Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Did you know

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Qrsdogg (talk | contribs) at 06:32, 26 July 2011 (Arabic Mein Kampf: suggest alt). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 06:32, 26 July 2011 by Qrsdogg (talk | contribs) (Arabic Mein Kampf: suggest alt)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main PageT:DYK
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.

Purge

Instructions for nominators

Create a subpage for your new DYK suggestion and then list the page in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the bottom. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination (consider watchlisting your nomination page).

Official DYK criteria: DYK rules and additional guidelines
Unofficial guide: Learning DYK

How to list a new nomination

For a simplified version of these instructions, see User:Rjanag/Quick DYK 2.
For a step-by-step guide to filling out the
{{NewDYKnom}} template, see Template:NewDYKnomination/guide.
I. Create the nomination subpage.

In the box below, enter the name of the article you are nominating (replacing YOUR ARTICLE TITLE) and click the button to create your nomination page.


II. Write the nomination.

On that nomination page, fill out the relevant parts of the pre-loaded {{NewDYKnomination}} template. See Template:NewDYKnomination for further information about filling out the template.

  • Please be aware that you do not need to fill out every line of the template; only fill out the lines that are relevant to your nomination. (For instance, if you are not nominating an image to go with your hook, there is no need to enter anything in the |image= line or related lines.)
  • Please watchlist your nomination page or check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
III. Post at Template talk:Did you know.

After you have created the nomination page, list it at this page by finding the appropriate date and adding {{Template talk:Did you know/YOUR ARTICLE TITLE}} under that date.

  • The date to post your nomination under is the date when the article was created or the expansion of the article began, not necessarily today's date.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • You can also consider posting this same nomination to the article's talkpage, using the same code.

How to review a nomination

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Reviewing guide

Any editor who was not involved in writing/expanding or nominating an article may review it by checking to see that the article meets all the DYK criteria (long enough, new enough, no serious editorial or content issues) and the hook is cited. Editors may also alter the suggested hook to improve it, suggest new hooks, or even lend a hand and make edits to the article which the hook applies so that the hook is supported and accurate. For a more detailed discussion of the DYK rules and review process see the additional rules.

To post a comment or review on a DYK nomination, follow the steps outlined below:

  • Look through this page, Template talk:Did you know, to find a nomination you would like to comment on.
  • Click the "edit DYK link" at the top of the nomination. You will be taken to the DYK subpage.
  • Post your comment near the bottom of the page, leaving the line }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> below your comment. (If you are the first person to comment on the nomination, there will be a line :*<!--Make first comment here--> showing you where you can put the comment.)
<small>Created  by ] (]).  Self nom at 14:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)</small>
<!--
*{{DYKmake|Tyrannosaurus rex|Number1OfAllTheWorld}}
-->
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
  • Save the page.

If there is any problem or concern about a nomination, please consider notifying the nominator by placing {{subst:DYKproblem|Article|header=yes|sig=yes}} on the nominator's talk page.

Instructions for other editors

How to promote an accepted hook

  • In one window, open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to promote. In a separate window, open the prep area you intend to add the hook to.
  • Paste the accepted hook and the credit information (the {{DYKmake}} and {{DYKnom}} templates) into the prep area. Make sure to follow the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Did you know/Preparation areas.
  • In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage, replace |passed= with |passed=yes, and for the |month= and |year= fill in the month and year under which the nomination was posted (not the current date). Then save the page. This has two effects:
    • On the DYK nomination subpage, it wraps up the discussion in a blue archive box and states that the nomination was successful, as well as adding the nomination to a category for archival purposes.
    • On Template talk:Did you know, it replaces the full discussion with just a link to the discussion, indicating that the discussion is no longer active.

How to remove a rejected hook

  • Open the DYK nomination subpage of the hook you would like to remove. (It's best to wait several days after a reviewer has rejected the hook, just in case someone contests or the article undergoes a large change.)
  • In the window where the DYK nomination subpage is open, replace the line {{DYKsubpage with {{subst:DYKsubpage, replace |passed= with |passed=no, and for the |month= and |year= fill in the month and year under which the nomination was posted (not the current date). Then save the page. This has two effects:
    • On the DYK nomination subpage, it wraps up the discussion in a blue archive box and states that the nomination was unsuccessful, as well as including the nomination in a category for archival purposes.
    • On Template talk:Did you know, it replaces the full discussion with just a link to the discussion, indicating that the discussion is no longer active.

How to archive a day's nominations

  • Wait until all nominations for a given day have been resolved (either promoted or rejected) and at least 5 days have passed since that day. (E.g., if today's date is July 9, the sections for July 4 and later dates should not be archived, although earlier sections can if all their nominations have been resolved.)
  • Click the link to edit the section for that day.
  • Select the full text of that section (including all the templates, e.g. {{Template talk:Did you know/Some nomination}}.
  • Paste the text into a new page of the format Template talk:Did you know/Archive/YEAR MONTH DAY (e.g., Template talk:Did you know/Archive/2025 January 22.
  • Delete the text (including the header) from Template talk:Did you know.

