Misplaced Pages

:Requested moves/Current discussions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requested moves

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RMCD bot (talk | contribs) at 19:41, 22 January 2025 (Updating requested pagemoves list). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:41, 22 January 2025 by RMCD bot (talk | contribs) (Updating requested pagemoves list)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcuts
This page lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.
Do not attempt to edit this list manually; a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{subst:Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed.
To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 115 discussions have been relisted.

January 22, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Gunnison grouse → Gunnison sage-grouse – Far and away the most common name for this species. A search on Google Scholar for "Gunnison Sage Grouse" returns 1430 results. A search for "Gunnison Grouse" returns just 38, most only barely relevant. For some reason, IOC is using the name "Gunnison Grouse" for this species, and a few other sources that follow their names such as IUCN and Xeno-canto are using it, but I see no evidence that anyone within the United States where the species is actually found is following along. We already use the non-IOC name for greater sage-grouse. This is such a obvious case I considered not even doing a RM but I figure there's no harm in putting this up here for a week or two. Somatochlora (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Kerolin → Kerolin Nicoli – I am suggesting that the page be renamed to Kerolin Nicoli, considering that this is the name the athlete is using for her social media, as well as the club that just signed her (Manchester City W.F.C.) used in the announcement. I have only heard of her being referred to as "Kerolin Nicoli" prior to this instance of editing her Misplaced Pages page and I believe that such a clarification would only benefit the general reader. I look forward to hearing everyone's opinion on this. Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 14:34, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – 2024 Al-Mustariha massacre → 2024 Turkish airstrikes in Syria – Consistency. This article should be named like 2024 Homs airstrikes or April 2017 Turkish airstrikes in Syria and Iraq. Because these air strikes are organised for enemy sides of the perpetrator's and some civillians killed in those air strikes. This title means that Turkey only carries out air strike to massacre innocent civilians. However, this airstrike is only one of 191 airstrikes against the SDF-YPG, therefore we cannot seperate this air strike from other 190 air strikes. All of them are carried out within 2024. The content also mentions the death toll from other airstrikes. Also these airstrikes belongs to Hasakah province, Raqqa province and rural Aleppo. This title mentions 11 civilians in Raqqa province but how about other 6 civillian deaths in Hasakah province? If you look at death toll, military personnels also killed besides civillians and this means that Turkish Air Force didn't target civillians especially. Also it's ridiculous to target little amount of civillians in a village. If Turkish Air Force want to kill civillians, bombing big city centers is more efficient way like Israel did in Gaza Strip. Therefore that title is biased and we cannot named this event as a massacre just for killed civillians because more military personnels killed in these air strikes. Seondly,[REDACTED] there's a village named Mustariha and it's located at Idlib. However news says it's a village in the suburbs of Ain Issa. I cannot find location of the village. It's very interesting. All in all, this article should be moved to "2024 Turkish airstrikes in Syria" However we can use northern Syria but I'm not sure about geographic naming. Note: If the title I propose is appropriate, the content should be revised accordingly, because it gives the impression that the attack was made specifically for this village and targeted especially civillians in this village.--Sabri76' 17:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

January 21, 2025

  • (Discuss) – On the Run! (Jay Chou album) → On the Run! – Per WP:PTOPIC, WP:PRECISE and WP:RMUM. Article was moved from the long time title of On the Run! to the current title in October 2024 without discussion, with the original title redirected to the DAB page. There is no other album, song, tour, film, or book on the DAB page which contains the exclamation mark except this album, making it the clear WP:PTOPIC for said name (for example the band Root!). If the original title was to remain to redirect to the DAB, at least change this title to On the Run (Jay Chou Album) for consistancy with the others. Zinderboff (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Prophets of Christianity → Prophets in Christianity – If we search on bible non of the books mentions any prophet as Christians. I think it can be said from a pov of Christians but from a secular pov it should be "Prophets in Christianity" the current title doesn't align with a secular perspective cause most of prophets are from the old testament the Hebrew bible and most of those prophets live before Christianity came it's like Islam claims all of the prophets were Muslim but it's there own pov and Misplaced Pages uses the term Prophets and messengers in Islam not "of" and same with Prophets in Judaism although lots of the prophets in those Abrahamic religion were ethnicity Jew but none preached or talk about religions like Judaism, Christianity or Islam. Therealbey (talk) 20:15, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – 2022–2023 Moldovan energy crisis → 2022 Moldovan energy crisis – The current title is the result of an undiscussed move by PoppysButterflies. I've wondered for a while if this was appropriate. It appears in February the energy crisis was already referred to in past language , and even in late January . Energy prices decreased on 1 January 2023 , and they had already been decreasing on November 2022 . The gist of the crisis was the reduction of Russian gas supplies to Moldova in October 2022 and its lack of alternatives. The deal with Transnistria to supply all Russian gas there in exchange of cheap electricity was reached in December 2022 , so by then government-held Moldova allegedly no longer used Russian gas . Gas supplies through Romania to Moldova too started on December , so alternative supplies had been found by then, but I am not aware if this meant Romania was already supplying all of its gas to Moldova as happens today. There were conflicting reports throughtout 2023 as to when exactly had Moldova stopped depending on Russian gas. Though Moldova did receive EU funds to combat the energy crisis in early 2023, maybe this was just to replenish a depleted government budget, as the government handed over compensations for the increase in energy prices (the system was created in October 2022 precisely). Looking through academic articles rather than news reports was unhelpful to decide on a timeframe for me. I am not sure ultimately because I did not follow this energy crisis in the news like I am following this one, and I am also not Moldovan. Nevertheless, I don't see much basis for keeping the current title, which was never elaborated on to begin with. But I'd appreciate it if other users could look into this and comment their own research. Super Ψ Dro 14:10, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

