezebel's Ponyo 18:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks to you both. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 20:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Strictly Come Dancing Series 19

Some unregistered user keeps adding Sharon Needles & Artem Chigvintsev on that Strictly page, can you re-protect that page & whoever keeps adding them needs to be blocked immediately please? --Annamargarita0 (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Done. Blocked a couple of socks too.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Appreciate your help over at Robert J. Parins. I was trying to stay uninvolved as the original issue was a content dispute, but the socking and user name was a bit much haha. Thanks for the quick clean up! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

No problem. Happy to step in and take the heat.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 20:37, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

When you have a moment

Hello P. If you are still editing this afternoon would you please take a look at 2601:81:C401:11F0:EC8E:6336:BB40:1D84 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). They are adding info about who owns the studio today to articles in which the item is irrelevant. I've let them know why this is a problem but it has made no difference. If you've logged off no worries. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 20:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

They just came off a 3-month block not too long ago for the same disruption. I've now reblocked the range.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Good deal P. Thanks for your time :-) MarnetteD|Talk 21:44, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

"Time, time, time, see what's become of me"-- Jezebel's Ponyo 21:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

That is a great link. Sent me time traveling down memory lane :-) MarnetteD|Talk 22:31, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)