Frequently asked questions

Backlogged?

This page is often backlogged. As long as your submission is still on the page, it will stay there until an editor reviews it. Since editors are encouraged to review the oldest submissions first (so that those hooks don't grow stale), it may take several days until your submission is reviewed. In the meantime, please consider reviewing another submission (not your own) to help reduce the backlog (see instructions above).

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Nominations

Billy Hathorn articles

I'm pulling a few articles by Billy Hathorn from the queue while they get checked for close paraphrasing, and putting them in this section. Gatoclass (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Older nominations

Articles created/expanded on July 8

Shinyo Maru Incident

SS Shinyo Maru

  • ... that the World War II commander of the Japanese tanker SS Shinyo Maru (pictured) told POWs held on his ship that he would order the guards to kill them if the Allies fired upon the ship?

Created by $1LENCE D00600D (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 12:27, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Comment: But murdering POWs was routine for the Japanese. What was their reaction to the Hiroshima bomb? Take the surviving POW, and kill him in the street. They probably didn't tie him up with barbed wire first, at least, so he got off lucky. Varlaam (talk) 21:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
The Japanese in World War II made the Nazis look like the Care Bears. Varlaam (talk)
The article is fine, inline sources check out, but I am concerned that the sources make it abundantly clear the Japanese commander (who is unidentified) did not tell the prisoners anything, nor under the conditions described is it likely he would. The survivors say the first thing they knew was when troops threw grenades on them moments before the torpedoes hit. They did not have any information, it would appear, about anything outside the hold where they were crammed together. The hook has to stick to the fact that the prisoners were massacred, and not suggest this unsupported movie-like scene of the commander addressing the prisoners. That is more than enough for a good DYK. So, I suggest,
  • ALT1: ... that 687 Allied prisoners of war on board the Japanese "hell ship" SS Shinyo Maru (pictured), were massacred by Japanese troops when it came under torpedo attack during WWII, with only 82 survivors. Alawa (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
it now has a merge tag. This should be reconciled asap. PumpkinSky talk 20:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Hook fact appears cited to an online and an offline source, but is not supported -- is even contradicted -- by the online source (as pointed out above by Alawa). Also, the two Eugene Mazza sources contain the same text, so only one or the other should be used. Finally, an awful lot of this seems to hang on Mazza's article, which, while it seems reliable, may not meet our standards for a reliable source. cmadler (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Brittany Pierce

  • ... that the writers of the television show Glee use cheerleader Brittany Pierce to say things none of the other characters would?

HorrorFan121 (talk) 01:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Is the following quote the support for the hook above? "I think they have a lot of fun doing it too, that's why they do it, because they think it's just so funny to have my character say the things that I say that nobody else would. They decided that this girl is going to be literally insane and she's going to say anything she wants to." If so I think you are bending the meaning a bit.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Performance psychology

Human mind

Created by WheelsDudley (talk). Self nom at 15:45, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

This has not been expanded 5x. Sorry. If you can then, will be reviewed again by me or another editor. Thanks. - AnakngAraw (talk) 01:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Author of article is trying to expand the article, but he/she placed it in the article's talk page. Author might need assistance because it seems he/she is a new Misplaced Pages contributor/editor. - AnakngAraw (talk) 02:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Tweaked hook by putting q-mark. Seems like 5x expanded. Original expander seems to be adding more to article. On my part, copyedited the article, the best I can given my availability. Need another editor to review and polish this article that is being expanded by a relatively new Wikipedian. - AnakngAraw (talk) 03:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Has potential. - AnakngAraw (talk) 03:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Please cite your hook in the article. - AnakngAraw (talk) 03:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
I am just wondering as to the status of my DYK - I have cited the sources as you have requested and would like to to know if I need to make additional changes or has it been approved. Also what happens with the information that other people had posted already on the page? It doesn't mix well with the what I have revised. Do I copy my information under their information? My instructor has a time scheudle that we are suppose to get this accomplished for a grade. Sorry for the rush. This is my first time with Misplaced Pages and I am not sure of the process (WheelsDudley (talk) 19:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC))
Still lacking in sources (a couple paragraphs are completely unsourced) and there are quite a few formatting issues, including how the references are written and a broken section header. Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. Is there anything else that I would need to do before it will be approved? (WheelsDudley (talk) 16:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC))
Referencing still needs work, and I am worried about the non-encyclopedic tone of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 10

Leal Garcia v. Texas

--BabbaQ (talk) 16:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I voted strong keep. And seeing how that AfD is going, I suggest you consider withdrawing it as it's a likely snowball keep at this point, so you'll save some administrator the time.

