Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flameviper

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Flameviper (talk | contribs) at 14:50, 13 June 2007 (ATTENTION FROM ADMINISTRATORS GREATLY APPRECIATED!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:50, 13 June 2007 by Flameviper (talk | contribs) (ATTENTION FROM ADMINISTRATORS GREATLY APPRECIATED!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Flameviper (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to...

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to... |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to... |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Please put this page on your watchlist, I need someone to talk to... |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I never made an "abusive sockpuppet". Two-Sixteen never would have been banned if you thought he was a different person than me. It may as well have been another person.

Why should my treatment as Two-Sixteen have differed from my treatment as Flameviper?
That difference in treatment, my friends, is why I was banned.
I never did anything that was outright evil. I never made personal attacks, I didn't vandalise anything, I didn't violate 3RR or any of the other infinite rules.
All I did was say something to Elaragirl. On her talk page.
At the top of her talk page, IN BRIGHT RED LETTERS NO LESS, was a notice from Elaragirl that basically stated that on her talk page, one could be less constrained than normally.
So I went ahead and spoke my mind. I told her that we were either going to get along or not get along, basically. And that's what I meant. It wasn't intended to be a "personal attack" and both of us acknowledged that. I e-mailed her later on and apoligized for being rude, and she basically told be that it was no big deal and that she didn't mind.
But it doesn't matter whether I actually violated a rule or not. Metros, who had been riding my ass for the last month or so, seized the opportunity to attack me for the "violation of policy". Techincally, it was a violation of policy, but it wasn't really; the same way that lending someone your money isn't the same as being robbed.
If Metros hadn't been riding my ass for the month previous to that, I never would have been banned. It's as simple as that; when you try to find fault in someone, you will do so.
So after a few months of silent reflection that I had imposed upon myself, I decided to start again. I had tried to contact the administrators through every other avenue; my talk page, e-mail, the mailing list, everything. My talk page was locked for "unblock abuse" even though I was just trying to have a conversation. My e-mails to administrators were ignored. The mailing list was of no help whatsoever.
I had no choice but to create a sockpuppet.
You caused this through your own ignoring of my attempts to contact you.

~ Flameviper 14:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Category:
User talk:Flameviper Add topic