Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
It is requested that a map or maps, showing Territory occupied by DLNR under the Minsk agreements before the 2022 invasion, be included in this article to improve its quality.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with limited recognition on Misplaced Pages by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
Novorossia ruble was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 August 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Donetsk People's Republic. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The territorial control map should be deleted as this article is about an entity that exists under Russian law, not about the military situation on the territory of the DPR. The territorial control vs. claimed territory distinction can be made by using a lighter shade of red on the map of the Russian federal subjects just below the current territorial control map.
No, there is a big difference. This is territory militarily by one side during an active war. North8000 (talk) 13:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
I think the issue is that Ukraine, like most countries, is built up of separate internal parts - Oblasts I believe - and I think all sides like to assume that the borders of those areas have to be respected. Thus while Russia claims territory it doesn't control, its claim is based on control over a specific political region. Imagine Canada decided that Minnesota belongs to Canada and they took over the twin cities and the state institutions. If the rest of the United States fought to retake the state and forces from Iowa, Wisconsin, and the Dakotas all occupied a large chunk of Minnesota, it would still be reasonable for Canada to claim those occupied areas since it claimed Minnesota as a whole and the entity of Minnesota has a border regardless of which country occupies a given county. China doesn't control Taiwan's entire political and legal system thus them claiming Taiwan belongs to them isn't the same. 2604:2D80:6305:600:51A1:2330:7897:134E (talk) 01:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 November 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "In February 2017 a bomb planted in an office killed Mikhail Tolstykh ("Givi")." to "In February 2017 a remotely triggered rocket launcher killed Mikhail Tolstykh ("Givi")." Under the Law and order section.
Donetsk is still considered Ukraine by the world! Since when do parts of one country officially become part of another just because the second country said so? AllMyKidsHavePaws (talk) 12:15, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Its more complicated than that. The people in that part of Ukraine really didn't like the government of Ukraine after the revolution. So its wrong to say that they're part of Russia but its also kind of wrong to suggest they're part of Ukraine as well considering that they have 0 political power in Ukraine and the people in those regions really don't like the people in the western part of Ukraine. You have to remember that the world isn't a simple place and the internal issues in Ukraine aren't simple either. People in both parts of the country couldn't get along and they both really didn't like each other. Foreign countries like Russia and the rest of Europe getting involved in internal political problems in Ukraine only made the problem much more complicated. Neither side of Ukraine is totally in the right or in the wrong. I don't think the people in the eastern part of the country want to be part of Russia but they also don't want to be subservient to the people in the western part of Ukraine who kind of see them as parasites from Russia. Just because civil society groups claiming to love democracy may seem noble doesn't mean they don't have more selfish intentions - albeit ones masked by subjective interpretations of ideas like social justice. Obviously the people in the western part of Ukraine failed to govern properly and when they had the chance to make major reforms to improve the internal division in their country, they instead decided to put on the ring of Sauron and gain full political power over their internal rivals. Obviously, given the statistics, the entire country of Ukraine failed the people in the eastern half and thus it would be foolish to believe that people in that part of the country would feel secure knowing their internal rivals have free reign to do whatever they want.
Ukraine is living proof that just because you can do something and justify it in the name of democracy and civil society, doesn't mean you'll be free from consequences nor does it mean that your intentions are noble. There are no 'good' sides in real world conflicts. The only difference is how well each side markets itself. 2604:2D80:6305:600:51A1:2330:7897:134E (talk) 01:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
The term 'pro-Russian'
I think this term is being overused and kind of mischaracterizes the sentiments of a lot of the people in eastern Ukraine. It seems more that the 'pro-Russian' Ukrainians are really just opposed to the western 2/3 of the country due to internal division. I'm pretty sure a lot of the fires starting in Russia are probably done by these so-called 'pro-Russian' Ukrainians who now have Russian citizenship and have a grievance against Russia as well as the Ukrainians west of the Dnieper.
As Americans, we're better than Russians and we shouldn't stoop to their levels by lying about the sentiments of others. Claiming that eastern Ukrainians have some sort of unrealistic love for a foreign country is the kind of absurd belief that Russia would push. 2604:2D80:6305:600:51A1:2330:7897:134E (talk) 01:05, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Referencing and citation: criterion met
Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
![[REDACTED]](https://u3vuiephb.global.ssl.fastly.net/File:Misplaced Pages-logo-v2.svg){kind=link}
