Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
At some point can you boldly edit the template's message? My on-the-spot "This article could be improved by adding text relevant to the section's heading" should probably not be in the passive voice and anyway more-or-less duplicates the second sentence. It need to convey that a previous editor thought someone should provide text described by the topic, and you can help! I also think DePiep was suggesting that the doc page could suggest other context-specific replacement text. David Brooks (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC) ETA: just looked at your user page. I grew up in Penge. David Brooks (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Sure, once the discussion is closed I'll have a go (maybe reword "you can help by adding to it" to "you can help by adding text relevant to the section's heading"?) I was definitely planning on adding Certes' explanation to the template documentation, and going through the cleanup backlog to remove some of the oldest instances. Nice, I grew up just down the road from you in Crystal Palace :) – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱22:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry to nag, but several more recent comments suggest it would be really helpful to make its text into an invitation. It's almost venturing into "propose merge with {{Expand section}}" territory, but I think a reword as suggested would buy some time. David Brooks (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
I left a comment there, I feel uneasy about editing the template while the discussion is ongoing, hopefully someone will close it today – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱09:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
If you'd like to try and rewrite the article based on independent sources, I can restore you a copy from before the redirect to draftspace. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱08:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)