Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Timmeh (talk | contribs) at 19:57, 1 June 2009 (→Block Notice: removing excessive amount of blank space). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Home	Talk	Contribs	Edit Count	eMail	Sandbox

Block Notice

I am currently blocked from editing. I opposed some admins, so they came at me with a ton of deletions and blocks. Don't ever make an admin mad, they will use their tools against policy to silence or get rid of you, just because they don't like you. Overall, I was successful in my goals. The 2 goals I set were - remove bad administrators, keep bad users from becoming administrators. At least 1 bad administrator was removed, and countless others kept from being promoted. --DougsTech (talk) 06:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

DougsTech (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree with the conditions listed here - .

Decline reason:

There is currently no solid consensus to release this block. Please wait until the discussion is concluded. Thanks for your patience. PeterSymonds (talk) 23:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your talk page

Hey. I have fully protected your talk page due to edit warring. If you want to post another request for unblock, please don't hesitate to contact me. I will forward it then. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 17:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't get it. It's his talk page, and others haven't got any business forcing it to be some way he doesn't want it. Why respond to others' inappropriate behavior by preventing DT from editing his own talk page? -GTBacchus 17:03, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

And, might I add, it's absurd for an admin to protect a page - and then continue to edit it, knowing only admins can do so - just like we're doing here. Unprotect the page please until Doug requests protection. If it's an edit war, we have other channels for that type of behavior. Law _{type! snype?} 17:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Question

Hey DT. Can you clarify for me your take on the events involved in this block? Do you think any of your edits were inappropriate? Also, I think you made a statement about your committments and intentions going forward as far as editing here if you were to be unblocked. Can you clarify those for me please? Thanks. Just trying to see where this all stands now that the storm has been given some time to calm. I hope you had a good weekend and are off to a happy and healthy start to June. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Great news!

My Request for Adminship, closed unsuccessfully at (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal! I figured passing this on would cheer you up during your block. While I never agreed with your position on administrators, I always felt your blanket opposition not disruptive (and would have felt left out if you hadn't opposed me). I look forward to your return. Cheers and happy editing.--kelapstick (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

It looked like your RFA would have passed had you not withdrawn, but I admire you withdrawing based on the issues by BuddngJournalist, and taking time to improve before another RFA. That kind of conduct is what makes a fine administrator. If other candidates had done the same when issues arose, we could have avoided bad admins. --DougsTech (talk) 19:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)