January 20, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Echites panduratus → Loroco – I have no strong opinion about this proposal. My motivation in submitting this title change for consideration is that I know of the plant solely in connection with the many Salvadorean restaurants in my area that serve pupusas stuffed with it, and in that context it's known as "loroco". So, to me, that's its common name. I wanted to see what ideas others have about ascertaining whether it's the WP:COMMONNAME, in the Misplaced Pages sense, in the broader realm of relevant sources in English. Largoplazo (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe 20:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Jafaa (TV Series) → Jafaa – Although the second (below) is currently the primary redirect to its current target, it's been added on so as to convince the admin or page mover post-move discussion so as not to get confused. And although the first was just moved out of the draftspace, pageviews may not be an issue here, especially during the duration of this RM! What do you think? Intrisit (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Discovery One → Discovery (2001 spaceship) – The spaceship is only referred to as "Discovery One" in the film version of the franchise. Every other mention is simply "Discovery": *Novels - 2001, 2010, 2061 & 3001 all mention the spaceship as "Discovery". "Discovery 2" is only mentioned with the suffix once in the novel 2010, at the beginning when Floyd & Moisevitch talk of shoes and spaceships and sealing wax, but mostly of monoliths and malfunctioning computers. From there on, it's just "Discovery" There is no mention of "Discovery One". *Films - 2001 refers to the spaceship as both "Discovery One" and "Discovery" twice. *Films - 2010 refers to the spaceship as "Discovery" in both the opening summary text, and also in the adapted Floyd & Moisevitch discussion, when they play "the truth" with each other. There is a single mention of "Discovery Two" in this conversation. The spaceship is commonly referred to as just "Discovery". Propose changing article name to support this and change to Discovery (2001 spaceship), but I'm open to discussion on alternatives. Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bensci54 (talk) 17:35, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Autonomous university → University autonomy – The article title uses autonomous university as a designation and the examples used in the article are dubious. In Singapore, where it appears to be most used, it seems to be a marketing term that doesn't mean much. Singapore is a less democratic country so it essentially means less state control based on the lost reference used in the article. In Australia, every university is an autonomous university by the same standards but adding that would turn this article into a meaningless list. Same goes with Mexico, which only has one "autonomous" university listed on the article despite being far from the only one. If this article is about a designation, there is nothing to write about and this article loses notability. I am guessing this article may be more relevant to India, but the country doesn't appear to have a designation strictly called "autonomous university". Since this article appears to have no clear purpose, I'm proposing moving this article to university autonomy as on Spanish Misplaced Pages which would broaden the topic. Queen Douglas DC-3 (talk) 10:58, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

January 19, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Behind Enemy Lines (1986 film) → P.O.W. The Escape – The previous discussion that led to the determination that the film's primary title was Behind Enemy Lines appears to have been in error. The biography of actor David Carradine (Endless Highway, p. 553) states that Behind Enemy Lines was the filming title, later changed to P.O.W. The Escape. Every review and advertisement published at the time of the film's domestic opening (such as a free-to-access Los Angeles Times review by Patrick Goldstein), shows that the title had already been changed to P.O.W. The Escape. The American Film Institute catalog also calls it P.O.W. The Escape and identifies Behind Enemy Lines as a working title. Redacwiki (talk) 13:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Gaza War → Gaza War (disambiguation) – * * If supporting, please indicate whether you prefer "Gaza War" or "Gaza War (2023–present)". *WP:COMMONNAME: Either "Gaza war" or its variant "war in Gaza" (or both) are common among every single news source below, including Israeli sources. By contrast, "Israel-Hamas war" or its variants are no longer used at BBC and Al-Jazeera; the Guardian and Haaretz are both 10x more likely to use "Gaza war" than "Israel-Hamas war". Scholarly sources somewhat prefer "Gaza war" (even after we subtract "Israel-Gaza war" from the results). (Side note, WP:NCENPOV requires us to consider names "close enough to be considered variations of the same common name") *WP:CONSISTENT: most major modern wars are simply named after the main location: Vietnam War, War in Afghanistan, Iraq War, Tigray War etc. Where we have two names, they are both countries: Iran-Iraq War, Russo-Ukrainian War etc. "Gaza War" is consistent with these, but "Israel-Hamas war" is not as Hamas has never been a country. *WP:PRECISION, both "Gaza war" and "Israel-Hamas war" have previously been used to refer to other conflicts (eg, 10,000 google hits for "2014 Israel-Hamas war"). Previously there has been consensus that this current war overshadows all previous wars to be the WP:PTOPIC (see here and here). "Gaza War (2023-present)" is more WP:PRECISE, but "Gaza War" is slightly more concise. *WP:NPOVN. Significant POV issues were identified with "Israel-Hamas war" in the last RM, and "Gaza War" solves that. VR (Please ping on reply) 09:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)The move request was modified to indicate the fate of the existing Gaza War page as per this discussion.VR (Please ping on reply) 08:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

January 18, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Harry Stinson → ? – The musician has almost three times as many page views per day relative to the real estate developer, and considerably more inbound links. I personally think the musician should be the primary topic. However, I am not sure what the most concise disambiguation term would be for the real estate developer, as Harry Stinson (real estate developer) seems long and unwieldy. I don't think Harry Edward Stinson should be considered here, as it's been barely sourced since 2008 and has zero to four page views a day. In short, it seems like the musician is the most searched-for of the Harry Stinsons out there and should therefore be the main one. Ten Pound Hammer • 22:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Nanda dynasty → Nanda Empire – The previous move, requested by a prolific LTA, was completely unreasonable. The justification given that—the entity, i.e., the Nanda(s), was itself part of another bigger political entity, i.e., the AfD'd Magadhan Empire—was blatantly a case of pseudo-historical POV-pushing. The "Nanda Empire" is undeniably the most used general term, the very WP:COMMONNAME is indisputably reflected by recent authoritative scholarship: *

    Chandragupta Maurya, who overthrew him, reported to Alexander’s followers that he could easily conquer the Nanda Empire because its king was so much hated and despised by his subjects for "the wickedness of his disposition and meanness of his origin"...."For the first time with the Nandas, we had an empire which transcended the boundaries of the Gangetic basin".

