This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hal Cross (talk | contribs) at 05:17, 24 September 2007 (Constructive discussion please). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:17, 24 September 2007 by Hal Cross (talk | contribs) (Constructive discussion please)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)|
Christopher Mann McKay's Talk Page http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Christopher_Mann_McKay |
I will respond to your comment on my talk page, unless you request otherwise. |
AFA issues
Hello CMMK. Further to my prior message here about AFA issues, politics, and the homosexual agenda: I made a reply to you on the AFA talkpage specifically about your objections towards the sourced AFA issues material , and I made some suggestions. I have more information about pedophilia to add to that information so I would like some feedback on my talkpage discussion before I add it into the article. Hal Cross 13:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Send me an email - orpheus.wikipedia@gmail.com (that's not obfuscated, by the way). I've got a question for you. Orpheus 12:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Constructive discussion please
CMMK, you made these deletions of sourced views again on the AFA article: . They are sourced views which present published research showing the link between pedophilia and homosexuality, and how they relate to the homosexual agenda. You have removed similarly sourced views for the past weeks.
You have also just removed a large section from the article . That includes the views and explanations for why those particular elements have been boycotted. In doing so, you are suppressing the views of the AFA.
You also added this rather poorly sourced and unbalanced paragraph to the article .
I am being inclusive in my edits and comments on the talkpage so that we can make the article more comprehensive in information. You have as yet not presented any WP reasons or policy for removing the stated views of the AFA or AFA members. You have failed to give any satisfactory reasons for repeatedly removing views on homosexual agenda and pedophilia. You offered this rather unhelpful comment on the talkpage . Your reasoning is totally unsatisfactory. If you do not give satisfactory reasoning then the facts will quite legitimately be restored together with the reliable sources that support them. Hal Cross 05:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)