Misplaced Pages

Raw milk

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 77.103.93.207 (talk) at 00:10, 26 May 2009 (Nutrition). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 00:10, 26 May 2009 by 77.103.93.207 (talk) (Nutrition)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Raw milk is milk that has not been pasteurized or homogenized.

History

Humans consumed raw milk before factory farming methods coinciding with the industrial revolution, when large populations congregated into urban areas detached from the agricultural lifestyle to which they were accustomed. Up until that point, individuals and families owned their own goats, cows and other livestock and milked them on a daily basis.

Pasteurization was first used in the United States in the 1890s after the discovery of germ theory to control the hazards of highly contagious bacterial diseases including bovine tuberculosis and brucellosis that was thought to be easily transmitted to humans through the drinking of raw milk. Initially after the scientific discovery of bacteria, no product testing was available to determine if a farmer's milk was safe or infected, so all milk was treated as potentially contagious. After the first test was developed, some farmers actively worked to prevent their infected animals from being killed and removed from food production, or would falsify the test results so that their animals would appear to be free of infection.

When it was first used, pasteurization was thought to make raw milk from any source safer to consume. Although farm sanitation has greatly improved and effective testing has been developed for bovine tuberculosis and other diseases, pasteurization continues to be used as a stopgap measure in case infectious milk from a mismanaged farm should enter the food supply.

The Raw vs Pasteurized Debate

Main article: United States raw milk debate

Raw Mik Safety

The Raw vs Pasteurized Debate places the health benefits against the disease threat. Government Agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and numerous other worldwide regulatory agencies say that pathogens from raw milk make it unsafe to consume,. However, raw milk advocates like Weston A. Price Foundation in its "Real Milk" campaign claim that appropriate animal husbandry, and milk storage methods are sufficient to control the risk, particularly in the case of raw milk that is from a single, traceable source sold direct to the consumer. They also cite health benefits, including beneficial bacteria, enzymes and nutrients, that are destroyed by the pasteurization process.

The disease threat at present is a statistical issue and is defined in public health terms. Although Mycobacteria bovis (non-pulmonary tuberculosis) is found in raw milk, it is relatively rare in modern industrial societies. The public health issue is that tuberculosis and typhoid will always be present in raw milk, even if in statistically small amounts. These potentially disastrous pathogens in raw milk (non-pulmonary tuberculosis, typhoid, and salmonella) can be safely controlled by pasteurization, animal husbandry, and milk storage methods. The health of dairy animals can be managed by continual testing of dairy herds and careful storage of milk products. Some of the pathogens will never be eliminated from dairy herds since the pathogens are carried by common wildlife (goats, cats, dogs, pigs, buffalo, badgers, possums, deer, and bison). Thus, the public health side of the debate always returns to pasteurization, however, pasteurized milk still sickens people, and in far greater numbers than the more heavily regulated raw product

In 2008 scientists noticed that raw milk contains more bacteria than previously thought and identified Chryseobacterium oranimense as well as C. haifense and C. bovis, but the amount found in raw milk has not been proven harmful.

Lactose Intollerance

Lactose intolerance is the inability to metabolize lactose, a sugar found in milk and other dairy products, because the required enzyme lactase is absent in the intestinal system or its availability is lowered. Lactose intolerance is not the same as a milk allergy, says Kavita Dada, Pharm.D., a senior health promotion officer in the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Division of Drug Information. "For most people with lactase deficiency, it's a discomfort". Raw milk, unlike pasteurized milk, has its lactose-digesting lactase enzyme and Lactobacillus bacteria intact. However, America's Federal Food and Drugs Administration insists, that, "Drinking raw milk will still cause uncomfortable symptoms in people who are 'correctly diagnosed' as being lactose intolerant" .

Nutrition

Clean raw milk from pastured cows is a complete and properly balanced food and published accounts exist of people who lived exclusively on it. Indeed, all mammals, with the exception of bottle fed humans babies that aren't breast fed, are sustained solely by their mother's raw milk during their early, most crucial stages of development.