    *

    Alexander crossed the Hindu Kush mountain range in 327 bce, but he then left after a brief sojourn in north-west India. Hence, no direct confrontation between the Greeks and the Nanda Empire occurred...Chandragupta probably first acquired Punjab and then, with the help of Chanakya, moved towards the Nanda Empire.

    *

    The proportion of the population of South Asia claimed by the largest polity in that area, 500 bce to 2000 ce (in percent)...Key: Maghada: 500, 450, 400, 350 BCE; Nanda Empire: 325 BCE; Maurya Empire: 300, 250 BCE; Satavahara: 200 BCE; Shunga Empire: 150, 100 BCE; 50 BCE, 1 CE; Kushan Empire: 50, 100, 150, 200; Gupta Empire

    Garuda 15:10, 11 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 19:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Mani → Mani (disambiguation) – My guess is that Mani the prophet is the primary topic, that most people searching on "mani" are looking for this guy. There are a lot of other things that come under "mani", but none of them are really very notable, whilst Mani the prophet is a world-historical figure of great importance and (I think) fame. The objection would be "well, all these many other mani-things added together are probably equivalent to the one guy or close anyway". There's no way to know if that is true but my guess is not. Also, in the rule somewhere it stays to lean toward the more scientific/serious/long-term-important meaning for a term in cases of doubt. Herostratus (talk) 18:43, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Darlin', Darlin → Darlin', Darlin' – (The article calls it "Darlin', Darlin'" with two apostrophes in pretty much every place and the included image of the original album's cover art seems to also spell it that way (never mind the all-lowercase spelling). And anyway spelling the same word two different ways in the same title looks stupid. JIP | Talk 15:10, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – GeForce 50 series → GeForce RTX 50 series – Including "RTX" in the titles of Misplaced Pages articles about recent ray-tracing enabled NVIDIA GeForce generations is important for several reasons:
    * Brand Recognition: "RTX" has become synonymous with NVIDIA's ray-tracing technology. By including "RTX" in the title, readers immediately associate the product with NVIDIA's specific technology and branding.
    * Clarity and Specificity: NVIDIA uses "RTX" to distinguish its GPUs that support real-time ray tracing, AI cores and other advanced graphics features from previous generations and competitors' products. Including "RTX" helps clarify which GPUs are equipped with these advanced capabilities.
    * Marketing and Differentiation: NVIDIA heavily markets its RTX GPUs as superior for real-time ray tracing and AI-enhanced graphics processing. Including "RTX" in the title reinforces this marketing message and differentiates NVIDIA's products in a competitive market.
    * Search Engine Optimization (SEO): Including "RTX" in the title improves search engine visibility and makes it easier for users searching specifically for NVIDIA's ray-tracing enabled GPUs to find relevant information quickly.
    Overall, "RTX" is a crucial part of NVIDIA's branding strategy and helps both consumers and enthusiasts identify and understand the advanced capabilities of their GPUs.
    Casting @4202C @LengthyMer @Maxeto0910 @AP 499D25 Artem S. Tashkinov (talk) 11:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 09:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

January 17, 2025

  • (Discuss) – History of the Jews in the United States → Jewish history in the United States – I would like to request this move as I believe the target article title is more natural and succinct. In being titled “Jewish history in the United States”, my proposed title also avoids simply referring to “the Jews”, which is not inaccurate but doesn’t reflect the history of American Jews rather than Jews in general being the primary focus of this article (although see the paragraph below). I did think about American Jewish history (currently a redirect) as an article title, but I prefer “Jewish history in the United States” as it seems to have a wider scope, for example including within scope the history of Jews in the territory of the US before American independence. That said, as I have written above, the main focus of this article is on American Jews. I’m conscious there are many other articles on Misplaced Pages titled “History of the Jews in X”. I similarly think these would generally be better titled as “Jewish history in X” for the same reasons of naturalness, succinctness and precision. Although I haven’t made this a multi-page move due to the scale of making such a wide-ranging change. I’d welcome more experienced editors’ views about this. I’d suggest, if this move request is not successful, that Jewish history in the United States be created as a redirect to this page. As it’s quite a natural search term. Finally, I would note my proposed title aligns with the main article on Jewish history. Rafts of Calm (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:15, 9 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 15:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

