Misplaced Pages

Talk:Michael Danby

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DarrenRay (talk | contribs) at 08:28, 8 March 2006. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:28, 8 March 2006 by DarrenRay (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Talk:Michael Danby/archive1

Danby's preselection

  • Strictly speaking Danby will not be preselected until the Public Office Selection Cttee votes, which I think will be on Thursday night. But his 75% local vote assures his endorsement.
  • I cannot provide a published source for the preselection voting, since it has not been reported in the press (not as newsworthy as Hotham, obviously). I conducted the count and I can tell you that Danby polled 277 votes to van Leeuwen's 89, with 2 informal. You can take my word for it or not as you please. Adam 07:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

So it's OK to assert things without published sources? I'm struggling to keep up with the complexity of the rules here. DarrenRay 08:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Michael Danby Add topic