You are also wrong. Denying certiorari on the case, i.e. deciding not to hear it, would make it (at least as a Supreme Court case) non-notable for our purposes (as noted at the AfD as well as by myself above, the Supremes do exactly that many times each term). But when they call the lawyers in for oral argument, read their briefs (or, usually, have their clerks summarize said briefs and the case file) and then issue an opinion that some of them dissent from, it's a Supreme Court case whether they deny the petition or not. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

AfD has been closed, with no surprise as Keep.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
  • ALT 1,
Here is an alternative hook.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Well your one isnt any better actually but I dont care if we publish alt 1 or 2.. so that is up to the publishing user. But that is OK--BabbaQ (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Expedition of Usama bin Zayd

Created by User:Misconceptions2 (talk). Self nom at 00:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

I am not sure if it is suitable to call the "Expedition of Usama bin Zayd", the "Invasion of Palestine", like this invasion of Palestine. But still linking to the Expedition of Usama bin Zayd? Any suggestions?--Misconceptions2 (talk) 00:20, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Tagged as possibly being POV. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:01, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
The article currently has a POV tag ("10 Rules of Abu Bakr" section marked as undue weight). User:Al-Andalusi has also added {{Hadith authenticity}} three times, with article creator Misconceptions2 immediately removing it each time. This article is not in a suitable state for the Main Page. cmadler (talk) 17:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 11

Burrough Hill

5x expanded by Nev1 (talk). Self nom at 15:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The length is fine, as is the hook (although I see no point in not linking macula, since readers will want to know what it means). The problem comes with the date. The bulk of the expansion was done more than five days before listing here. It is, appropriately, listed under July 11, but was added here on July 18. By my reading of the rules, that would make it too late to qualify. I would welcome a second opinion on this, and will gladly pass the article if I'm being too strict on this point. It's certainly of high enough quality, but it doesn't seem to be recent enough. --Stemonitis (talk) 08:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment: DYK is for recently created or (substantially) expanded articles. The rules are that they are to be submitted within 5 days. There is some wiggle room, but it for exceptions, such as if there are so few nominations, that DYK is hard up for articles, or the topic is very important and warrants inclusion on the main page, or perhaps where someone is very new, worked very hard and submitted a day or two late. There has been a lot of abuse of the flexibility, which has the result of nullifying the 5-day rule. Either the rule is 5 days or it isn't. If it isn't, if it's 8 or more, the whole concept of DYK starts to come into question. In this case, the nominator has almost double the number of DYK articles that I have, not to mention way more experience with WP, so I'm inclined to say that this should be nixed on the lateness of the nom. Marrante (talk) 10:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Claymont Court

5x expanded by ArchonMeld (talk). Self nom at 15:49, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Bob Hensgens

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 15:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT:... that Louisiana State Rep. Bob Hensgens once paid part of the filing fee for his opponent?
Reviewed Anna Eliot Ticknor

A number of problems here.

  1. Sourcing is poor. What is JMC Enterprises ("Win with JMC") and why are they a reliable source? What is "Tea Party Cheer" and how do we know that they are accurately reprinting the Tea Party of Louisiana press release? Can you find a better source than an unauthenticated personal Facebook page which supposedly belongs to the subject? "Louisiana Secretary of State, Legislative Special Election, April 30, 2011" is not a citation that allows readers to find this information.
  2. Article needs cleanup to keep it focused. Irrelevant information (such as "In 1964, the first two Republicans since Reconstruction took their seats in the lower chamber of the Louisiana Legislature, having represented Caddo Parish in far northwestern Louisiana. The GOP now has a majority of the seats in the chamber" and the end of Dupuis's term) need to be removed and lengthy quotes cut down.

This article could well be suitable for DYK, but these problems must be addressed first. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 18:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Also, we need a better source for the statement in the hook that Hensgens cut his pay to give police officers a pay raise - a press release from the Tea Party won't do, we need a newspaper or perhaps a government document. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 18:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Corrections made. Billy Hathorn (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Some but not all. You're still citing the TP of Louisiana's endorsement to TeaPartyCheer when it would be better to cite either to a news source or to the TP's own website, and we still don't know if WinWithJMC is a reliable source (bring it to WP:RSN, please), but I guess I could still approve it with those being the case; however, you're still missing a reliable source for the hook fact re: police (and for the bit about balancing the budget). LouisianaConservative is obviously an agenda blog rather than a news source and TheDeadPelican source is just a press release. Also, the manifesto ("pro-life pro-gun" whatever) is not in the cited source. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 16:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 12

Messiah Part II

The last page of the Hallelujah chorus, ending Part II, in Handel's manuscript

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 20:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