Allergies

Long-term and early-life exposure to stables and raw milk induces a strong protective effect against development of asthma, hay fever, atopic sensitization rashes and allergic hypersensitivity. In a study of 14,893 children aged 5-13, consumption of raw milk was the strongest factor in reducing the risk of asthma and allergy, whether children lived on a farm or not.

Legal status

Regulation of the commercial distribution of packaged raw milk varies across the world. Some countries have complete bans, but many have partial bans that do not restrict the purchase of raw milk bought directly from the farmer. Raw milk is sometimes distributed through a cow share program, wherein the consumer owns a share in the dairy animal or the herd, and can be considered to be consuming milk from their own animal. Raw Milk is sometimes marketed for animal or pet consumption, or for other uses such as soap making, in places where sales for human consumption are prohibited. Weston A. Price Foundation provide a worldwide directory of places to purchase raw milk.

USA

28 US states do not prohibit sales of raw milk. Most famously, in California, where it is estimated that over 100,000 people drink raw milk. Cow shares can be found, and raw milk purchased for animal consumption in many states where retail sales for human consumption is prohibited.

In Africa

Although milk consumption is fairly low compared to the rest of the world, in tribes where milk consumption is popular, such as the Maasai tribe, milk is typically consumed unpasteurized.

In Europe

A bottle of green-top milk

Milk is typically consumed unpasteurized in rural areas of Europe, and raw milk can typically be found in small amounts at stores in large cities. Raw milk cheese is legally produced in most European countries.

Distribution of raw milk is illegal in Scotland and The Irish Republic. It is legal in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and the Times of London reports that the Queen is still said to be a fan of raw milk from her Windsor Castle herd. About 200 producers sell raw, or "green top" milk direct to consumers, either at the farm, at a Farmers' market, or through a delivery service.

In Asia

In rural areas of Asia where milk consumption is popular, milk is typically unpasteurized. In large cities of Asia, raw milk, especially from water buffalo, is typical. In most countries of Asia, laws prohibiting raw milk are nonexistent or rarely enforced.

In Australia

Raw milk for drinking purposes is illegal in all states and territories, as is all raw cheese. This has been circumvented somewhat by selling Raw milk as 'bath milk'. An exception to the cheese rule has been made recently for two Roquefort cheeses. There is some indication of share owning cows, allowing the "owners" to consume the raw milk, but also evidence that the government is trying to close this loophole.

In Canada

The sale of raw milk directly to consumers is prohibited in Canada under the Food and Drug Regulations since 1991, but cow shares can be found.

Section B.08.002.2 (1)

no person shall sell the normal lacteal secretion obtained from the mammary gland of the cow, genus Bos, or of any other animal, or sell a dairy product made with any such secretion, unless the secretion or dairy product has been pasteurized by being held at a temperature and for a period that ensure the reduction of the alkaline phosphatase activity so as to meet the tolerances specified in official method MFO-3, Determination of Phosphatase Activity in Dairy Products, dated November 30, 1981.

However, like the United States, Canada permits the sale of raw milk cheeses that are aged for at least 61 days.

In Japan

Raw milk is not prohibited, but the production of milk is very expensive, and currently, omoiyari is the country's only wholesaler of raw milk for consumer consumption.

In the United States

Most states impose restrictions on raw milk suppliers due to concerns about safety. The FDA reports that, in 2002, consuming partially heated raw milk and raw milk products caused 200 Americans to become ill in some manner.

Many governmental officials hold to the need for pasteurization. B.P. (before pasteurization), many dairies, especially in cities, fed their cattle on—to put it bluntly—garbage, and their milk was rife with dangerous bacteria. Pasteurizing it was the only way to make it safely drinkable. After many years of pasteurization, just about everyone simply assumes that raw milk is dangerous stuff.

Proponents of raw milk (in the U.S.) advance two basic health arguments. The first (flatly denied by regulators and most nutritional scientists) is that pasteurization destroys or damages many of milk's most valuable nutrients. The second is that while it may kill dangerous bacteria, pasteurization also kills off all the good bacteria in raw milk—some of the same ones that big dairy companies are now selling as "probiotics" in pricey new yogurt and drink concoctions.

