Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ravichandar84 (talk | contribs) at 12:02, 12 February 2009 (→Barnstar of peace). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

San Roze
	My Wiki Home		My Talk Page		All My Contributions		Drop Me An Email

Archives

1Template:·w2Template:·w3Template:·w4Template:·w5Template:·w6Template:·w7

hi !

yep a bit busy .... studying & designing websites ( my parttime profession - http://nikitatelecom.ru/ , http://moscowtravels.ru/ etc .... ) ...... so howzz u ?? long time no see....--Doctor muthu's muthu 17:04, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Christianity in Tamil Nadu

is warranted Taprobanus (talk) 17:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

T. M. Nair

Hi! Expecting your views here-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 10:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

DMK

Done. Apologies for the typo. The "next update" page is not protected, BTW :) Gatoclass (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Genetics

Yeah, I'll have a look at the paper. But kindly pardon me. I don't wish to make any statement over it as genetics is not my cup of tea.-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 02:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Maraimalai Adigal

On January 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maraimalai Adigal, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for Tamil National Party

On January 28, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tamil National Party, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

GA Article

Need some help Can you take a look at this E. V. RamasamyOnly a few things need to be done.You are one of the best in this type of editing.The deadline has been extended for 5 days.The article was protected at one point for more than 9 months and it has come so far.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani

On January 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for Henry Alfred Krishnapillai

On January 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Alfred Krishnapillai, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for Henry Alfred Krishnapillai

On January 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henry Alfred Krishnapillai, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK for Johann Phillip Fabricius

On January 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johann Phillip Fabricius, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

RE: Periyar

Took care of it here. Thanks. Wiki Raja (talk) 22:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Thol. Thirumavalavan

Hoi. The article on Thol. Thirumavalavan had degenerated into something of a hatefest. I've taken a stab at fixing it, but Dravidian politics is really more up your alley than mine, so it'd be great if you could have a look at it as and when you have the time. -- Arvind (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Will look there in a bit. Cheers Wiki San Roze 13:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look. The article had seen drastic edits by one or more Sri Lankan editors, who'd turned it into a screed about his support for the LTTE. I thought that was way overblown (he's best known for his domestic politics, not for his views on the LTTE), so as you saw I tried to clean the article up a bit. My main concerns are as to whether I've accurately portrayed his views - I've read some of his columns in India Today, but I've not really been engaged with Tamil politics for the past couple of years, so I wasn't sure if my summary represents his current views - and whether the article still overly emphasises his support for the LTTE. How would you suggest we deal with the latter issue?

Incidentally, I know the VCK isn't a Dravidian party in that it isn't a descendant of the DK, but it's ideology is quite clearly derived from that of Periyar, so it is part of the Dravidian movement in a broader sense. I suppose it'd be most accurate to call them "Dravidian revivalist", in that they seek to return the Dravidian movement to its original ideals, which the descendants of the DK have abandoned. But that's just my view, of course. -- Arvind (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Stephen Neill

On February 1, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stephen Neill, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations!

Thank you for your hard work on Periyar E. V. Ramasamy. Following an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided, I have now passed this article as a Good article, and updated the various talk page templates to reflect this.

That also means you get one of these:

This user helped promote Periyar E. V. Ramasamy to good article status.

which you may like to place on your user page (or somewhere suitable) by copy/pasting {{User Good Article|Periyar E. V. Ramasamy}} into the page code.

Great job - well done! Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 12:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for the trust you placed in me by supporting my RfA (which passed and, apparently, I am now an admin!). I will do my best to continue to act in a way that is consistent with the policies of[REDACTED] as well with our common desire to build and perfect this repository of human knowledge; and can only hope that you never feel that your trust was misplaced. Thanks again! --Regent's Park (Rose Garden) 23:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Periyar E. V. Ramasamy

Congrats on the good job you've done on the article on Periyar! :-) However, I feel that there are some major issues with the article which need to be addressed. Please have a look at this and provide your comments and opinions. Thanks!-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 03:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Karl Graul

On February 4, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Karl Graul, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

DYK nomination of Henrique Henriques

Hello! Your submission of Henrique Henriques at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dravecky (talk) 12:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Henrique Henriques

On February 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Henrique Henriques, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Your Incomplete Action

Nice to know you alerted Admin who reads the mind. But you forgot to disclose that you are either a sock or meat putter of 'Ncm' BTW. Me and my friends who admire ದೊಡ್ಡವರು (respected the great Periyar) for his principles (though not recent misguided fanatic followers), like the[REDACTED] article. Looks like you have made some good contributions. 76.212.10.229 (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm a sock of Ncm? Whatever that would mean. As I said earlier, if you want me to help Naadapriya let me know and am glad to do so. But I always believe that anyone who chose to be ridiculous can stuff themselves with what ever they want. I would strongly advice you not to piss off people who are trying to be friendly with you. It wasn't my botheration to go and alert sysops for this, but yet I did. I would have expected you to be a bit more civilized to appreciate the fact that I had not been ad hominem and worked with good faith. Ta Wiki San Roze 07:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

The actions show if not Sock for sure a Meat Puppet of 'Ncm'. None of us are here to lobby to take back a good editor who was blocked by using the 'cracks' in the system (implicit conspiracy). If the system is allowed to continue as is it can happen to any good editor say you. We are confident that someone in Misplaced Pages will fix the system. Most Admins who sided the unjustified blocking are already in trouble with many other editors, even leading to recalls. We are not sure if the blocked good editor will be back or not, but we believe our efforts will prevent such an injustice happening to another good editor such as you. BTW: We believe in Periyar statement 'the caste system has perverted peoples ideas about human conduct' similar to believing Kanakadaasa's saying 'ಕುಲ ಕುಲ ಕುಲವೆಂದು ಹೊಡೆದಾಡದಿರಿ ...' (do not fight for your caste which has no meaning) .76.212.10.229 (talk) 07:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

You probably talking about Ncmvocalist. I do not think we have any common interests and you will be only one to think so. So lets make a deal. You and Naadapriya are going to apologise for throwing stones at me and then afterwards (and only afterwards) I will come up with my proposal that I told ShefeildSteel long ago so as to help Naadapriya. Until you get back your words you can just go about on your own. Ta Wiki San Roze 08:10, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages is not a platform to make deals among editors. It is on facts and issues. I wish you knew it. Arguments will continue based on objective evidence such as you sporadically endorsing a tag by 'Ncm' possibly in return to 'Ncm' sporadically supporting you on HK falls article who in turn got a sporadic support from Mspraveen in framing the ban. வணக்கம் for now. 76.212.10.229 (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

It is not deal among editors, but a deal to abide with certain conditions layed by the wiki community. Since your tone suggests me that you won't change for now. No Ncm or Ncmvocalist was on Hogenakkal falls article as far as I can recollect. You might want to check out the history yourself. You are theorising a wonderful story in your head. You probably want to get out of it and start facing realities. Once again, talk back only if you are ready to apologise for calling me a sock. You are not getting any help otherwise. Ciao Wiki San Roze 09:19, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar of peace

		The Barnstar of Peace
		For your work in peacefully resolving persistent issues and pointing out necessary fixes in Periyar article RavichandarMy coffee shop 04:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

No mention! It's a great compliment. However, I hope my barnstar does not keep you stuck to Wiki at the cost of neglecting your other work. If it encourages you thus in the wrong way, I'm sorry-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 11:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

By the way, have you completed your 25th DYK?-Ravichandar_{My coffee shop} 12:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)