This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) at 01:45, 10 June 2011 (→File:NDENIS FOTO -1.jpg: dubious). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:45, 10 June 2011 by ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) (→File:NDENIS FOTO -1.jpg: dubious)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| < June 8 | June 10 > |
|---|
June 9
File:NDENIS FOTO -1.jpg
- File:NDENIS FOTO -1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Creator and author of photo is subject of photo, which is an impossibility unless he took this photo in the mirror. There has been OTRS correspondence concerning this photo. I request that it be accessed and verified, that it be deleted if the copyright status is not firmly established, and if retained that the actual creator and author of this photo be listed. ScottyBerg (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- I see no indication of who the photographer is in the ticket. Additionally, it discussed the other photos seen at Special:ListFiles/C.P.Taft. No way is Denis the creator of the movie poster File:NDENIS FOTO -4.jpg. All the images by this user should be deleted. I'm not really pleased with the ticket's handling. – Adrignola talk 18:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Good point. I forgot about those other images. Agree that all should be deleted. ScottyBerg (talk) 20:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- This is all very suspicious self-promotion material. I don't think we can trust this user for his copyrights assertions. --damiens.rf 21:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- DO NOT DELETE. A ticket was issued (#2010112710004281) pursuant to complete review of the copyright status of all the photos. The OTRS Adminstrator reviewed everything, and YES, the OTRS correspondence should be viewed.
That correspondence will show that all photos of Nelson Denis were taken with a remote shutter release. The correspondence also shows that Nelson Denis is the Writer, Director, and Executive Producer of the film (titled "Vote For Me!") and owns complete and undivided copyright to the film and the publicity photos, which he himself took.
There is no copyright issue here, an OTRS ticket was properly issued, and ad hominem commentary is not necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.200 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Rubbish. The two B&W photographs uploaded by "Taft" were taken some distance away in a crowded setting and were obviously not taken "with a remote shutter release." The movie poster does not list Denis as executive producer. There are several producers, none of them him, and an executive producer would not necessarily control the copyright of the poster or the production stills. Given the self-promotion at work here, I strongly doubt that Denis would have omitted giving himself executive producer credit, in either the article or the poster, if he was actually executive producer. ScottyBerg (talk) 01:42, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
File:WALDEMAR KAZANECKI FACE PICTURE.jpg
- sourced as "created by uploader", however metadata shows this is a scan of a non-sourced image; without the source it is not possible to determine actual (c) status Skier Dude (talk) 03:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:C cover.jpg
- File:C cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: there is no evidence the PD-Japan licence is valid because the source page has a clearly copyright notice at the bottom right of the page. ww2censor (talk) 03:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Eve no jikan cover.jpg
- File:Eve no jikan cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: there is no evidence the PD-Japan licence is valid because the source page given has a clearly copyright notice at the bottom right of the page though there is no direct link to the image itself. ww2censor (talk) 03:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:5..jpg
- File:5..jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Other uploads from this user have proven to be copyright violations. I suspect the only reason this one hasn't been similarly caught is the unclear filename and lack of description. Still suspicious, and extremely unlikely that uploader holds copyright. (ESkog) 06:38, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Note that a small thumbnail copy of this same image is used as a profile pic on the subject's own flickr page . This flickr account is also the source of at least one prior copyvio upload by this editor. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Alexander—Coat of arms of Sir Andrew Harclay, The Earl of Carlisle—2011.png
- File:Alexander—Coat of arms of Sir Andrew Harclay, The Earl of Carlisle—2011.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- http://heraldist.blogspot.com/2011/05/permission-licensing-agreement.html does not appear to be what we need and the img is not curial for the article. Mtking (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- The author of the images has given permission to use the images with basically a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial license. While this license is no longer a choice when uploading images, it certainly is enough to upload the images under fair use. Fair use does not require the author give any such permission whatsoever, mind you. And the image is good, no reason to not use it, especially if the author has given permission to use it on sites like Misplaced Pages. Dave Pritchard (talk) 17:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Reonkadena.JPG
- File:Reonkadena.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a video capture uploaded by an editor who has been warned about uploading non-free images before. Highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. --DAJF (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
File:James Durbin.jpg
- File:James Durbin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Looks like a publicity shot. No evidence it is the work of the uploader as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
