Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Saiga12 (talk | contribs) at 02:26, 17 February 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:26, 17 February 2010 by Saiga12 (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: viewedit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025




    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Battle for Height 776 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection - Authors/vandals are not objective rely on NOT reliable source.

    Ice dancing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Vandalism picking up speed in anticipation of Olympic event. Kolindigo (talk) 00:22, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

    Baby (Justin Bieber song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection - Constant vandals Candyo32 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    My World 2.0 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection - Over 90% of edits to page are of adding unsourced content that is stated not to add inside the edits; vandalism. Candyo32 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Justin Bieber discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection - Constant IP vandals. Candyo32 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Blah Blah Blah (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection - Edit war between established users and IP user that keeps changing the WP:LEAD out of standards according to WP:GA. Candyo32 (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    International University Vienna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, I don't see any constructive IP edits at all. Almost all edits within the last year were unresourced IP edits and reverts. →Alfie 23:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    List of countries and outlying territories by total area (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection, vandalism. Approximately 50% of edits to this article are either vandalism or users reverting vandalism. High level of IP vandalism. Bambuway (talk) 23:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Cassern S. Goto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, long term IP hopping vandalism. Falcon8765 (talk) 22:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Joseph Goebbels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, vandalism in the last few weeks, I can't seem to find a recent constructive IP edit. Connormah (talk | contribs) 22:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Veer (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection, vandalism; IP vandals remove references and add their opinions. This was a problem a few weeks ago and the page was protected. Copana2002 (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    User:Innotata (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Indefinite semi-protection, user namespace; I won't notice any vandalism here. —innotata (TalkContribs) 22:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Done Rjd0060 (talk) 22:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    2010 Haiti earthquake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, After the semi-protection expired, the vandals are coming back. --Pontificalibus (talk) 20:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 30 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    WWE Elimination Chamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Heavy vandalism from IPs, request at least 1 week (as vandalism for PPV articles tends to die down after the event). TJ Spyke 20:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Andrean High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP and new user vandalism. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz 21:22, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Arab Christians and Arabic-speaking Christians (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection, Persistent silly vandalism edits by fairly obvious socks using mobile phone IP addresses carrying on an edit war. nableezy - 19:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 19:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Coal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism. The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 21:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Reiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection Ideological IP vandalism - someone keeps deleting all the sections that contain scientific data or criticism of Reiki - Legalskeptic (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Bleiburg massacre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection IP vandalism and edit-warring, article is well known as "high-risk" due to the fact that it deals with a notably controversial subject. --DIREKTOR 18:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    This was an edit war between you and one single IP, who had not been warned of edit waring. I have taken it to the article's talk page so please discuss it there.--Pontificalibus (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Reggie Bush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection vandalism, resumed right after protection expired on Sunday. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 17:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  18:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Bone Thugs-n-Harmony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection vandalism, ongoing issue with IPs removing references, adding POV and original research, and messing up this article in general. Andrewlp1991 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  18:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Dillonjodovich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite create-protection, repeatedly re-created page on non-notable person, with speedy templates removed by creator each time. MuffledThud (talk) 16:12, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Creation protected GedUK  18:33, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Dominican Spanish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection, Sock disruption. Same as the Dominican Republic article with the same request. For list of socks, please Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/AFROdr. Elockid ·Contribs) 15:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  18:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Aspartame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This article was protected for one day. As soon as protection was removed, the vandals returned. Semi-protection would be useful. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  18:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Dhoom 3 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I would like to unprotect the page and recreate the article as I have sources that the Dhoom 3 movie will be made in 2010 or in 2011. Either year, the film has been confirmed NotoriousJet007 (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Quashie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I would like to unprotect the page to create it as a redirect to List of ethnic slurs#Q. Solarra (talk) 20:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Danielle Campbell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please unprotect the page. I have correct information. ~~HolaaGurlz

