Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tonymetz

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tonymetz (talk | contribs) at 00:48, 27 February 2024 (What part of....: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:48, 27 February 2024 by Tonymetz (talk | contribs) (What part of....: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is Tonymetz's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earny (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was: This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. The comment the reviewer left was: Blatant advert by a paid contributor. Nothing like the Notability required for companies. Tagging for deletion. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. KJP1 (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

What part of....

"I won't be partaking" did you not understand? Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

you never addressed the low quality of the two citations you are using for the claim. I pointed out the issues with both. I'm aiming to keep the bar high for citations. If the claim is endorsed by facts, you should have no problem finding high quality sources. Tonymetz (talk) 00:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
User talk:Tonymetz Add topic