This is an old revision of this page, as edited by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) at 20:00, 4 September 2008 (→FYI: Response). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:00, 4 September 2008 by QuackGuru (talk | contribs) (→FYI: Response)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)FYI
User:Soyuz113 User talk:208.101.118.33 CorticoSpinal has returned. QuackGuru 18:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Noted. Thank you, QuackGuru. This information will be useful. Anthøny ✉ 19:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Why are you supporting a sockpuppet? QuackGuru 19:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am not supporting him; I am choosing to extend a second chance here. We'll see how it goes for him.
Anthøny ✉ 19:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am not supporting him; I am choosing to extend a second chance here. We'll see how it goes for him.
- FYI, I have contacted a top ranking admin by e-mail about the disruptive sockpuppets. QuackGuru 21:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean. My judgement with this is not acceptable? I'm very sorry if that's true. Anthøny ✉ 21:29, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- This is a rather shocking development, when an admin single-handedly ignores a three time community sanction and violates its trust by allowing abusive sockpuppetry, thus becoming a party to the crime. More. This is pretty serious and I will support any attempts to get this dealt with at the highest levels, including removal of admin tools and rights. -- Fyslee / talk 14:29, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- What can I say, but "that's simply preposterous," Fyslee. I'm not seeing any disruption from that account. It's not been confirmed as a sock puppet, and indeed there's no evidence been presented thus far to suggest that the account is owned by the user that it is.
- Going along with the suggestion that it was, I left a message that was angled towards a "you are Cortigo, I presume?", with no hinting of my intention to block. Tricky, I suppose, but also gaining his trust; if he truly wants to edit, perhaps I could offer the chance for him to do so.
- Then again, he hasn't edited since 2 September. This isn't a currently pending issue. That you are calling for desysoppings is frankly insulting, and I would suggest you retract that statement. There is no evidence at present (bar two editors' blank statements that he is a sock puppet -- I prefer to see solid evidence, regardless of the standing of the editors), and I am not going to take action on your instruction.
- Here is solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned to Misplaced Pages. It seems like he forgot to log in. QuackGuru 19:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am saying no more about the matter, pending Fyslee's response. Anthøny ✉ 19:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Frankly, it is irrelevant any kind of response by Fyslee. This is about a sockpuppet is editing on Misplaced Pages. If you are not interested in dealing with this matter you could of just explained that from the beginning. Again, I have provided solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned. Is the evidence satisfactory for you? Or, you are not interested in dealing with this matter anymore. QuackGuru 20:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I am saying no more about the matter, pending Fyslee's response. Anthøny ✉ 19:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Here is solid evidence CorticoSpinal has returned to Misplaced Pages. It seems like he forgot to log in. QuackGuru 19:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)