DYKCheck does not show a 5x expansion, and the date of creation is on July 5, after the 5 day limit. Referencing in a few sections, such as the second paragraph in the overview, needs work. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I would accept but. I wish the reviewing history for Part III and Part I was still here, which both appeared yesterday. I will look for it but don't have time now. So for the moment just compare the articles. The Overview section is the same for all three, therefore should not be counted for the expansion, DYK check doesn't know that, smile. I couldn't manage to expand them all three one day, smiling more. I will work on the refs a bit more, but again, not now, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I improved the referencing and added further, not for DYK but to make an important article as good as I can. Reviewing history of Part I (moved by you) and, more interesting, Part III. Please note that a reference to the Wikisource should be even better than an inline citation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • In general you are right. In this specific case: Wikisource has the location of a bible text, and clicking on the position you get this very text and can verify that these are indeed the words used in the composition, which you can compare to the the scores. I call that reliable, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Impressive. Good luck with improving the article. However, the time between the creation and nomination of the article still precludes me from passing to the nom. Sorry. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Article history: this article had 3215 chars readable prose on 12 July. But: that was not "this article", just an overview, common with Part I and Part III. All new is the expansion done since, now 15582 chars, so new 123xx chars. If not you, perhaps someone else can see that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I can verify 5x expansion can now be shown, with expansion starting on the 12th. I still have qualms with the referencing, so I will defer the final decision to another editor. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

It is not clear to me what exactly the problem with sourcing is. Wikisource, as far as I can see, is not actually cited as a source, it is merely linked to. Ucucha 13:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

The Part II movements section has some parts which are entirely unreferenced. If I am not mistaken, it is generally expected that a DYK article has at least one citation per paragraph except for plot summaries. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Isn't that section essentially equivalent to a plot summary? Ucucha 14:00, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I would not be sure. As far as I remember, a movement is like a part of an orchestral work which has a similar rhythm and theme. I am not an expert on classical music. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I am back. Quote from the review of part III (linked above): "I agree that a few more things should be cited (or the Overview could be shrunk). But WP:NOR should not apply to a simple description of facts obvious to a music-reader, any more than it is OR to name the colors in a painting or describe the slope of a graph. We should be able to extrapolate from the exceptions made in WP:NOR for Misplaced Pages:Nor#Translations_and_transcriptions and routine calculations. Sharktopus 01:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)" Added to this quote: On purpose every movement has its own heading, to be able to link to it from other articles by movement#, one such link is Hallelujah chorus. Every movement (level4) could have its own bible quotation from Wikisource (see the table at Messiah structure#Part II), but if it is the same for several in a row I put it to the "scene" (level3), feeling that it's holding up the prose. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
That makes a bit of sense, although I still feel unclear on this issue. As such, I leave it to another editor to approve/disapprove the hook. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I ask Classical music to verify the article. Members of the project checked already Parts I and III. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
In response, Graham87 checked the article. I also left a note on the project page and a personal one with Michael Bednarek, who worked on the Christmas Oratorio, among others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree with the above quote by Sharktopus. Statements of instrumentation, quotations from the libretto, etc. need not be cited, as they are sourced to the score in the same way that the plot summary for a book or movie is considered sourced to the book or movie itself. Interpretations do need to be cited, and it generally appears to me that they are. (I have not, however, confirmed that sources actually support the statements they are used to cite, nor that the sources cited are reliable.) cmadler (talk) 14:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I guess I'll AGF this, as it doesn't seem that WikiProject Classical Music didn't see any problems. As noted above, length and whatnot check out. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Ostrzanin Uprising

5x expanded by Ajh1492 (talk). Self nom at 18:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Article was expanded from a redirect, but it must still meet the 1500 prose character minimum. It currently has only 1242. See WP:DYKcheck for a prose counting tool. I have not checked anything else about the article. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 00:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I have added additional material that brings it well over 1500 prose characters. Ajh1492 (talk) 20:53, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Article is now long enough, but the article needs a thorough copyedit. There are numerous punctuation errors, and there are non-English words used without any explanation of their meaning. These words need to either be translated or be glossed with an explanation. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I did a copy edit of the article, linked some of the terms and asked for help with the translation of the quote (I can only translate about 2/3 of it). However, the article still needs inline citations.Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Any chance of an Alt tagline? The one above is very wordy. Panyd 15:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Superman: Deadly Legacy, Superman and Wonder Woman - the Hidden Killer, Batman: Death of Innocents

Created/expanded by AnakngAraw (talk). Self nom at 00:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Bolding the third article (Batman: Death of Innocents), which I have expanded further based on available refs. So this is now a triple nomination, instead of just a double-nom. Thanks. - AnakngAraw (talk) 00:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Dougie (dance)

Created by LittleT889 (talk). Self nom at 23:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Is it possible to rewrite the "In popular culture" section? Currently, it's not even in chronological order. Nor does it explain who Glen "Big Baby" Davis and Nate Robinson are, without clicking the links to read more. John Wall, Braylon Edwards, Bruno Mars, Wolf Blitzer, and Michelle Obama are probably the only occurences that are truly notable. The circumstances of the other performances of this dance are trivial at best, and could be summed up by saying that the move is widespread in the sports world, as is the theme of the article you're sourcing. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Also, is it best classified a hip-hop dance? There's no genre listed in the intro. I've added an image I found on Flickr, the only free licensed work that appears when I search CC content for "dougie dance". Is this indeed representative? -- Zanimum (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Much as there might be scope to improve the article, it meets all DYK critera. Hook verified by sources and article created on the 12th at 1700~ characters. Good to go! Panyd 16:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Gordon Dove (Louisiana politician)

