This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thryduulf (talk | contribs) at 10:42, 29 September 2009 (delete. deletion sorting). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:42, 29 September 2009 by Thryduulf (talk | contribs) (delete. deletion sorting)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Coolsmile
- Coolsmile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DELETE. Frankly, I feel that this is a speedy deletion candidate as no notability is asserted, but in any case it lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. This entire category really needs to go save for one or two articles. :-( JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete (A7) article does not assert notability. Failing that, delete per nom. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete - while it meets the spirit of WP:CSD#A7 in that it makes not assertions of importance or notability at all, the CSD criteria are meant to be interpreted strictly and they don't include products so I am not not comfortable speedy deleting it myself. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)