Misplaced Pages

Herbert Dingle

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Electrodynamicist (talk | contribs) at 15:33, 2 August 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:33, 2 August 2007 by Electrodynamicist (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Herbert Dingle (18901978) was an English astronomer and president of the Royal Astronomical Society. He is best-known for his claim to have found an inconsistency in the theory of special relativity.

Born in 1890, Dingle was educated at Plymouth Science, Art and Technical Schools and Imperial College, London. He was a member of the British government eclipse expeditions of 1927 and 1932; and became Professor of Natural Philosophy, Imperial College in 1938, Professor of History and Philosophy of Science, University College London in 1946–1955 and President of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1951–1953. Appointed Professor Emeritus of History and Philosophy of Science in 1955, he died in 1978.

Originally a supporter of Einstein's work on the theory of relativity and an author of the textbook Relativity for All (1922), Dingle came to doubt its foundations after reading an account of the so-called twin paradox. According to this, a clock that moves relative to another will appear to run more slowly as judged by the stationary clock and inversely. Dingle claimed that Einstein's results were inconsistent with those worked out using a "commonsense" method. However, other experts — notably the astrophysicist Sir William H. McCrea — disagreed. The arguments between Dingle and McCrea in Nature are well-known. A recent biographical sketch of McCrea has labeled these friendly but heated exchanges as "part of the legend of the early days of relativity", and Dingle's claim is no longer an active area of debate within the mainstream physics community.

Draft Revision

Introduction

Herbert Dingle was a 20th century physicist, philosopher and historian of science, author of scientific books, and an untiring critic of science and scientific method. He is best known for his criticism of the special theory of relativity, stemming from controversies over the twins paradox in the 1950s, and his book Science At The Crossroads which documented how the scientific community attempted to suppress his heterodox viewpoint. He is most famous for his assertion that the special theory of relativity contains a mathematical inconsistency which invalidates it.

Life

Dingle was born in London August 2, 1890, of Cornish ancestry. He was raised in Plymouth by his mother, who moved there following the death of his father. He left school at age fourteen in order to work, but he continued his studies at night. In 1915 at age 24, he won a Royal Scholarship for physics at Imperial College, London. He was appointed to the department staff there prior to his graduation in 1918, and remained at Imperial College for many more years. Upon graduation he was married to Alice Westacott. They had one son. Both died before Dingle, who died in Hull on September 4, 1978 shortly after his 88 birthday.

Academic Life

Dingle was an academic by profession. He trained to be a physicist, and worked in the field of spectroscopy. At imperial College he worked in the department where Norman Lockyer had been section head, followed by Alfred Flower. Dingle became spectroscopy section head in 1935. In 1937 he was appointed to a chair in natural philosophy. During the second world war, Dingle took responsibility for running of the physics department in the absence of its formal leader. In 1946 , Dingle left Imperial College to take the position of Professor and head of the history and philosophy of science department at University College, London. He remained there until he retired in 1955.

As a result of his spectroscopy work, he was elected president of The Royal Astronomical Society in 1951, serving until 1953. He was President of the History of Astronomy Comission of the International astronomical Union. (More to be added here)

Professional Work

Dingle’s professional work can be divided into three areas: spectroscopy and astrophysics, natural philosophy, and relativity. In the case of relativity, his most famous work occurred after his retirement.

Spectroscopy and Astrophysics need To Add Natural Philosophy need to add Special Relativity

Dingle tells us that he studued natural philosophy under Alferd North Whitehead. It was Whitehead who persuaded him that relativity was valid. In 1922 he published his first relativity book Relativity For All. It was a popular exposition that appeared at the height of popular interest in relativity following the eclipse expedition of 1918 which declared that the theory had been proven. In 1940, Dingle published his second relativity book titled, The Special Theory Of relativity. This was an intermediate level textbook to introduce relativity to college students, that was highly successful, although it was attacked by mainstream relativists who tried to suppress it. His third and last book Science At The Crossroads book appeared in 1971. It documents his challenge to the relativity establishment regarding his claims of an inconsistency in the theory and the methods used to suppress his view, without answering the challenge to prove that his claims were false.

Special Relativity Controversies

Dingle’s claim of an inconsistency in the special theory of relativity occurred after many years of controversy were already behind him. The first controversy erupted in 1939 when he published a paper in Nature which asserted that it was not correct to state that according to relativity moving clocks run slow. His argument was based on his discovery of a mathematical demonstration that there were clocks that did not obey this claim. He was subsequently attacked for this claim and a bitter exchange of letters occurred in the pages of Nature. The essence of the controversy was the claim by Dingle’s critics that his demonstration did not use a legitimate clock and therefore was invalid. Dingle resisted this assertion and stuck to his claim. He asserted that the claim of relativity should be changed to assert that it was the time scale of physics that was changed by relative motion and not the rate of a clock. He asserted that this did not invalidate relativity, but that it showed a need to correct the calibration of clocks that did not obey the time transformation law of relativity.

In 1940 the controversy was revived by Paul Epstein who used it as an opportunity to criticise Dingle’s book the special theory of relativity. Another acrimonious exchange of letters occurred, but this time in the American Journal Of Physics. The issues of the previous debate were revisited by Epstein who added an additional major criticism of Dingle‘s book, that it did not teach the operational method. The issues discussed included the adequacy of the operational method, the reality of the Lorentz contraction, and the legitimacy of Dingle’s clocks. Eventually Einstein’s protégé, Leopold Infeld, published a paper which appeared to resolved the dispute by asserting his agreement with Paul Epstein. However, none of the disputed issues were actually resolved.

In 1955 Dingle precipitated the most famous of his controversies when he objected to a statement made in a book the foreseeable furture regarding the famous twins paradox. The ensuing controversy was one of the most famous disputes in 20th century physics. The controversy caused Dingle to investigate the mathematical and physical foundations of the special theory of relativity and this caused him to doubt its validity. Eventually he discovered mathematical demonstrations which he interpreted as proof of flaws in or inconsistencies in the theory. The debate and discussion of these eventually led him to disown relativity as a valid scientific theory and his long campaign to establish his refutation of relativity as scientific valid remained his main goal for the rest of his life.


Notes

  1. Crawford, Frank S. (May 1957). "The 'Clock Paradox' of Relativity". Nature. 179 (4569): 1071–1072.
  2. http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath024/kmath024.htm
  3. Williams, Iwan (2003). McCartney, Mark and Whitaker, Andrew (ed.). Physicists of Ireland: Passion and Precision. IOP Publishing Ltd. pp. p. 252. ISBN 0750308664. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)

External links

Stub icon

This article about a physicist of the United Kingdom is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Template:Euro-astronomer-stub

Stub icon

This article about a British scientist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
Herbert Dingle Add topic