This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Luis Dantas (talk | contribs) at 21:54, 29 May 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:54, 29 May 2009 by Luis Dantas (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Started in 2003 or 2006?
The current info contradicts itself. Luis Dantas (talk) 21:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
South Korea
As Agoust 10, Badoo is still unavailable from South Korean IP's. It looks like is having a php problem. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.98.120.147 (talk) 04:33, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Notability
This is now a site within the top 100 on Alexa and has featured in a report on Yahoo finance. I believe it now has sufficient notablity to be an article. Lumos3 13:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
A Rewrite?
The current entry totally looks like an advertisement, or typed up by someone at Badoo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.45.90.16 (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Dead link
The reference No. 4 is a dead link. The Yahoo article has expired. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.160.172.189 (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Badoo data mining!
I suspect the numbers on Badoo are pure hype! I apear to be a member even tho' I've never signed up or responded to any mail.... I'm sure it's pure cut and past info from numerous failed dating and networking sites! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.96.26 (talk) 04:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I totally agree. The data is highly questionable. I only found out about Badoo because of their annoying spam. This article is an obvious advertisement for them, so I've put a cleanup tag at the top, in line with the various criticisms on this talk page. Palefire (talk) 22:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)