This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arzel (talk | contribs) at 03:14, 14 February 2011 (→Be Careful: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 03:14, 14 February 2011 by Arzel (talk | contribs) (→Be Careful: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
|
Friendly request
Please try to be less personalising and less condescending than here, especially when you are addressing the wrong person (an understandable error, but an error still). --Stephan Schulz (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- There was no error. I fully meant to address YOUR inappropriate comments on the GW talk page. I copied and pasted the name directly from the comment. You need to restrict your comments to the topic at hand, and not soapbox about unrelated matters that divert attention from the discussion. Thoams Yen (talk) 23:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, there was an error. It was not my comment you replied to. See the page history and my note there. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Be Careful
Or you will end up like the other tattered remains of others like yourself. These articles are very closely monitored by a core group of editors. Those that try to add some balance or research which would show different are either blocked as socks, banned for various other issues, or simply give up (like me) rather than deal with the headache. The requirements in getting anything past these editors is almost impossible to obtain. Meet one requirement and a new one pops up. A common one already applied here is citation count. Whatever that number is, no one knows, but you can be sure that this paper will never reach it. Arzel (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2011 (UTC)