Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPECIFICO (talk | contribs) at 21:58, 16 December 2023 (→1RR). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Andre🚐's Talk ☎️ Page Archive 📇 Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67
☕ Threads archived by ClueBot III after 72h ☕

Contentious topics awareness

This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people the Balkans or Eastern Europe gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them the Arab–Israeli conflict abortion climate change articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles pseudoscience and fringe science the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues COVID-19, broadly construed complementary and alternative medicine He should not be given alerts for those areas.

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify them!

This is my talk page.You can start a new thread by clicking here.

December 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Iennes (talk) 07:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

I haven't edit warred, no. I made one revert. Andre🚐 07:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

1RR

You have violated the 1RR at 2023 Israel–Hamas war, in addition to making nakedly partisan and tendentious edits. Please self-revert your latest change or you will be reported. nableezy - 09:28, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Actually, you have already declined to self-revert above, so Ill be reporting it now. nableezy - 09:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Where did I violate 1RR? I made one revert. Andre🚐 09:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:AE#Andrevan. nableezy - 09:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Utter BS and bad faith. No attempt at reconciliation or understanding of an innocent error that was immediately fixed. I doubt Nableezy would appreciate being treated in the same manner the next time they make an error. They have now created a karma debt they will likely be forced to pay at some point in the future when they reveal they are not perfect. I have commented at AE. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

It is extremely disappionting that Admins are not actively watching and engaging on these topics where some editors appear to be NOTHERE pursuing a deeply held personal POV. I am struck by how well the editing environment and interpersonal culture has developed in American Politics where only a few (impatient) newbies tend to get so upset with disussions of NPOV, BLP, etc. Some of the current mideast editors include personal attacks and denial of policy in nearly every post on the talk pages and don't even bother to address calmly stated concerns of editors whose editorial opinions differ from theirs. SPECIFICO talk 21:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

If you haven't seen it, check out the Noam Chomsky article and talk. A 100 year old man, one of the most famous and notable public thinkers for decades, and suddenly an editor claims that some past thougths of Chomsky about Israel were overlooked but meet WEIGHT after all these years to the contrary. SPECIFICO talk 21:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

• Wikipedians open to trout slapping