Misplaced Pages

2G spectrum case

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bluerasberry (talk | contribs) at 20:25, 4 December 2010 (Rajan Tata petitions over leak: more...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:25, 4 December 2010 by Bluerasberry (talk | contribs) (Rajan Tata petitions over leak: more...)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The 2G spectrum scam involved officials in the government of India illegally undercharging mobile telephony companies for frequency allocation licenses, which they would use to create 2G subscriptions for cell phones. The shortfall between the money collected and the money which the law mandated to be collected is 1,76,379 crore rupees or USD 39 billion. The issuing of licenses occurred in 2008, but the scam came to public notice when the Indian Income Tax Department was investigating political lobbyist Nira Radia.

The government's investigation and the government's reactions to the findings in the investigation were the subject of debate, as were the nature of the Indian media's reactions. The discussion around the reactions to the 2G spectrum scam became known in the media as the Nira Radia tapes controversy.

Parties involved

The selling of the licenses brought attention to three groups of entities - politicians who had the authority to sell licenses, corporations who were buying the licenses, and media professionals who mediated between the politicians and the corporations.

Politicians involved

Corporations involved

Media persons involved

Shortfall of money

A. Raja arranged the sale of the 2G spectrum licenses below their market value. Swan Telecom, a new company with few assets, bought a license for Rs. 1537 crore. Shortly thereafter, the board sold 45% of the company to to Etisalat for Rs. 4200 crore. Similarly, a company formerly invested in real estate and not telecom, the Unitech Group, purchased a license for Rs. 1661 crore and the company board soon after sold a 60% stake in their wireless division for Rs. 6200 crore to Telenor. The nature of the selling of the licenses was that licenses were to be sold at market value, and the fact that the licenses were quickly resold at a huge profit indicates that the selling agents issued the licenses below market value.

Nine companies purchased licenses and collectively they paid the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology's telecommunications division Rs. 10,772 crore. The amount of money expected for this licensing by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India was 1,76,700 crore.

Relationship between media and government

Main article: Nira Radia tapes controversy

Media sources such as OPEN and Outlook reported that Barkha Dutt and Vir Sanghvi knew that corporate lobbyist Nira Radia was influencing the decisions of A. Raja. The critics alleged that Dutt and Sanghvi knew about corruption between the government and the media industry, supported this corrupt activity, and suppressed news reporting the discovery of the corruption.

Rajan Tata petitions over leak

The tapes leaked to the public include conversations between Nira Radia and Ratan Tata. Tata petitioned the government to acknowledge his right to privacy and demanded accountability for the leak, with the Minister for Home Affairs, CBI, Indian Income Tax Department, the Department of Telecommunication, and the Department of Information Technology as respondents in the petition.

Response to scam

In early November 2010 Jayalalithaa accused the state chief minister M Karunanidhi of protecting A. Raja from corruption charges and called for A. Raja's resignation. By mid November A. Raja resigned.

In mid November the comptroller Vinod Rai issued show-cause notices to Unitech, S Tel, Loop Mobile, Datacom (Videocon), and Etisalat to respond to his assertion that all of the 85 licenses granted to these companies did not have the up-front capital required at the time of the application and were in other ways illegal. Some media sources have speculated that these companies will receive large fines but not have their licenses revoked, as they are currently providing some consumer service.

References

  1. Shalini Singh (28 Oct 2009). "BJP takes on Raja over telecom spectrum scam". The Times of India. The Times Group. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  2. ^ Shafi Rahman (6 Nov 2008). "Big scam in 2G spectrum allocation: CPI-M". India Today. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  3. ^ "What is 2G spectrum scam?". NDTV.com. NDTV. 16 Nov 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  4. "2G scam: 'Raja to blame for losing Rs 1.76L cr'". The Times of India. The Times Group. 10 Nov 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  5. ^ Amol Sharma (1 Dec 2010). "Wait a Minute, What Exactly Is Barkha Dutt Accused of?". IndiaRealTime. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  6. "Government orders probe into leaking of Niira Radia tapes". The Economic Times. 29 Nov 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  7. Sathyalaya Ramakrishnan (2 Nov 2010). "2G Spectrum Scam: Karunanidhi protecting union minister Raja for extraneous reasons- Jayalalithaa charges". Asian Tribune. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  8. "Telecom Minister A Raja resigns". The Indian Express. 14 Nov 2010. Retrieved 4 December 2010.
  9. ^ Joji Thomas Philip (18 Nov 2010). "2G scam: Govt to pull up five telcos". The Economic Times]]. The Times Group. {{cite web}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
Categories:
2G spectrum case Add topic