Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,
all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.
—Mizu onna sango15
I totally missed your RfA - would have chimed in and mentioned how indiscriminate you are in giving out barnstars...... Very belated congrats - hope you don't mind if I ask for help from time to time! All best Tvoz/talk00:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
You're talking about ancient history, but please feel free to contact me for anything I can help with. Regarding barnstars, I don't think I've given even three...but you were well-deserving. (I'm not really about barnstars, and I don't think you are either, even though you do have a few. I get the impression you're really more about the content, as I believe I am.) Anyway, thanks, and all the best to you! Frank | talk 01:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
You have that right. But I appreciated yours very much, for what you said. And you can count on hearing from me! Tvoz/talk02:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this RfA, considering this, this, this, and this (admins only), what do you think about me blue-linking this? I'm not asking for a full review, but your quick general thoughts would be appreciated. I've asked a number of opposers from the original RfA to comment here...basically, do you think it's time yet? Thanks! Frank | talk 08:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
First time 'round, I opposed because policy experience was just too weak for me to be comfortable. Enough effort has been made in that direction that I would now support with only a reminder to take it slowly at first. — Coren13:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Agree with those above. I opposed the first RFA due to lack of experience; she has improved since. I did find this, an incorrect db-nonsense tag that happened on November 24, but that's pretty minor. AFD contribution looks solid. Useight (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hmm. Still not quite sure with this one. I might have to abstain. However, depending on the strength of the nom, I might be convinced to support ;) —Ceran22:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I would probably Oppose again for the same reason as last time. I have high standards I suppose. I don't like the already slim Project space being almost exclusivley Wikiprojects and AfD. Just like how when I have waffles and syrup, I get the syrup in all the squares; not just two or three, unless I'm feeling silly and want to spell things or make a smily face. But I wouldn't make a smily face an admin.--Koji†00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)