January 16, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Use of Sarum → Sarum Missal – Or Sarum Rite – While the current title has considerable prevalence, it is no common name and its prevalence is no greater than the alternatives – both of which provide considerablly greater descriptive utility, outlining the subject as a missal or rite (and a more easily recognisable ecclesiastical category of subject), rather than merely a "use of", which is a descriptively unhelpful phrase. A-Z encyclopedias would opt to format a title such as this as "Sarum, Use of" to ensure the page listing in the "S"s rather than the "U"s. While this doesn't apply here, the same principle of having the more important key word up front does still benefit drop down menu searches and the like, which, combined with the historically greater prevalence of "Sarum Missal" name format simply reinforces the merit of the move. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:15, 2 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0  16:27, 9 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 23:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Spanish Christian–Muslim War of 1172–1212 → Almohad period in the Reconquista – New proposal: Almohad–Christian conflicts - The current title is incorrect because it was not a war, it was a process/period. Before creating this article, I was looking for information about the Reconquista and found this book: * Charles, Phillips (2004). Encyclopedia of Wars (PDF). Facts On File. ISBN 9780816028511. I saw that it mentioned several "Spanish Christian–Muslim Wars" and, after finding more sources that mention this, I decided to create an article about it. However, I now think this title is incorrect for several reasons: I found some sources that talk about a war between 1172–1212 but they are still very few and probably unreliable (cited at the start of the article, probably all of them mention it because it is in the Encyclopedia of Wars), there are more sources that mention those dates to refer to the Almohad period in the Reconquista or Almohad rule in al-Andalus/Spain . As @عبدالرحمن4132 said in the section above, the Almohads were already fighting the Christians before 1172 and continued after 1212 (although I defended the current title because I incorrectly thought it was a war). I have also noticed that there are sources that refer to the "peace treaty of 1212" as a truce and that, according to most of the sources , it actually happened in 1214, which contradicts the date. I have looked at the wars listed in the Encyclopedia of Wars (on which many of the sources that mention this "war" are based) and there are some that have inaccurate dates and even some that are not wars, but periods/processes (like this one). Some examples are: Almohad Conquest of Muslim Spain (period); Almoravid Conquest of Muslim Spain (period ); Spanish conquest of Chile (period ); Spanish-Portuguese War (1580–1589) (wrong date: different wars/campaigns ); etc. I have requested moving the article to "Almohad period in the Reconquista", but "Almohad period in the Iberian Peninsula", "Almohad period in Spain", "Almohad intervention in the Reconquista", "Almohad conflicts in the Iberian Peninsula" and others might also work. I will add and adapt the information in the article depending on the title change (if the move is successful). --RobertJohnson35 (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 23:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

January 15, 2025

  • (Discuss) – Alberto Baio → Alberto Costa (footballer, born 2003) – I have no idea why the man whose surname is Baio is referred to as Alberto Costa (could be a case like Nuno Gomes where a player takes an idol's surname as a nickname) but it seems to be undisputed as a preferred name. Juventus announced his transfer in Italian and English with no mention of "Baio". See independent press such as Gazzetta dello Sport Corriere dello Sport La Stampa Sky Italia . In his native Portugal I only used to see "Costa" in very local sources but it's now in Record O Jogo . A strange turn of events that throws up more questions than answers Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:19, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Elapsed listings

Shortcut The 7-day listing period has elapsed. Items below may be closed if there's a consensus, or if discussion has run its course and consensus could not be achieved.
  • (Discuss) – Stanley Green → Stanley Owen Green – Protein Man is not well known outside of London. The historian is far better known internationally (has biographical entries in British and American encyclopedias) and is covered in many more published reference works. If there is a primary it should be the historian. However, I think there is a good argument that there is WP:NOPRIMARY and the disambiguation page should take precedence. It's totally inappropriate to have an obscure UK person as the primary even if it is an FA article. I also note that there are many many more incoming links to the historian page versus only a tiny handful to Protein Man. 4meter4 (talk) 08:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Backlog

