This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JNW (talk | contribs) at 03:44, 20 September 2008 (talk page deletion warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:44, 20 September 2008 by JNW (talk | contribs) (talk page deletion warning)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)August 2008
- An edit war occurs when individual editors or groups of editors repeatedly revert each other's edits to a page or subject area. Deliberate engagement in edit warring instead of discussion is considered a breach of Wikiquette and may cause a user to be blocked from editing. Attempts to win content disputes through brute force undermine the consensus-building process that underlies the ideal wiki collaborative spirit.
- Misplaced Pages works best when people with opposing opinions work together to find common ground. Our neutral point of view requires that all significant views can and should be documented proportionally. An edit war is the opposite of this, with two sides each fighting to make their version the only one. (Borrowed from Misplaced Pages:Edit war) ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 01:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Goingoveredge (talk) 18:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Goingoveredge (talk) 19:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
- If you continue to treat fellow good-faith editors as if they were trolls, then you will likely not be able to contribute here for much longer. Please engage people on the talk-pages and discuss the changes you would like to make. Find common ground and help create a better article and better resource for our next generations to enjoy. If you need some help, I would very much encourage you to review our article on dispute resolution. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 03:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
RFC contains your name
This is to inform you that an RFC has been filed that has your name here
Your Vandalism in Khalistan movement and Hinduism and Islam
Respected sir/Madam, thanks for your message in my talk page. It is amazing that an editor (You) who do not care for any Wiki rules and who do not care for normal ethics, who has deleted (1st deletion), (Second deletion) other editor's complaints from his own talk page to hide his acts from the greater Misplaced Pages community, who was even blocked by respected[REDACTED] administrator J.smith, is giving an advice to a humble wiki editor who is simply trying to protect wiki rules.
I did not add the text in question, and I did not add the teplate in question either. I repeatedly requested you to see an administrator before removing templates but you are acting in a extremely rude way. And, See I am simply trying to protect wiki rules.
Kindly participate in Discussion: "Distortion of this Article by User: Tripping Nambiar" on Talk:Khalistan Movement and please act nicely. Please refrain from this vandalism as well.--Beetle CT (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
RFC filed with you in subject
Since you are continually deleting my messages, involving in edit-warring without any constructive discussion, using[REDACTED] templates wrongly to delete information and pursue propaganda, an RFC has been filed with you in subject Here --Roadahead (talk) 21:27, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Goingoveredge (talk) 02:23, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk page conduct
Hi Goingoveredge, please don't remove posts you don't agree with on article talk pages. While some of the posts you have removed have been off-topic and unhelpful, at least some of the posts you've removed were valid. If you continue to remove valid posts to article talk pages, then you could be blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 23:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Editing concerns
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 00:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Muslim Students' Association has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. «JavierMC»|Talk 03:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JNW (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)