Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Throughthemind (talk | contribs) at 13:38, 11 January 2025 (←Created page with '{{Use dmy dates|date=January 2025}} {{Use British English|date=January 2025}} {{Infobox book | name = An Essay on Humanity to Animals | image = An Essay on Humanity to Animals title page.jpg | caption = | author = Thomas Young | country = United Kingdom | language = English | subject = Animal ethics, Christian theology | publisher...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An Essay on Humanity to Animals

Author	Thomas Young
Language	English
Subject	Animal ethics, Christian theology
Publisher	T. Cadell, Jun. and W. Davies; W. H. Lunn; J. Deighton
Publication date	9 March 1798
Publication place	United Kingdom
Media type	Print (hardcover)
Pages	202
OCLC	1422462229

An Essay on Humanity to Animals is a 1798 book by the English theologian Thomas Young. It advocates for the compassionate treatment, welfare, and natural rights of animals, critiques the various forms of cruelty they endure in human activities, and emphasises the moral obligation to prevent their suffering. Grounded in moral, scriptural, and philosophical arguments, the book promotes humane practices and emphasises the ethical responsibilities humans have toward animals, particularly in recognising their sentience, capacity for suffering, and entitlement to humane treatment. Young addresses a wide range of issues, including the cruelty evident in children’s behaviour, inhumane sports, the unnecessary suffering caused by hunting and fishing for leisure, and the ethical concerns surrounding animal abuse in agriculture and food preparation.

Summary

The book is divided into several chapters, each addressing a specific aspect of human-animal relationships. The opening chapter establishes the connection between cruelty to animals and broader societal brutality. Young argues that acts of violence against animals desensitise individuals, fostering a general disposition of cruelty that can extend to human interactions. He underscores this by highlighting animals' sentience—their ability to perceive pleasure and pain—and argues that this capacity places a moral obligation on humans to treat them with compassion. He describes animal rights as stemming from the natural world and the Creator's will, asserting that animals' capacity for suffering establishes their moral entitlement to humane treatment. Young links humanity's treatment of animals with moral and spiritual well-being, drawing on Christian teachings and natural evidence to emphasise the duty of compassion and the Creator's intention for the happiness of all sentient beings.

Subsequent chapters focus on particular forms of cruelty. Young highlights the dangers of allowing children to torment animals, suggesting that such behaviour, if unchecked, can lead to callousness in adulthood. He then turns to the cruelty inherent in popular entertainment, such as bull-baiting, cockfighting, and hunting for sport, which he condemns for promoting insensitivity and vice. Similarly, he criticises practices like fishing and shooting for pleasure, arguing that they inflict unnecessary suffering and lack moral justification.

Young dedicates a chapter to the mistreatment of horses, which he describes as noble and indispensable animals often subjected to overwork, mutilation, and abuse. He calls for better treatment of horses, emphasising their loyalty and the significant role they play in human industry and transportation. He also addresses food-related cruelty, such as skinning animals alive or crimping fish, practices he deems both inhumane and unnecessary. Additionally, Young critiques the common practice of killing bees to harvest honey, suggesting alternative methods that allow humans to benefit from bees' labor without destroying their colonies.

The essay concludes with a discussion of miscellaneous cruelties, including the mistreatment of dogs, which Young highlights as one of the most loyal and intelligent of animals. Through anecdotes and observations, he illustrates the profound attachment animals can have to humans and the moral failings of those who repay such loyalty with neglect or abuse.

Reception

A reviewer for the The Monthly Review commended An Essay on Humanity to Animals for its eloquence and moral advocacy, highlighting poignant stories like a polar bear's sacrifices to save her cubs. It praised the work's ability to inspire compassion and promote humane treatment of animals, considering it a significant contribution to the cause of animal welfare. The Monthly Mirror praised the book for its compelling arguments against animal cruelty, recommending it to those involved in activities like horse racing and cockfighting. The review highlighted its engaging style, zoological examples, and emphasis on animals' capacity for suffering. The British Critic praised the work's benevolence and moral arguments, though noted occasional over-refinement. It recommended the work for those overseeing children's education due to its potential positive influence. The review supported its criticism of practices like bird-netting, hunting, and cockfighting, and praised its introductory Ode to Humanity as elegant and fitting.

Legacy

In his 1892 work Animals' Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress, Henry S. Salt listed the book in the bibliography on animal rights. According to animal rights historian Rod Preece, John Styles's essay, The Animal Creation: Its Claims on Our Humanity Stated and Enforced, appears to have borrowed extensively from Young's earlier writings, potentially amounting to plagiarism.

Publication history

The book was published on 9 March 1798 by T. Cadell, Jun. and W. Davies in the Strand, with additional distribution by W. H. Lunn in Oxford Street and J. Deighton in Cambridge. An abridged version was published in 1804 by Knott and Lloyd in Birmingham.

In 2001, Rod Preece released an edited volume through Edwin Mellen Press, which included an introduction, annotations, and a foreword contributed by David Fraser.

References

1. "Miscellaneous". The Monthly Review. 25: 467–469. 1798 – via HathiTrust.
2. "Review of Literature". The Monthly Mirror. 5: 293. 1798 – via HathiTrust.
3. "British Catalogue: Miscellanies". The British Critic. 11: 697. 1798 – via HathiTrust.
4. Salt, Henry S. (1894). Animals' Rights: Considered in Relation to Social Progress. New York: Macmillan & Co – via The Animal Rights Library.
5. Preece, Rod (2017). "John Styles". Awe for the Tiger, Love for the Lamb: A Chronicle of Sensibility to Animals. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-94363-5.
6. "An Essay on Humanity to Animals". The Times. 9 March 1798. p. 2. Retrieved 11 January 2025.
7. Young, Thomas (1804). An Essay on Humanity to Animals (Abridged ed.). Birmingham: Knott and Lloyd.
8. "Academic Book: An Essay on Humanity to Animals (1798)". Edwin Mellen Press. Retrieved 10 January 2025.

External links

• An Essay on Humanity to Animals at the Internet Archive
• An Essay on Humanity to Animals at HathiTrust
• An Essay on Humanity to Animals at Google Books
• An Essay on Humanity to Animals (abridged) at Google Books

• 1798 non-fiction books
• Animal ethics books
• Christian theology books
• English-language non-fiction books
• English non-fiction books