Shortcut Elapsed listings fall into the backlog after 24 hours. Consider relisting 8-day-old discussions with minimal participation.
  • (Discuss) – Godi media → Coverage of Narendra Modi in the Indian media – The current title is a neologism, and is not an English phrase. It may be notable as a phrase, but is not an appropriate article title. The alleged phenomenon of positive media coverage of Modi needs a neutral and descriptive title. The odd title has also led to nonsensical sentences such as "The phenomenon of Godi Media is not unique to India", under the section "International perspectives", which is going to be incomprehensible to most international readers. The neologism could arguably get a standalone article, but is probably best covered within this article at a new title. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:54, 6 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe 12:23, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Moldova and the Russo-Ukrainian War → Russian hybrid warfare against Moldova – This article is a compilation of actions that Russia has done to undermine and destabilize Moldova in the last years. They have happened during the Russo-Ukrainian War, but are part of a single coordinated effort and plan. We can rename the article so it covers this more precise and encyclopedic topic. We have a lot of sources describing this hybrid warfare that Russia is doing against Moldova. Here are some big names: the Institute for the Study of War ("The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine is, in fact, supporting Russian hybrid warfare efforts in former Soviet states, particularly Moldova and Georgia"), the European Parliament ("vehemently condemns Russia's escalating malicious activities, interference and hybrid operations ahead of Moldovans going to the polls"), Politico citing Moldova's chief of police ("Moldova is facing a phenomenon of voter bribery, combined with hybrid warfare and disinformation, the likes of which our country has never seen before,"), Euronews ("the Kremlin has enacted elements of its hybrid war playbook in both states "), NATO itself ("In Moldova, Russia’s hybrid warfare has been aimed at toppling the country’s pro-EU government"). This hybrid warfare scheme would have involved many actions and events that are either already in the article or would have been had the article been written later. This article, currently with a vague and open scope, is the best recipient for this topic. Here are sources mentioning these actions as hybrid warfare: Russian-paid protests in Moldova (: "Russia has dedicated considerable resources to its hybrid war. For instance, protestors are routinely paid to participate in anti-government protests.", page 6; : "It later emerged that protesters had been paid by Kremlin proxies to attend." in an article about Russian hybrid warfare in Moldova), continuous airspace violations and falling of drones and missiles (: "The overall internal security situation remains stable, but fragile due to regular incidents such as bomb hoaxes and missiles or missile debris falling on Moldovan territory. in a section regarding hybrid warfare, page 258), Transnistria's role in this effort (: "Chisinau has been the victim of a complex hybrid action carried out by the Kremlin on multiple levels. In this respect, the Transnistria region has long been used by Russia as a bargaining chip in its efforts to influence Republic of Moldova."), rigging of elections and vote-buying (: "Indeed, Moldova's election season was marred by massive Russian interference in both campaigns. This meddling included cyberattacks, planned espionage at diaspora polling stations, and the outright buying of votes."; : "Recent votes in the former Soviet states of Georgia and Moldova have been dogged by interference from Russian-backed elements.", "There is a suggestion that these efforts are part of Russia’s multifaceted hybrid warfare."), an alleged coup in February 2023 (: "The timely leak of classified information about Russia's attempts to organize a coup in Chisinau allowed the government to react quickly", page 49, see source's title) and energy blackmail and the energy crisis of 2022 and 2023 (same source and page as before: "Thanks to substantial financial aid from the EU, Moldova was able to survive Russia’s energy blackmail in 2022 and even break Gazprom's monopoly."). This source summarizes everything nicely: Moldova's Response to Hybrid Attacks: A Learning-by-doing Strategy, page 2, "In addition to the potential risks coming from Transnistria, Moldova has witnessed a series of new challenges over the past year and a half, ranging from false bomb alerts, cyber-attacks, and explosions in Transnistria to energy blackmail, paid protests, and Kremlin proxies operating in the autonomous region of Gagauzia. This is all alongside continuous disinformation campaigns.". Note that I've only looked at English-language sources, and several of these sources are written by Moldovans themselves. Here are some random academic sources that I didn't use above . I think no doubt remains that sources verify that Russia is waging hybrid warfare against Moldova. Do you agree that this article should cover this topic? Super Ψ Dro 12:47, 30 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:24, 6 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Safari Scribe 12:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Carter Harrison Sr. → Carter Harrison III – Wrong name suffixes: These are two mayors of Chicago, a father (born 1825) and son (born 1865) both named Carter Henry Harrison. Somehow, Misplaced Pages articles have used the suffixes "Sr." and "Jr." for these two men, but later editors have noted them as "III" and "IV", and external sources seem to always refer to them as "III" and "IV". The Misplaced Pages articles seem to have no explanation of why "Sr." and "Jr." are used on Misplaced Pages. In 2017, another user noted one misnaming at Talk:Carter Harrison Jr.