Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jerry (talk | contribs) at 23:00, 16 September 2008 (cls/keep (obviously)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. All high schools are inherently notable. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 23:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Bukit Bintang Girls' School

• Articles for deletion/Bukit Bintang Girls' School

Bukit Bintang Girls' School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A pool of copyvio, non-notable, POV, unreferenced, tacky and trivial information with no encyclopedic value. WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT. First primary school in Kuala Lumpur, no big deal. Not more notable than thousands of other first primary schools in thousands of other locations. Húsönd 03:25, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Evidently notable, this is a promising start to an article upon a respectable and historic educational establishment which deserves better than a contemptuous and uncivil no big deal. The article should be retained and improved in accordance with our editing policy. Colonel Warden (talk) 22:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Evidently odd definitions of "notable" and "uncivil". Húsönd 00:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - this is a high school, not a primary school, and was the first school in a city of 2 million. There are a number of additional sources available which, when added, will meet WP:N. The page needs a jolly good clean up but that is an editorial matter not grounds for deletion. TerriersFan (talk) 02:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —TerriersFan (talk) 02:11, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - Definitely needs extensive work, but appears to be notable given the amount of press regarding both the school's educational reputation and the demolishing of its historic campus; examples: International Herald Tribune, New Straits Times The Star (Malaysia) --Jh12 (talk) 03:38, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
• Keep - An important historic secondary school which easily satisfies WP;N. Plentiful sources are available for expansion and referencing. The article needs a lot of work but that is no reason for deletion. Dahliarose (talk) 11:12, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.