Supporters argue that raw milk is just as safe as the dairy it comes from. If the cows are healthy and the dairy is spotless, they say, raw milk is safer by far than pasteurized milk, because the beneficial bacteria naturally found in raw milk make it harder for harmful bacteria to grow. Accurate testing is also available now to detect the presence of harmful bacteria, something that was lacking when pasteurization was first propagated in the early 1900s.

See also

References

  1. An Impossible Undertaking: The Eradication of Bovine Tuberculosis in the United States, ALAN L. OLMSTEAD AND PAUL W. RHODE, The Journal of Economic History (2004), 64 : 734-772 Cambridge University Press, Copyright © 2004 The Economic History Association, doi:10.1017/S0022050704002955
  2. Not on My Farm!: Resistance to Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication in the United States, Alan L. Olmstead and Paul W. Rhode, January 2005, The Journal of Economic History (2007), 67 : 768-809 Cambridge University Press, Copyright © 2007 The Economic History Association, doi:10.1017/S0022050707000307
  3. "FDA and CDC Remind Consumers of the Dangers of Drinking Raw Milk".
  4. "Raw Milk and Raw Milk Products: Safety, Health, Economic, and Legal Issues".
  5. Elmer H. Marth, James L. Steele, Applied Dairy Microbiology
  6. "Tuberculosis in Animals".
  7. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1370/is_v20/ai_4119044/ FDA Consumer: Of microbes and milk; probing America's worst salmonella outbreak
  8. EurekAlert. New bacteria discovered in raw milk.
  9. "Problems Digesting Dairy Products? Raw Milk and Lactose Intolerance". Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
  10. Montalto M, Curigliano V, Santoro L; et al. (2006). "Management and treatment of lactose malabsorption". World J. Gastroenterol. 12 (2): 187–91. PMID 16482616. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. {{cite journal |author=He M, Yang Y, Bian L, Cui H |title=
  12. http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/34/2/185.pdf
  13. de Vrese, M. et al, 2001. Probiotics- compensation for lactase insufficiency. Am J Clin Nutr 73:421S-429s
  14. "Problems Digesting Dairy Products? Raw Milk and Lactose Intolerance". Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved 2009-05-20.
  15. Mattick, E., Golding, J., 1936. Relative value of raw and heated milk in nutrition. Lancet 2:703-6
  16. Fat and Blood, BiblioBazaar, LLC, 2007. Mitchell, S.W., (pp. 119-154)
  17. The Miracle of Milk- How to Use the Milk Diet Scientifically at Home, Read Books, 2008. McFadden, B.
  18. Lancet. 2001 Oct 6;358(9288):1129-33 "Exposure to farming in early life and development of asthma and allergy: a cross-sectional survey" http://www.californiarawmilk.org/site/_documents/news/Lancet2001Study.pdf
  19. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1374-81
  20. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2007 May; 35(5) 627-630 "Which aspects of the farming lifestyle explain the inverse association with childhood allergy?" http://www.californiarawmilk.org/site/_documents/news/JACIStudy2006.PDF
  21. www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1598525,00.html Time Magazine: Got Raw Milk? Be Very Quiet
  22. The Association of Unpasteurised Milk Producers and Consumers, Hardwick Estate Office, Whitchurch-on-Thames, Reading RG8 7RB
  23. "raw milk pathogens" (PDF).
  24. "Roquefort cheese can now be sold in Australia".
  25. "Statement from Health Canada About Drinking Raw Milk".
  26. http://www.realmilk.com/where-other.html#can
  27. Department of Justice (2007-12-02). "Democrats Seek Perjury Charge for Attorney General". Department of Justice.
  28. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/LDP/Aug05/ldpm13401/ldpm13401.pdf USDA: Dairy Policies in Japan
  29. Linda Bren. "Got Milk? Make Sure It's Pasteurized". US Food and Drug Administration.
  30. Ann Monroe. "Trafficking in Raw Milk". MSN Lifestyle.

External links

Categories:
Raw milk Add topic