Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration Committee - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Habesha212 (talk | contribs) at 17:02, 25 March 2024 (Kingdom of Aksum and Ethiopian Greek page: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:02, 25 March 2024 by Habesha212 (talk | contribs) (Kingdom of Aksum and Ethiopian Greek page: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:
  • requesting arbitration: WP:A/R
  • discussing finalised decisions of the committee: WT:ACN
  • discussing pending decisions: find the proceedings page at Template:Casenav
  • discussing the process of arbitration: WT:A/R
Shortcuts
Media mentionThis Arbitration Committee has been mentioned by a media organization:
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Archiving icon
WT:AC Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Contentious topics designation for Talk:Turkey

I'm going to add a contentious topic designation for Talk:Turkey, similar to Talk:Climate change. My understanding is that Turkey may involve several contentious topics: 1) the Balkans or Eastern Europe, 2) the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, and 3) Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Is that correct? Should I add one or all 3 to the talk page? Thanks! Bogazicili (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

You could add all three. You should use the "section=yes" parameter of the template to indicate that only parts of the article are covered. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
@Firefangledfeathers: thanks! I added 1 long and 2 short notices. There doesn't seem to be an option to include multiple topics within one template. Bogazicili (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
There isn't. It's on my wishlist for sure. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 18:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Protection of AfD discussions due to contentious topic restriction

I have lately seen a number of AfDs being ECPed with summaries relating to arbitration enforcement, especially WP:RUSUKR and WP:ARBPIA4. I am wondering why such discussions get protected, unlike most talk pages of contentious topics? Toadette 17:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@ToadetteEdit. WP:ARBECR gives the answer, I think. When an EC restriction is in place in a topic area, it applies to the whole topic area with the exception that editors who are not extended confirmed may use the "Talk" namespace to make edit requests. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Petition to amend ARBPOL to add options for U4C

Please see WP:Village pump (policy)#Petition to amend ARBPOL to add options for U4C. Thank you. signed, SpringProof 04:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Kingdom of Aksum and Ethiopian Greek page

Both contain inaccurate information and poor sources. I am banned from ediiing which is clearly an attempt to silence me. Spinning history or distorting it should not be allowed. Habesha212 (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:
Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Add topic