Misplaced Pages

User talk:Wozwoz

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Binksternet (talk | contribs) at 16:12, 18 May 2009 (3RR warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:12, 18 May 2009 by Binksternet (talk | contribs) (3RR warning)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Super Audio CD

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Super Audio CD shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Note that reversions made by 58.173.10.128 are in the same pattern as reversions made by Wozwoz, and may be counted together. Binksternet (talk) 19:54, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't remove maintenance tags without fixing the problem that they indicate. You followed 58.173.10.128 and removed two {{Prose}} tags indicating that the list style of writing needed to be turned into prose style, or the list portions removed to make another article called List of . To repeat, don't remove maintenance tags that were placed in good faith, accompanied by talk page entries explaining the motivation and their usage. Binksternet (talk) 01:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User_talk:The_Red, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. User copied the 3RR warning from his own talk page by Binksternet and pasted into my talk page, impersonating Binksternet. This is a direct attack on the reputation of an editor and is unacceptable. The Red 03:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:David0811, you will be blocked for disruption. User copied the 3RR warning from his own talk page placed there by me, and pasted it into David0811's talk page, impersonating me. Binksternet (talk) 03:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 03:29, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. If you persist in this behaviour of using other editor's usernames as a cover for your own personal attack you will be blocked. Minorhistorian (talk) 03:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Minorhistorian (talk) 03:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

List of artists at SACD

You might want to weigh in with your viewpoint at Talk:Super_Audio_CD#Summary_lists_of_artists regarding your removal of prose tags. Binksternet (talk) 19:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Warning of violation of 3RR

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Super Audio CD shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 16:12, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Wozwoz Add topic