#Not a Junior. It appears that these two articles, and their attendant Commons categories, should be renamed; this seems uncontroversial, but I'm nominating for discussion out of an abundance of caution, in case I'm missing something, because I almost can't believe that these article titles have remained wrong for 20+ years. Closeapple (talk) 02:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Deep state in the United States → Deep state conspiracy theory in the United States – As provided by the numerous sources in a prior RfC on this article's talk page (and a simple Google search), multiple reliable sources are calling the deep state in the United States a political conspiracy theory. While the page for deep state itself discusses use of the term in historical and contemporary instances where there is and is not an actual "deep state", the overwhelming number of sources in regards to the United States explicitly state that such claims are a conspiracy theory. A brief paragraph in a background section can discuss use of the term in pre-Trump years, but such discussion is eclipsed by the amount of sources describing its use in more contemporary sources. I propose that the article title be renamed to better reflect the consensus of reliable sources. BootsED (talk) 02:02, 6 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Typhoon Ewiniar (2006) → Typhoon Ewiniar – Out of the three storms (2024, 2000, and 2006, this is the most powerful. (I'm going to exclude 2000, since it doesn't have a page). 2006 has more deaths, damages, and injuries than the 2024 version. The 2006 version affected five countries, while the 2024 version affected two countries. Since the 2006 version has more deaths, damages, injuries, and countries affected, it therefore has more coverage and popularity (and also historical impact). 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 00:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Steven Crossin 05:29, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Snow tire → Winter tire – Article is for both 'winter tire' and 'snow tire', but the former is by far the more utilized phrase. Further, people are regularly confused that snow tires are only for snow, and that there is no improvement in having winter tires when it is cold but not snowy, which is not the case, and dangerous. Excelsiorsbanjo (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steven Crossin 13:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Stanisław Lem and robots → Robots of Stanisław Lem – restore the original title. The article is about robots in the scifi works of Stanislaw Lem and the current title is an unnecessary broadening of the scope. There is nothing else to say about "robots and Lem". And there never will be because Lem is dead and will never have a chance to meet any robot (and he never interacted with robots in the past). I have no idea how this weird title was justified. --Altenmann >talk 02:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Paris Saint-Germain Youth Academy → Paris Saint-Germain Youth Academy – – A November 2024 RM failed, but it's unclear on what grounds. The current title, "Paris Saint-Germain Academy", refers to a program run by PSG for children across the world, giving them an opportunity to do training sessions under the PSG name and to improve on their game. It refers to this, with an example being the "France" academy here. These "schools" run by this "PSG Academy" program are NOT the actual youth academy this article is referring to. This article refers to the players that are in what is called in French the centre de formation, and by extension, those in the préformation. The article is referring to the players actually in PSG's youth system that ultimately goes up to the club's first team. And this youth system is NOT known by the name "Paris Saint-Germain Academy", both in sourcing and especially not by the club itself. The club calls its youth academy the centre de formation here, which it itself translates to "Paris Saint-Germain Youth Academy" on the same page in English. Paul Vaurie (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – KAYO → ? – Not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the undisambiguated name. This is apparently a relatively new company launched within the past year, but KAYO has also been the call sign of at least two radio stations in the United States — formerly what's now KDDS-FM in metro Seattle and currently KAYO (FM) in Alaska, and there's also a current radio station in metro Seattle which officially has the call sign KYYO but uses the "KAYO" spelling in its branding because it's intentionally playing on the history of KDDS. So there are at least three other competing topics here, meaning that a disambiguation page is needed.
    Since this article doesn't clarify whether "KAYO" is an acronym for anything or not, I'm leaving the new title open for discussion — if it's an acronym then we could expand it to the full words, or if it's not then we could go with KAYO (Albania), but some move or other is needed as this absolutely can't claim to be the most prominent use of the plain undisambiguated title "KAYO". Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Stadion Miejski (Białystok) → Białystok Municipal Stadium – I am submitting this request to revert the article title of the stadium in Białystok to its previous title, Białystok Municipal Stadium in light of recent actions by the user FromCzech. The move to the Polish-language title Stadion Miejski (Białystok) was made unilaterally and appears inconsistent with Misplaced Pages's guidelines, specifically WP:UE. This guideline encourages the use of English translations where appropriate to maintain accessibility for the global readership. FromCzech has argued for the name change without prior discussion, potentially as a reaction to a naming debate on Lokotrans Aréna that I initiated. This recent move does not reflect a consensus, and it also disrupts the established consistency within the "Football venues in Poland" category, where nearly all stadium names are translated into English. Notable examples include Father Władysław Augustynek Stadium, Gdynia Municipal Stadium, Kielce Municipal Stadium, and Raków Municipal Stadium. I urge that the title "Białystok Municipal Stadium" be restored to uphold Misplaced Pages’s principles of consistency and transparency, while also preventing this matter from being affected by personal disputes or editing motivated by anything other than Misplaced Pages's editorial standards. Paradygmaty (talk) 21:09, 5 November 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – KN-02 Toksa → Hwasong-11 – These cases are similar to Hwasong-7 and Hwasong-10. The Hwasong-7 and Hwasong-10 are commonly referred to using external name given by United States (Rodong/Nodong and Musudan, respectively). These articles using official North Korea desginations. According to a The Hankyoreh article (here), "In many cases, the names given by other countries have entered more common usage than the names given by the countries that actually produced them. This has to do with the practice of most countries declining to give the actual name of missiles in the development stages or actual key use, due to reasons of military