This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Snowded (talk | contribs) at 12:42, 18 October 2010 (→Basic formating: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:42, 18 October 2010 by Snowded (talk | contribs) (→Basic formating: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hi Justus Maximus! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Service
Do you have a link to Robert Service`s book please? mark nutley (talk) 15:58, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I haven't got a link to it. But I've read it a few times and there is no way Service is "unreliable". All these sources are being systematically suppressed by the same Marxist apologist brigade that suppressed the Marx quote from Radzinsky's book since 1996 and controls the whole Misplaced Pages project! Justus Maximus (talk) 14:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with you, but do yourself a favour Marxist apologist brigade will be called a personal attack. Some editors here game the system to get people topic banned from articles if they have the "Wrong" point of view. I`m sure you can see whom i`m on about. You need to remain entirely dispassionate at all times or they will be on you like fleas on a beggar mark nutley (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Communist terrorism
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Communist terrorism are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. TFD (talk) 14:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- And just to let you know, certain editors will use any reason possible to drop these stupid templates on your talk page and use them in future as "Proof" that they tried to sort things out. Next will be hatting of your comments (been tried once though i reverted it) as WP:SOAP so keep an eye out for that as well. The usual method of some editors is to rile people into making rash comments which will then be used as proof you WP:PA so you basicly need to ignore these templates mark nutley (talk) 14:45, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
I see. Thanks everybody. Justus Maximus (talk) 12:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
ANI
You are being discussed at ANI and may respond here. TFD (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Basic formating
I am getting really fed up of having to insert colons for you - READ and then APPLY WP:INDENT --Snowded 12:42, 18 October 2010 (UTC)