This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) at 00:20, 28 August 2007 (Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Matthead/Archive2007). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:20, 28 August 2007 by Shadowbot3 (talk | contribs) (Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Matthead/Archive2007)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Matthead's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
User talk:Matthead/Archive2006
Double town names in Gregor Mendel
Hello Matthead. Please see my invitation to User:Tulkolahten to find policy to justify single town names (the Czech forms) in the Mendel article. Your response to the same question would be most helpful, if you have looked into the policy issues at all. Before posting my own recommendation at Talk:Gregor Mendel I was hoping to find out if there were any clear statements of policy we could refer to. EdJohnston 19:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
South Tyrol again
hello there Matthead, you once voted and showed interest on the topic of South Tyrol. Certain Italian users just can't seem to give the topic a rest and had the article moved with a sham vote to the Italian name. I am calling for that vote to be annulled or at least extended so that more can vote and the result be representative. Drop by the talk page or drop me a message if you would like to share your thoughts, I am interested in hearing from you. sincerely Gryffindor 04:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)