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 18:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

  • date and size ok, I wish we could tweak the hook a bit. As it reads it is ambiguous as it doesn't say what he proposes for the islands he is targeting... Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:28, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • PS - need to reword a bit to distance wording from source. I can't think of a way to equate "careen" with something else, nor "north-south corridor", "raise awareness of the importance" should be doable Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Reviewed: Wicklow Way

Anal people

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 11:08, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: Jacques Seligmann & Company (diff) Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Oh please, please, save this for April Fools. Is there any chance that we can get this to fixed up to featured status? -- Zanimum (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Not for this year, but there is a bit more information in the sources that I did not use (funeral customs and whatnot). Non-Indian sources on the Anal are hard to find. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:30, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Agreed, now that I've had a chance to look at things. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:51, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think it's appropriate for Misplaced Pages to make juvenile puns on the name of a people. Ucucha 13:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
    • For April Fools, we have had stuff like Batman (a province) being half female and whatnot. Most of the April Fools hooks play on puns. With the proper capitalization (i.e. the original hook), we could make a sound argument that we did not mean anything related to the anus. (Side note: anybody want to expand Anus language?) Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
      • Past errors are no excuse to repeat them, and I think puns on "anal" are more offensive than those on "Batman" (which seem mainly silly). The name of a people is a major part of that people's heritage, and joking about it on the front page of what should be a serious encyclopedia is inappropriate. Ucucha 00:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Well, almost any hook we write will wind up being read as a pun. For example:
ALT2: ... that Anal people wear a basket around their waist every day?
ALT3: ... that the Anal have their own language?
ALT4: ... that the Anal refer to themselves as the Pakan?
ALT5: ... that Anal people may have to pay a fine when divorcing?
ALT6: ... that the Anal are not vegetarians?
That's just the way the human mind works, methinks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm in agreement that it's a bit offensive, but also in agreement that this would be perfect to save for April Fools. --Elonka 02:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 13

Bystry Canal

Created by Ajh1492 (talk). Self nom at 22:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Is there anything more... hooky? Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
There are several paragraphs without any refs. --PFHLai (talk) 20:01, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Crisco caught this problem, I'm just adding the icon. Hooks along the lines of "... that this canal is a canal" should not be featured. Hooks need to express something interesting, not just give a simple definition or a bunch of uninteresting details. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Sarah Dixon (sternwheeler)

  • ... that after the Sarah Dixon steamboat launched in 1892, it was involved in collisions in 1894 and 1898, reconstructed in 1906, immobilized in freezing water in 1909, and suffered an explosion in 1912?
  • ALT1:... that although a court found Sarah Dixon not guilty of drowning a man in 1898, nine people fled four miles from her in 1912 to seek help after three of their colleagues were killed?
  • Comment: ALT1 is only meant to be used if reviewers think this should be saved for the April Fool's Day DYK.

Created by Mtsmallwood (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 06:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Nice article - references, length etc are fine. Regarding ALT1, I agree that it would make a good April Fool's piece, but that is rather a long time away! Are you sure that you would want to wait that long for it to appear? Prioryman (talk) 07:19, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Prehistoric Lepidoptera

1887 engraving of Prodryas persephone, a fossil Lepidopteran from the Eocene.

Created by Ruigeroeland (talk), Obsidian Soul (talk), Kevmin (talk). Nominated by AshLin (talk) at 03:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Reviewed : General Johnson saving a Wounded French Officer from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian
Length looks good, as does the date. Online sources check out. However, could you fix the somewhat bare URLs? Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Links appear to have been fixed. I say ready for takeoff (though preferably with the first hook). Panyd 16:07, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
I'll say. Good work. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

General Johnson Saving a Wounded French Officer from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian

eneral Johnson saving a Wounded French Officer from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian

Created by Fanfwah (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 21:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Part of the Multi-lingual Wright challenge, written in French first. Our editors are here Victuallers (talk) 21:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
great, but I am afraid the main hook is too dull and does need a more interesting alternative. Materialscientist (talk) 13:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
ALT1 ... that General Johnson Saving a Wounded French Officer from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian provides one of only two known contemporary pictures of the British Light Infantrymen?
Like this? Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Very interesting, but can we have a reliable reference for this strong fact. I'm not sure ref. 6 is such a ref. and that it really means any British Light Infantrymen - I think it means only those who fought in New York (?). Whatever the hook, please rectify this in the article. Materialscientist (talk) 03:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Hmm... I don't know if it is strong enough either. Not sure about the site, either. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
The source seems to mean "British Light Infantrymen for the French and Indian War period" and I have rectified the French and English articles accordingly. I think the source is rather reliable, although not academic, because finding contempory images is a true concern for reenactors. But I agree it does not make a very strong hook. Fanfwah (talk) 22:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Landguard Manor