secrecy". KN-02, KN-06 and KN-19 have official North Korean designation (Hwasong-11, Pongae-5 and Kumsong-3, respectively), suggesting the revelation of official names. The M142 HIMARS (whose common name is HIMARS), and UGM-133 Trident II (whose common name is Trident II or Trident II D5) using official United States's designations, therefore, it seems unfair for North Korean missile articles to use the US designation (KN-xx) as title, although the official North Korean designations are known. And the common name policy appears to be not suitable for these cases. Therefore, the above articles (KN-02 Toksa, KN-06 and KN-19) should be moved per above. TCU9999 (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Dextroamphetamine → Dexamfetamine – To conform with Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles which specifies that articles on drugs should use the INN (dexamfetamine) as the article title. This was requested as a technical move, but contested on the grounds that the current title is in common usage in certain areas of the field of medicine (i.e. the US). I would argue that the entire point of Misplaced Pages adopting a standard such as the use of the INN is to avoid favouring one area of usage over another, for example the use of the INN Paracetamol as an article title over the US English Acetominophin. Further afield, the usage of Aluminium over Aluminum clearly demonstrates that common usage in US English is not sufficient grounds to prefer a US English name over the accepted standard name. Dalziel 86 (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Kill Bill (SZA song) → Kill Bill (song) – The SZA song has hit the top 5 in several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and Ireland. In addition, it was nominated for the Grammy Award for Song of the Year and the Grammy Award for Record of the Year.
    There is only one other song with the same name with a Misplaced Pages article, and that is the Brown Eyed Girls song. The article in question is much shorter with much fewer references, and it has no charting information in the way that the SZA song does.
    Finally, looking at ], the SZA song has over 100x the pageviews as the Brown Eyed Girls song, and with much less time to do so, as the Brown Eyed Girls song had its page created in 2014, and the SZA song was released in 2022.
    For the above reasons, I believe that the SZA song is the primary topic with respect to songs. N0nuun (talk) 19:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Oleg of Drelinia → Oleg of Dereva – "drelinia" appears to be an WP:OR toponym, it is not widely attested in English-language WP:RS. Therefore, as pointed out in 2011 by User:Ghirlandajo, there is no such term as "drelinia". It was a good thing he decided rename the article to "Oleg of the Drevlyans", although that is still not quite what the text says. (Some English literature suggests "Oleg among the Derevlyans", but only for translating this specific sentence in PVL 69.8–9). Nevertheless, in 2018 this was reverted back to "Oleg of Drelinia" by User:Iryna Harpy with the comment revert: Undiscussed move. Drelinia is attested to in English language texts, whether correct or incorrect. Is WP:OR as WP:TITLE. Well, I could find only 1 hit on Google Books (Ase Berit, Rolf Strandskogen 2015, which may have been influenced by this enwiki article), and 0 hits on Google Scholar. So let's get back to the basics. The land in question is simply called Дерева Dereva, which in modern Ukrainian and Russian still simply means "the trees" or "the woods" (plural; in singular wikt:дерево), i.e. "the Woods". * Въ лѣто 6478. Святославъ посади Яропълка въ Кыевѣ, а Ольга въ Деревѣхъ. (PVL 69.8–9 Ostrowski et al. 2003 ** Vŭ lěto 6478. Svyatoslavŭ posadi Yaropolŭka vŭ Kyevŭ, a Olĭga vŭ Derevěkhŭ. *** 6478 (970). Svyatoslav set up Yaropolk in Kiev and Oleg in Dereva. Cross&SW 1953 p. 87 деревѣхъ (derevěkhŭ) is the plural locative of дерево in Old East Slavic. It literally means "in the woods". Sometimes it is nevertheless translated as Derevlyans or some spelling variation of that ethnonym (e.g. Thuis 2015 Derevljanen), but in this case, it is a toponym, referring to a land (Dereva "the Woods") and not to a people (Derevlyans "the Wood-Dwellers"). In 12 cases in total, Cross&SW rendered the toponym as Dereva, and never as "Drelinia". In the incident in which Oleg kills Lyut', Oleg's hunting grounds are similarly called "in the forest", but with a different word: въ лѣсѣ vŭ lěsě (PVL 74.12–14; Cross&SW p. 90). Compare with the next event (1): *В лѣто 6485. Поиде Яропълкъ на Ольга, брата своего, на Деревьску землю. PVL 74.22–23 ** Vŭ lěto 6485. Poide Yaropŭlkŭ na Olĭga, brata svoego, na Derevĭsku zemlyu. *** 6484-6485 (976-977). Yaropolk marched against his brother Oleg into the district of Dereva. p. 90 Compare with a previous event (2): *И послуша ихъ Игорь; иде въ Дерева въ дань. PVL 54.20 ** I poslusha ikhŭ Igorĭ; ide vŭ Dereva vŭ danĭ. *** Igor' heeded their words, and he attacked Dereva in search of tribute. p. 78 Some English-language literature suggests simply Oleg of Dereva, or Oleg Sviatoslavich of Dereva. Going by our own enwiki conventions, we could also go for Oleg, Prince of Dereva, but that has the problem of translating knyaz, which is a whole other discussion that we better avoid. interwikis suggest Oleg Sviatoslavich (Prince of Dereva or Oleg Sviatoslavich (Derevlyan prince) (but those would not conform to enwiki conventions), or simply Oleg Sviatoslavich (but that already redirects to Oleg I of Chernigov). All things considered, Oleg of Dereva is the most obvious title: it conforms to our conventions, it is WP:CONCISE, it is somewhat attested in literature, plus Dereva separately is overwhelmingly attested in English-language literature as the toponym's WP:COMMONNAME. The current title is WP:OR and cannot be maintained anymore, and the other options all have certain problems that Oleg of Dereva does not have. NLeeuw (talk) 15:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Cabinet of Germany → Federal Government of Germany – "Federal Government of Germany" is the natural, precise, concise and above all consistent title. On the other hand, "Cabinet of Germany" is not commonly recognizable and not a title that readers are likely to look or search for if they wanted to find the German government. Furthermore, the current title is colloquial and legally (see Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, sixth section, "VI. The Federal Government") and technically incorrect. The title also differs from all other search engine results on this topic and the official website itself.

