Misplaced Pages

User talk:Frank

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KojiDude (talk | contribs) at 00:30, 9 December 2008 (Attention RfA regulars: that metaphor dragged on a bit longer than i had originally intended). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:30, 9 December 2008 by KojiDude (talk | contribs) (Attention RfA regulars: that metaphor dragged on a bit longer than i had originally intended)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
   User page        Talk page        Dashboard        Projects      

Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Thank you

Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna sango15
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed, all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. Mizu onna sango15
The Barnstar | My RFA | Design by L'Aquatique

The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar
Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,

all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced.
Mizu onna sango15


RE: Bored?

Yes, very :P Garden. 23:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you could cover the next week of my life for me. :-)  Frank  |  talk  00:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Meanwhile...

I totally missed your RfA - would have chimed in and mentioned how indiscriminate you are in giving out barnstars...... Very belated congrats - hope you don't mind if I ask for help from time to time! All best Tvoz/talk 00:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

You're talking about ancient history, but please feel free to contact me for anything I can help with. Regarding barnstars, I don't think I've given even three...but you were well-deserving. (I'm not really about barnstars, and I don't think you are either, even though you do have a few. I get the impression you're really more about the content, as I believe I am.) Anyway, thanks, and all the best to you!  Frank  |  talk  01:26, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
You have that right. But I appreciated yours very much, for what you said. And you can count on hearing from me! Tvoz/talk 02:38, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your careful consideration at my successful RfA. "clueful candidate" was generous and appreciated. Please let me know on my talk page if you have any suggestions for me. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 00:39, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Attention RfA regulars

Regarding this RfA, considering this, this, this, and this (admins only), what do you think about me blue-linking this? I'm not asking for a full review, but your quick general thoughts would be appreciated. I've asked a number of opposers from the original RfA to comment here...basically, do you think it's time yet? Thanks!  Frank  |  talk  08:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

I responded via e-mail. Ecoleetage (talk) 11:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I think the "Per Pedro" comments at RFA 1 would indicate where I sit on this.... Pedro :  Chat  12:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
First time 'round, I opposed because policy experience was just too weak for me to be comfortable. Enough effort has been made in that direction that I would now support with only a reminder to take it slowly at first. — Coren  13:31, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Agree with those above. I opposed the first RFA due to lack of experience; she has improved since. I did find this, an incorrect db-nonsense tag that happened on November 24, but that's pretty minor. AFD contribution looks solid. Useight (talk) 16:45, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Hmm. Still not quite sure with this one. I might have to abstain. However, depending on the strength of the nom, I might be convinced to support ;) —Ceran 22:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I would probably Oppose again for the same reason as last time. I have high standards I suppose. I don't like the already slim Project space being almost exclusivley Wikiprojects and AfD. Just like how when I have waffles and syrup, I get the syrup in all the squares; not just two or three, unless I'm feeling silly and want to spell things or make a smily face. But I wouldn't make a smily face an admin.--Koji 00:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Frank Add topic