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 04:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Rosie has nommed this above with another articles♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • What does the hook mean? The article could do with some tidying: the history of the site is confused and the adaptation from Pevsner awkward and contradictory. I wouldn't be sure the portrait by Thomas Lawrence is still in the drawing room unless you have a recent ref (the current cite for that fact is from 1888); likewise with the flora - a lot of species can disappear in a hundred years - and are you sure about Merrett? I've never heard of it and can't find any references to a Merrett plant, though it might have been a local name for a plant listed by Christopher Merret. Yomangani 12:16, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

George McGavin

Created by Pigsonthewing (talk). Self nom at 12:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hook fact needs a ref in the article; other than that we're good to go.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:27, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Fixed, sorry. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
I would appreciate another editor opining here, as the ref -- to the subject's own site, but I think that is OK for these purposes -- is a little unclear as to whether it means what the hook says. The quote in the subject site is "As well as studying insects George also eats them and has appeared on the Richard and Judy Show as the guest chef." While that may well imply that he ate the insects on the show, it wasn't completely clear to me ... hence my request for another editor's view. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:53, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
While I don't see that as an issue, I'm happy to reword the hook if it's a blocker? Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:59, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Horny House of Horror

Created by Andrzejbanas (talk). Self nom at 03:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Hook fact needs a citation directly after it; other than that we're good to go. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
    • Also, nominator needs to review one. It seems s/he already has 5 DYKs. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:33, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
      • Hi! I think I've completed the above. Is it good now? Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
        • Not yet; you should review another article. (I saw on your Talk Page that you have 5 or 6 DYK self-noms already). Near the top of the page there are many articles needing a review, which just need to be checked for length (1500 chars or more), completeness (no obviously missing things, like empty section), well-cited (minimum one cite per paragraph except lead and plot sections), hook fact cited directly (like you had to do), and if possible that the hook fact is in the source. Also, if you see anything really, really out of place (like a huge copy and paste quote) you should bring it up. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:55, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
        • Why is it at all notable or interesting for DYK that a porn actress was cast in a porn film? To go on the main page, the hook needs to be more interesting/notable, no? NickDupree (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Not yet, nominator needs to review something. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:34, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Kabardino-Balkar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic

5x expanded by Σ (talk). Self nom at 02:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Fakfak

5x expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 01:28, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

If anyone has a good hook that plays on Fak <--> Fuck feel free to add it Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
How about ALT2 ... that Fakfak is now fighting against AIDS and depopulation? morelMW 11:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Heh, I like the original hook, although it's not cited in the article. cmadler (talk) 17:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Hook fact for original now cited directly (at the end of the sentence) Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 14

Navlab

Created by Chaosdruid (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 10:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Al ash-Sheikh

  • ... that a power-sharing pact dating to 1744 has the Saudi royal family supporting the religious authority of the Al ash-Sheikh family, who in turn would support the political power of the House of Saud?

Created by DeCausa (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 05:36, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Date, length & citation verified. However, the hook exceeds 150 characters. Suggest:

- Fayenatic (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Tortrix destructus, Tortrix florissantana

Created by Kevmin (talk). Nominated by Smokeybjb (talk) at 16:46, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

  • It's good that you're documenting some extremely poorly known species like these, but I have some concerns. Why aren't the question marks in the article titles, if that is what they were named? Also, what is "revisions to the Eocene-Miocene boundary" supposed to mean? And where does the 35 million years figure comes from? In Engel (2003), I only see that the Florissant Formation is Eocene-Oligocene in age—not that it is exactly 35 mya. Perhaps they are Priabonian, but you need a source that actually says that. (Even when you do have such a source, the hook is rather bland. All fossils have been found somewhere and have some age, and there is nothing here that tells the reader why these particular species are special.) Ucucha 03:18, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
..(alt) ..}}... that there is no evidence that the moth species Tortrix destructus or the larger Tortrix florissantana have flown in the last 30 million years?
Twist the hook and remove question marks to try and help with a catchier? hook Victuallers (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Du Toit and Another v Minister of Welfare and Population Development and Others

Created by Htonl (talk). Self nom at 00:28, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: this is my first DYK nom, which is why I have not reviewed another nom. - htonl (talk) 00:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook


Article

Comments/discussion:

Cronaca Fiorentina, Baldassarre Bonaiuti

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self nom at 18:24, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Ref for ALT1 hook in article: excerpt from The Florentine Chronicle (c.1370-1380) "I'm going for the doctor."

Donde Quiera Que Estes

  • ... that EMI Latin and SBK Records had wanted their artists to collaborate in a song to help boost each others fan base in different regions in the United States?