References

  1. Mackenzie, John, ed. (2016-01-12). "Nanda Empire". The Encyclopedia of Empire (1 ed.). Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118455074. ISBN 978-1-118-44064-3.
  2. Roy, Kaushik (2012-10-15). Hinduism and the Ethics of Warfare in South Asia: From Antiquity to the Present. Cambridge University Press. pp. 61–62. ISBN 978-1-107-01736-8.
  3. Bang, Peter Fibiger; Bayly, Christopher Alan; Scheidel, Walter (2021). The Oxford World History of Empire. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN 978-0-19-977236-0.
  4. "Ex-Memphis Officer Charged in Tyre Nichols' Death Will Plead Guilty to Murder, Faces 15 Years in Prison".
  5. "A former Memphis officer pleads guilty to charges in Tyre Nichols' beating death". NPR. 2 November 2023.
  6. https://gazette.govt.nz/notice/id/2024-ln6544
  7. https://www.linz.govt.nz/consultations/waimarino
  8. https://greekreporter.com/2025/01/08/first-case-hmpv-virus-greece/
  9. https://www.greekcitytimes.com/2025/01/08/greece-confirms-first-case-of-hmpv-raises-concerns/amp/
  10. First HMPV Case Detected in Romania, Raising Concerns "Romania has confirmed its first case of human metapneumovirus (HMPV), a contagious respiratory virus currently circulating globally."
  11. Azmi, Amalia (4 January 2025). "Malaysia recorded 327 hMPV cases in 2024, disease not new - Ministry". NST Online. Retrieved 4 January 2025.
  12. "HMPV in India: Two 3-month-old and 8-month-old babies detected with the virus, confirms government". The Times of India. 2025-01-06. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2025-01-06.
  13. https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Federal+Government+of+Germany%2CCabinet+of+Germany&year_start=1840&year_end=2022&corpus=en&smoothing=3&case_insensitive=false#
  14. https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=Cabinet%7CGovernment
  15. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en
— Essixt (talk) 12:00, 6 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. —CX Zoom 16:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:50, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Tel al-Sultan attack → Kuwait Peace Camp airstrike – The current title is not great: it's not particularly natural, precise or descriptive, but is merely a vague and fairly non-descript geographical handwave. The more natural titling surrounding the event in question has tended to revolve around the nomenclature of "Rafah tent ..." or "Rafah tent camp ..." (with attack/massacre as the operative descriptor) but these options equally lack precision (given there have been numerous tent camp attacks/massacres in Rafah). And yet "Tel al-Sultan" ironically isn't that much of an improvement, since Tel al-Sultan is equally not a specific city block or even neighborhood, but a substantial urban area within Rafah, and the attack also did not even really take place in Tel al-Sultan, but at a temporary tent camp on a previously deserted patch of land to the northeast of some UN warehouses that were themselves located to the northeast of Tel al-Sultan, on the other side of a peripheral ring road. The current title also does not mention either the key words "tent" or "camp" and is entirely obscure, non-descript and wholly unnatural as a search term. By contrast, the "Kuwait Peace Camp" is the precise location of the attack, as first attested by the BBC on 27 May based on the video footage, and confirmed by the Guardian and CNN on 29 May, and used as the principle identifier by Amnesty by 27 August. So this name represents the precise location of the attack and as a bonus contains the keyword "camp", so further specifies the nature of the event. And then "airstrike", because it was an airstrike, so that's precise, and the news coverage largely uses the term "strike". Meanwhile, the use of "attack" in the context is somewhat vague and could be confused with a ground assault, of which there have since been many in the area. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Use of child suicide bombers by Palestinian militant groups → Suicide bombing by minors in the Second Intifada – This page can readily be moved to a much more precise and specific title. The current title is somewhat vague and broad in scope when the topic itself is quite narrow and discrete. The topic in question is suicide bombing by minors in the Second Intifada. "Minors" is more useful here than "child", as it pertains to the internationally defined (and most common) age of legal adulthood as being at 18, and the topic here is bombings by 16 and 17 year olds, so shortly below this legal threshold. The qualitative terminology of "children" or "childhood" is vaguer and conjures up the sense of individuals in their early teens or younger just as readily as it does the sense of those in their late teens but prior to legal maturity. The "Second Intifada" is the very precise and discrete time period in question, the when of the topic and a delineation that should obviously be mentioned in the lead (as part of the WP:NCWWW of the topic). This is very explicitly not a general topic page or broad concept article, but one very specifically linked to said time period. The mention that the subject involves "Palestinian militant groups" is lengthy and unnecessary. This element is naturally outlined as part of the WP:SCOPE in the first sentence of the page, but is in any case implied by the context of the "Second Intifada", which makes it clear that the broader topic is the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, where such tactics in the relevant period were the preserve of only side. This makes the specific mention of this element of the subject fairly redundant and unnecessary in the title. Iskandar323 (talk) 07:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Gascon dialect → Gascon (language variety) – The precise classifcation of Gascon is controversial. While most scholars consider it to be a dialect of Occitan, Posner and Sala note that it is less comprehensible than Catalan (which is typically classified separately from Occitan) to other southern Occitan speakers. Moreover, Gascon has a standardized variety, Aranese, with official status in the Val d'Aran region of Catalonia, which differs from the literary standard of Occitan. Kristol 2023 asserts that Gascon was "already considered a specific language in the Middle Ages," and Carles and Glessgen 2024 refer to Occitan and Gascon as "two languages." As the terms "language" and "dialect" are ambiguous and somewhat subjective, linguists tend to circumvent extralinguistic polemics by using the term "language variety" to refer to a linguistic system. By characterizing Gascon as a "dialect," the current title appears to clash with Misplaced Pages's policy of neutrality by favouring a traditional but contested view. The term "language variety" would be a more useful characterization, as it would avoid the use of the ambiguous term "dialect," which tends to evoke social, historical, and political considerations rather than strictly linguistic ones. Conocephalus (talk) 15:07, 4 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958 18:40, 11 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:40, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – FC Cetatea Suceava → CSM Cetatea Suceava – – After the dissolution of ACS Foresta Suceava in the summer of 2024, the Municipality of Suceava and the most important businessmen from Suceava County re-founded the local club as CSM Cetatea 1932 Suceava (full name). The new entity is considered now as the team of the city and the successor of the local football history.frf-ajf profile, facebook profile, radiotio.ro/foundation, history, local businessman, staff, municipality involvment, continuity. Suceava had only one important football team at one time, during the years, and at this moment the history of local football is very divided on wikipedia. Th football history of Suceava started with Cetatea Suceava in 1932, then in the 1950s and 1960s the team changed its name several times, then was re-founded as a football section of CSM Suceava, multi-sport club, where it was active until 1997, when Foresta Fălticeni, club owned by Eugen Huțu moved to Suceava and was renamed as Foresta Suceava. After 2004, the local club was re-founded as FC Cetatea Suceava (this page) and worked until 2010 when whitdrew from the league. In 2010, Rapid CFR (which was a team from the suburbs) was taking over by the Municipality of Suceava and renamed as ACS Foresta Suceava, the team was dissolved in 2024. Due to this history, I proposed only 3 main pages: 1. CSM Cetatea Suceava (CSM Suceava + FC Cetatea Suceava + Cetatea 1932, one article, keeping the foundation years and the corresponding denomination(s) 2. Foresta Fălticeni remain the same, team originally based in Fălticeni 3. ACS Foresta Suceava, remain the same, team that was known for almost its entire history as Rapid CFR Suceava, another team moved and renamed. The second step will be a merge between Cetatea Suceava (reunited page) and CSM Suceava, but I'll keep the entire history on this page, because Cetatea was the original team of Suceava, CSM was born by the took over of Cetatea (named Chimia at that time), by CSM Suceava multi-sport club. Rhinen (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. Rickershauser, Peter (March 1972). "Jersey Central had a great fall". Trains. Vol. 32, no. 5. pp. 20–28.
  2. Higgs, Larry (September 16, 2008). "Train tragedy memorialized". Asbury Park Press. p. 27. Retrieved December 23, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
Mackensen (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
  • (Discuss) – Matthew Shepard → Murder of Matthew Shepard – Per WP:DEATHS and WP:ONEEVENT. This is going to be controversial but still it should be done. He has no notability besides his murder. He became famous because he died and before that he was a complete unknown. People might say he has been notable in other things but that is only a consequence of being murdered. People should leave their emotional bias behind and look at the facts. Another option is to split an article called "Murder of Matthew Shepard” about the death itself while the notability and legacy will remain in the main article. Theparties (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Malformed requests

See "Bot considerations"
  • Talk:Kerolin – Pagename to be moved listed below template does not match name in template: Kerolin.

Possibly incomplete requests

See "Request all associated moves explicitly"

References

References generally should not appear here. Use {{reflist-talk}} in the talk page section with the requested move to show references there. Category:
Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Current discussions Add topic