    Declined; article was salted due to multiple resurrection speedies in a short period of time. Create a draft in your userspace first, and make sure to source everything as you go. And please change your signature so that it links to your talk page. —Jeremy 19:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Daily Mail (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection vandalism, Persistent dynamic IP vandalism Christian1985 (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Already protected. Taelus (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    IPad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Just came off protection, ip vandals are back. Terrillja talk 17:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Flyguy649 17:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    The Marshall Mathers LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protection for more than two weeks. This page has been continually vandalized throughout it's history. In the past two weeks alone, the page has received no less than over 25 vandalist edits.--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 14:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sorry, but there isn't the protection history to jump straight to 2 weeks. GedUK  14:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    I understand, much appreciated though, Thanks!--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Dhanush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    longterm semi protection. This article is permanently plagued by IPs entering false or questionable information - in particular a date of birth vandalism, where various IPs keep editing random dates in the 80s that contradict the quoted source (IMDB). There is also tendencies of adding questionable personal information regarding his actors or his movies (lately unsourced POV hit/flop comments in the Notes column and describing him as Danush as playback singer). This is not a temporary peak in recent vandalism, but a persistent vandalism over a longer time frame. The birthday issue for instance is going on for over a year. The other problems vary but are somewhat regular as well.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:21, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    Sorry i got interrupted when posting my request, the article actually would need a longterm protection against IPs, since this not a current peak in vandalism but unfortunately a longterm problem of IPs adding questionable stuff on a regular basis.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    The page hadn't been protected since 2007. It would be highly unusual to start with a long protection period, it usually ramps up steadily. GedUK  14:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    Actually I requested a semi protection already a long time ago, at that time it was declined due to other additonal "good" editing by other IPs and since the problem was new at that time. However now it is a year later and we still have the same issue. The problem here is imho that this is relatively low profile article, where not many people keep a close watch and notice the constant and targeted vandalism over time. I'm just aware of it because I have it on my watch list. And the nature of this vandalism is of a form that short term protection won't fix anything at all. If you have IPs coming back for over a year to change the date of birth of introduce other questionablestuff, they certainly won't be discouraged by 3 day protection. This is not the kind of vandalism, where a new IP is messing up an article and is likely to move on when getting blocked for a while. This is going on for over a year, i.e. these IPs are obviously not discouraged by temporary blocks or reverts.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Divorce in Judaism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection due to vandalism - User:Avraham keeps blanking the page. (he's been around too long for semi-protection to work) Newman Luke (talk) 13:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting.Kralizec! (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    Declined Since I did not see where either of you have actually tried talking to each other, I would suggest that you start there. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Forbidden relationships in the Bible (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection - as above, User:Avraham has started blanking this one as well now. There is a process if he wants to propose deleting a page. Blanking it is just vandalism. Newman Luke (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Declined Since I did not see where either of you have actually tried talking to each other, I would suggest that you start there. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Shiddukhin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection - as above, User:Avraham has also started blanking this one as well now. There is a process if he wants to propose deleting a page. Blanking it is just vandalism. Please note spelling of page (there is a similarly named page on a related but distinct topic) Newman Luke (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Declined Since I did not see where either of you have actually tried talking to each other, I would suggest that you start there. — Kralizec! (talk) 14:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


    Zaid Hamid (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Please unprotected the page enabling to add citations from reliable sources and newspapers to make some sections more clear having necessary information. thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BewareOFkazaab (talkcontribs) 21:52, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

    Declined Please ask the protecting admin, CIreland (talk · contribs) first, or note on my talk page what the sources you are proposing to use are first; the level of vandalism on this article really was quite high. GedUK  08:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Brandon Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request for unprotection. Remove edit protect so that the page can be converted into a disambiguation page. At present four articles are likely candidates for the term Brandon Hall (Washington, Mississippi), Brandon Hall (McMaster University), Brandon Hall (MBTA station) and Brandon Hall School.--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Unprotected Please monitor the dab page for possible vandalism/hijacking, request reprotection here if the tomfoolery resurfaces. caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:05, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    I've added the page to my watchlist. Will keep an eye on it.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:26, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Medea Benjamin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotection - this has been indef semi'd for quite some time, from disruption of only 1 or 2 IPs, is indefinite really necessary? Connormah (talk | contribs) 00:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Unprotected caknuck ° needs to be running more often 05:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    The 404 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Unprotect, create redirect, and salt. The 404 is a popular colloquial reference to Highway 404 in Southern Ontario / Toronto. It's also the name of a popular podcast that doesn't meet the notability guidelines on[REDACTED] (hence the page currently being salted). I was wondering if it could be made into a redirect to Highway 404 (Ontario), but kept locked to prevent it from being changed back into an article about the podcast. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ¢ 00:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Done, sounds like a good idea to me. I've fully protected the redirect. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


    Template:Infobox organization (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    According to the talk page discussion there is consensus to restore the predecessor and successor fields of this template. It could be done by restoring this version of this template. The protecting admin was requested by this note, but he has a wikibreak. Most likely, there will be also other changes in the future but they still need a further discussion. Thank you. Beagel (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

    Done Ruslik_Zero 10:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


    User:Off2riorob (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Vandalism, there s no need for any ip to be able to edit my user page. Off2riorob (talk) 12:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected GedUK  13:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    Thanks Jed. Off2riorob (talk) 17:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Turkish Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Constant insertion of wrong interpreted or totally unsourced data. R.Schuster (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Kyustendil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection, regular IP vandalism by sockpuppets of indefinitely blocked user. TodorBozhinov 11:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  13:00, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    User talk:Pinar (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protection for a period of 1 month. High level of cross-wiki IP vandalism by a user indefinitely blocked on Turkish Misplaced Pages. Can be confirmed by contacting an active admin on that project. Pinar (talk) 11:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've protected for a week, hopefully that'll give them enough time to get bored and go away. Bring it back here if necessary. GedUK  12:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Syed Ahmad Al-Joofri (talk) 09:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GedUK  12:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
    Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection Add topic