5x expanded by AJona1992. Self nom at 07:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Date and hook ok, offline ref accepted in good faith. Part of me thinks the song title should be in the hook in full rather than like the Easter egg it is now but I won't hold up the nom for it. You should also shorten the lead for this article, it's too long. — Hunter Kahn 14:41, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Note I don't know any other way to do an alternative. However, how about just saying the songs title instead of "in a song"? The reason why its big is because I wanted to follow WP:Lead and had several editors who had reviewed my articles that I wasn't following the rules on the lead. Thanks, AJona1992 (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Techno Cumbia

  • ... that Techno Cumbia was believed to be the earliest forms of pop-cumbia-rap fusions?

5x expanded by AJona1992. Self nom at 07:42, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

per above and talk on user talk page.PumpkinSky talk 23:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
  • The hook is badly formatted, and does not make sense. "Techno Cumbia" is the name of a song, not of a style of music. It is also extremely vague and uses weasl words; who believed this, and why is their opinion worthy of note? --EncycloPetey (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
According to Billboard magazine it is. AJona1992 (talk) 17:48, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I've checked the cited source for this claim, but do not find it supported in the source. If I'm wrong, then please point out the quote from Billboard that supports the hook's claim. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:22, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes it is there, seems to me that you didn't read it (fully) at all. Please read Selena's spot on the article which is right next to Ricky Martin's ad for his album. Located near the bottom of the article. AJona1992 (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
In fact, I did read that bit, but it does not support the hook's claim. It says that "During her heydey, Selena established one of the early templates for pop-cumbia-rap fusions with her hit "Techno Cumbia"." The article calls the song a template for such fusions, but does not call it "forms of pop-cumbia-rap fusions" and certainly does not call it the earliest; it only calls it one of the early ones. Even if a suporting source can be found, the hook does not mean sense, as a song cannot be a "forms of...fusions." --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

ERC (IRC client)

5x expanded by Lexein (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Berlian Hutauruk

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 02:17, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that Berlian Hutauruk, singer of the critically-acclaimed "Badai Pasti Berlalu", left her pop career to sing at churches and wedding receptions? --> Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Articles created/expanded on July 15

Veet

Blanfordia

Blanfordia bensoni

Created by Snek01 (talk). Self nom at 22:30, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-118 is online open access source. You do not need to use faith. (Sometimes also other reviewers do not know or overlook that doi link is clickable.) --Snek01 (talk) 23:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Wait, the hook is not exactly supported by this inline reference, or at least it is not well-worded either in the hook or the article. Blanfordia are one of a whole range of flora and fauna which are grouped, apparently colloquially (since the term is in quotes in the source), as Sea of Japan elements. The hook suggests, as does ambiguous wording in the article, that Blanfordia are AKA Sea of Japan elements while in fact they are simply one of the number of members in that category; lots of species are known as Sea of Japan elements, as lots of fish are known as sea creatures. You would not say a certain species of fish are called sea creatures. It would not be wrong but it does not communicate that there are many other species which are also called sea creatures. Furthermore, the entry, and the hook, barely suggest the most interesting (to me anyway) part of the story of Blanfordia, which is its evolution. This entry is a good start, but the hook is ambiguous. Can't you write a hook about the evolution of terrestriality in a non-tropical environment? That is the unusual story, at least according to your source. Alawa (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Terminology clarified in the article. ALT hooks proposed. Feel free to help me with grammar and wording of hooks.

ALTs with the word "invasion" are the most "hooky". I have also used more thematic wikilink "Terrestrial animal#Gastropods" instead of "Terrestrial animal" wikilink in the ALT6-ALT7. I would prefer ALT7, that is also hooky and extraordinary short exactly as the the ideal hook should be. --Snek01 (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Indian cricket team in England in 2011

Strauss batting for Somerset

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self nom at 19:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Indicates a season in process, not nearly complete enough for DYK. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)


Oz: the Great and Powerful

Created by Crystal Clear x3 (talk). Self nom at 23:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Done Crystal Clear x3 03:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Foreign policy of Ollanta Humala

Created by Lihaas (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Father's Lion

Created by Pigby (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 09:15, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


Fariz RM

  • ... that Indonesian singer and "poster boy" Fariz RM was questioned in relation to a 2001 bomb incident?

