This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) at 17:42, 31 August 2007 (→Quick comment: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:42, 31 August 2007 by RichardWeiss (talk | contribs) (→Quick comment: r)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)If you want to find some historical talk please go here and use Ctrl F but be warned its a huge archive page and may mess with your web browser.
This user is not an administrator on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify) |
Quick comment
Hey SB. No no no, I'm not here to complain about your edits. Well maybe a little bit, but that's not my main point. I'm just here to ask you to keep cool when arguing against MoritzB: he has been involved in a number of edit wars and I don't think raising the tone will do much good. He's already recruiting ammunition for these disputes and you can do more interesting things than falling into that trap. Best, Pascal.Tesson 03:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, SqueakBox 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Review
Well I was reading the[REDACTED] review topic and I waltzed on up to a person who can communicate for me. I can't register an account because I don't have the time or money to go and get a paid e-mail account. If I e-mailed a response to all readers could you post it for me? It is completely understandable if you couldn't, but I would really appreciate it. Not being able to tell your side of the story is incredibly frustrating. If you agree to, please send an e-mail response. Yours, Saturday 07:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/The Troubles opened
Hello. The above named arbitration case, in which you were named as a party, has opened. Please submit your evidence directly on the case page, or, if needed, submit it via email to an arbitrator or an arbitration clerk.
For the Arbitration clerk committee,
- Penwhale | 11:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
How?
How is nomming an article for deletion trolling? Bravedog 17:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- We cant be wasting our time with silly nominations of articles that clearly wont be deleted. Please dont waste other editors' time. Thanks, SqueakBox 17:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)