Misplaced Pages

Talk:Silicon Valley Bank

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 10 March 2023 (Use of the past tense). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:46, 10 March 2023 by Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs) (Use of the past tense)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconCompanies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events.
Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.

Good evening. I Tommy Josiah from Sierra Leone received a transfer from this bank on June 10 this year in my email. I don't know if it true. Please help me.

I really need an answer. Please, Please help. 102.143.10.69 (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

LOLs 159.53.174.249 (talk) 17:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Please contact me on josiahtommy123@gmail.com

Thanks very much for your understanding. 102.143.10.69 (talk) 00:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Bank run or shutdown

The leade is saying a bankrun but the body says FDIC shut it down. Which is it? 131.193.101.85 (talk) 18:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Use of the past tense

The article refers to the bank in the past tense. This seems incorrect. It reportedly suffered a run and has been shut down by the FDIC, but it still exists. I'm not expert, but I understand that it will likely be taken over by new management soon and resume some operations. It may eventually be run down and/or liquidated, but even if that does eventually happen, it hasn't happened yet. The bank exists at this point. "Is" is appropriate. "Was" isn't. The Peanut Gallery (talk) 18:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

I agree. For example, CNBC is reporting that: "The FDIC said in the announcement that insured depositors will have access to their deposits no later than Monday morning. SVB’s branch offices will also reopen at that time, under the control of the regulator."
I concede that it is a bit murky at the moment with many headlines saying that the regulators "closed" it but also say "seized control". So I'm not making the change myself, just noting that it is odd to say "was" just now.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Silicon Valley Bank Add topic