This is the current revision of this page, as edited by OwenX (talk | contribs) at 11:18, 17 January 2025 (→== Deletion review for EV GROUP: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 11:18, 17 January 2025 by OwenX (talk | contribs) (→== Deletion review for EV GROUP: Reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics, and sign your entry by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Thank you.
Click here to start a new topic.
 Archives | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Droners recreation
Back in June 2024, you closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Droners (2nd nomination) as redirect. It was recreated today, I reverted back to the redirect per the AfD, but was then reverted less an hour later. The article is substantially the same as before, but with less references than during the AfD, four total with one being the same as before. I was going to put a speedy repost tag, but since the article technically was not deleted, I was not sure that would fit. So instead I come to you for possible solutions. Aspects (talk) 01:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi Aspects!
- Seeing as the AfD was over half a year ago, enforcing its outcome now would be seen as heavy-handed, especially since participation was minimal. Instead, I suggest you start a discussion on the article's Talk page, pinging anyone who participated in either of the two AfDs. If that fails to reestablish consensus to redirect the page, you can take it to another AfD. Owen× ☎ 14:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Aria (Indian singer) - discussion of restoration
Hello Hi good day, the page you redirected to X:IN, A discussion about restoration began. This page Deletion closed review AfD informs you of this discussion as a closed admin, thank you!! ~~ Spworld2 talk 14:36, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
== Deletion review for EV GROUP
An editor has asked for a deletion review of EV GROUP. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jn.mdel (talk) 10:30, 16 January 2025 (UTC) ==
- @OwenX I hope you would be looking into this request.
- I am not sure about the protocols involved at[REDACTED] - but I left this message on your talkpage only because the "instructions" on deletion review suggest to do so on page of "who closed the deletion discussion".
- Anyways I only hope you would peruse the submission from an objective perspective. Jn.mdel (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. You have fulfilled your duty to inform me. The case is now in the hands of WP:DRV. There's nothing for me to decide. Owen× ☎ 11:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Please see and decide, thanks