This is an old revision of this page, as edited by F382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238 (talk | contribs) at 23:08, 25 March 2011 (→Barnstar: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:08, 25 March 2011 by F382d56d7a18630cf764a5b576ea1b4810467238 (talk | contribs) (→Barnstar: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Be prepared to watch this page or come for a visit later, because I will respond on this talk page. I will also watch your talk page for responses on my messages to you.
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
| This is Kslotte's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
Archiving help?
Hi! In case you don't remember, about a month ago you tried fiddling with my archive settings for MiszaBot since it doesn't increment the counter when it starts a new archive (for whatever reason). As of the latest rollover it's still not behaving. Any chance you have any other ideas up your sleeve that may fix it? VernoWhitney (talk) 18:50, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- My idea in the first place was that the bot didn't find the place to edit. But, reordering the paramters didn't fix it. A second alternative is that there is something in your header that disturbs the bot. But it seems odd, since the script is located first on the page. Sorry, but I don't have any good tip to get it fixed for you. --Kslotte (talk) 09:19, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I'll just try messing around with it myself some more then. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Military operations currently ongoing
Category:Military operations currently ongoing, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cs32en Talk to me 12:20, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Unarchiving
Could you please stop unarchiving talk pages? There's no valid reason to be doing so. Also, there's no reason to have old discussions sitting there for months with no comments, especially on pages which sometimes get bursts of activity which fill up the page to a great degree. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 18:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- I came here to say the same thing. I'm seeing you changing the bot archiving parameter to one year. This is almost never a good idea, and particularly not with BLPs. SlimVirgin 12:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- And, what is the hurry in moving the sections into archives if there is plenty of space left on page? With a frequent archiving some users may get the impression of discussion censorship. Allowing a longer time to elapse before archiving threads and keeping more threads on the talk page allow occasional visitors to the talk page the opportunity to respond. Anyway, feel free to revert me if you are familair with the "way of talking" on particular a page. --Kslotte (talk) 12:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- It's not a question of space. There's always space. It's a question of not leaving very old posts lying around. That's particularly important when it comes to living persons, but there's never any good reason to do it. It's best to allow active editors on the page to set the bot parameters, then allow the bot to archive. I'm not clear why you go around changing this so much. SlimVirgin 12:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Sean Connery
Thanks for the tidy-up. As you will have seen, this was my first attempt at auto archiving.I'm still not sure that the 'search' is working as it should. Could you please have a look? Best. RashersTierney (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- It usually takes a while before search starts to work properly. It probably use some type of content cache. --Kslotte (talk) 07:38, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- I was hoping it would be a delay issue; something like that. Thanks for clarifying. RashersTierney (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
pending changes on the nuclear powerplant article
They certainly don't make it clearer which edits were performed and which ones weren't; I have also experienced things not happening which I thought had done.... I wonder if it only filters out the bold edits ;-) L.tak (talk) 18:54, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
MiszaBot 1
Hi Kslotte, I have added MizaBot 1 to Talk:Swedish Judicial Authority v Julian Assange and he is not showing up, could you please have a look and let me know what I have wrong, seems correct to me.. Off2riorob (talk) 11:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- I replied at Talk:Swedish_Judicial_Authority_v_Julian_Assange#Archiving_old_discussions.3F. --Kslotte (talk) 12:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks amigo, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
2010 Copiapó mining accident
Hi, your recent edits working to help us transition to WP:SS are very welcome. I thought your initial edits were thoughtful and helpful and took the liberty of undoing your self-reversion. Please continue to be WP:BOLD and help us trim the fat and make the transition of the article to summary style. I look forward to more of your contributions. Sincerely, Veriss (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For taking care of Misplaced Pages, in the right way! :) WhiteWriter 23:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC) |