This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tony1 (talk | contribs) at 11:14, 3 June 2010 (Possible new format, will now revert). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:14, 3 June 2010 by Tony1 (talk | contribs) (Possible new format, will now revert)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ArbitrationCommittee
Arbitration report
Contribute —
Share this
Report by Jéské Couriano & Ncmvocalist
The Arbitration Committee has neither opened nor closed any cases this week, leaving one case open.
Open cases
- Transcendental Meditation movement (Week 14): The case was opened to deal with circumstances surrounding articles related to the eponymous movement, similar to the circumstances at issue in Scientology pages a year ago. The case is being voted upon.
Other
- The Results of the May 2010 CheckUser and Oversight elections have been deemed unsatisfactory. Up to six Oversight positions and three Checkuser positions could not be filled, because only one candidate—Amalthea, a candidate for CheckUser—reached the 70% threshold. This was the first CheckUser/Oversight election to use the SecurePoll process. All eight Oversight candidates and four CheckUser candidates had been vetted by the committee and presented to the community for consideration.
- Amalthea has been granted CheckUser permissions, pending identification in accordance with WMF identification policy.
- The Arbitration Committee and the Community have begun a review of how CheckUser and Oversight permissions are granted.
Discuss this story
These comments are automatically transcluded from this article's talk page. To follow comments, add the page to your watchlist. If your comment has not appeared here, you can try purging the cache.- Does anyone have a link to the "review" mentioned in the last bullet point above?--Rockfang (talk) 23:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)