Misplaced Pages

Talk:Enactivism

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 00:53, 14 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Cognitive science}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 00:53, 14 February 2024 by Cewbot (talk | contribs) (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Philosophy}}, {{WikiProject Cognitive science}}, {{WikiProject Psychology}}.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Enactivism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Enaction (philosophy) was copied or moved into Enactivism with this edit on April 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Mind Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophy of mind
WikiProject iconCognitive science (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science
WikiProject iconPsychology
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Enactivism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Misleading sentence in the header.

Enactivism as introduced in 'The Embodied Mind' by Varela Thompson and Rosch suggested that the environment or world is enacted by us, not independently pre-given from which we selectively create our environment. I believe the second sentence in the lead: " It claims that our environment is one which we selectively create through our capacities to interact with the world" does suggest a pre-given world from which we enact our environment, and thus gives a wrong account from the start. I propose we replace it with 'It claims that the environment of an organism is brought about, or enacted, by the active exercise of that organism's sensorimotor processes' with an appropriate reference from The Embodied Mind. I welcome any comments on this.

TonyClarke (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

No response to my above proposal for editing, so I did it.

TonyClarke (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Enactivism Add topic