This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mike Cline (talk | contribs) at 15:52, 25 January 2011 (→Re your close the AfD for []). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:52, 25 January 2011 by Mike Cline (talk | contribs) (→Re your close the AfD for [])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Old discussions archived at User talk:Walton One/Old. Please leave new messages below.
Glad to see you back
Been a long break...hope you'll be here to stay for a while. bibliomaniac15 17:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back. Glad to see that your status has changed from undergrad to postgrad during your absence! Bencherlite 21:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, guys. And yes, I'll be around for a while, albeit sporadically. Walton 16:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Local government in New Zealand
Hi there, your stub article Local government in New Zealand had us stumped. Here's the relevant discussion. Turns out that it was truly missing and nobody had ever noticed. Thanks for filling in that gap! Schwede66 20:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. :-) Walton 20:48, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Re your close the AfD for Extra Mile Education Foundation
I was a bit surprised that you closed this as a no-consensus for the primary reason that the provision of the two non-trival sources by the last Keep essentially negated the nom's argument for deletion as well as the only other delete vote. Those sources clearly demonstrated notability beyond the more trival nature of the other sources. I cleaned up the article and added the sources, so I am confident it won't make it to AfD again, but again I must say I was surprised at the No Consensus close in light of the sources. --Mike Cline (talk) 15:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)