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 06:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that a cherry blossom made Fariz RM famous?
Review to follow. ALT is in case the first hook is too controversial. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Eros Djarot

Eros Djarot speaking in 2006

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 02:32, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that Eros Djarot (pictured) formed the Freedom Bull National Party after a disagreement with later-president Megawati Sukarnoputri?
Sounds fine to me. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:34, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

1972 World Series of Poker

5x expanded by Rymatz (talk). Self nom at 18:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Articles created/expanded on July 16

Jim Brieske

Created by Cbl62 (talk). Self nom at 01:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Jason Kipnis. See diff. Cbl62 (talk)

Lille Graah

Created by Oceanh (talk). Self nom at 22:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The first source says it was NRK's most popular programme ever and, considering there were no other national broadcasters in the 1950s, you can extrapolate to the claim quite easily. Yomangani 16:51, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

BrainyBabe (talk) 09:30, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I thought it was fine all along, AGF on the Norwegian sources. I OK'd it on 22 July, so why did someone else un-OK it three days later? Confused (still new at this) BrainyBabe (talk) 03:49, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Leon Daniel

Leon Daniel

5x expanded by User:I Jethrobot (talk). Self nom at 20:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Review: I am a new nominator. (Note: this is dated later than the above because I and other editors fixed some issues with the nomination templates I messed up when I initially made the nomination). I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 05:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
ALT 1: ... that journalist Leon Daniel (pictured right), who reported the prison escape of James Earl Ray, was also awarded the Purple Heart?
ALT 2: ... that journalist Leon Daniel (pictured right) was one of the few reporters to remain in Vietnam after the fall of Saigon? I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 18:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

1605 Keichō Nankaidō earthquake, Tsunami earthquake

  • Comment: Tsunami earthquake was created 19 July

Created by Mikenorton (talk). Self nom at 14:51, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Comment: I will have only intermittent internet access over the next several days so I may not respond rapidly to queries/comments - thanks for your patience (if required). Mikenorton (talk) 21:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Patriarch Joasaph I of Constantinople

Created by A ntv (talk). Nominated by Cplakidas (talk) at 12:33, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

The Jeremy Kyle Show (U.S. TV series)

Created by Robert Moore (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 06:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Colas Group

Created by Imgaril (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 05:19, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Anshei Minsk

Created by Vale of Glamorgan (talk). Nominated by Jayjg (talk) at 02:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Arabic Mein Kampf

  • ... that the Arabic translation of

Hitler's Mein Kampf has been a bestseller in Palestinian territories?

Created by Mbz1 (talk). Nominated by ברוקולי (talk) at 18:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Given the current state of the AfD, deletion is unlikely. Also, per the discussion, the title has been moved to Mein Kampf in the Arabic language. I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 18:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
AfD has been closed as Keep. Per H2 this should be reviewed by an uninvolved editor. Qrsdogg (talk) 06:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Joe Harrison (Louisiana politician)

  • ... that the Louisiana State Rep. Joe Harrison withdrew an immigration proposal in 2011 which would have required providers of public benefits to verify citizenship of beneficiaries?

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 04:01, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Baltimore Rock Opera Society

Grevillea cyranostigma

  • Reviewed: ] ()

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 21:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Good point - the character I guess. Casliber (talk · contribs) 13:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Eddie J. Lambert

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 15:21, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

  • I grew up near Louisiana, and I'm questioning how notable this hook is, because in plenty of communities down there, it'd be more notable to find men who don't hunt 'gators! The date and length do meet DYK criteria, however; maybe User:Billy Hathorn could come up with a more notable ALT hook? That may be difficult, given the fact that this article about a relatively obscure Louisiana state rep. is borderline for notability to begin with. No offense intended toward Billy Hathorn, who I'm sure is a great editor. NickDupree (talk) 18:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


Reviewed Fort Pitt Blockhouse
Under the Misplaced Pages rules, thank goodness, all state legislators are considered notable; so we don't have to pick and choose the ones to be favored. Billy Hathorn (talk) 00:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
ALT... Louisiana State Representative Eddie J. Lambert has pushed for income disclosure laws not only for his fellow lawmakers but for local elected officials as well?
okay, I'll allow it on this ALT. NickDupree (talk) 19:52, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

7th Combat Service Support Battalion (Australia)

Created by AustralianRupert (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 08:55, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

new, 1913 characters, mostly all cited (excspt last sentence), article could use some section and the 3rd [para is a little confusing with all the acronyms et al. alt suggested:
what is AUSBAT IX ? ive done some sectioning to try and organise it. with these it should be good to go pending the noms review.Lihaas (talk) 08:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
I redlinked it here. Wiki doesn't have anything on that Battallion, but we really should be fine for DYK :) Rcej (Robert)talk 03:57, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi everyone, just to clarify "AUSBAT X" is not a unit as such, it was a deployment, i.e. the ninth Australian battalion group deployed during Operation Citadel. If something was to be written on AUSBAT IX, IMO, it would have to be covered in an article on the overall operation (i.e. Operation Citadel). AustralianRupert (talk) 12:04, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I have reviewed 1st Airlanding Light Regiment. . Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Tatoosh Range

The Tatoosh Range in Mt. Rainier National Park, Wa.

  • ... that the highest point in the Tatoosh Range (pictured) is Unicorn Peak at 6,917 ft (2,108 m) of elevation?

Created by Rising*From*Ashes (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 08:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

  • Length:
  • Vintage:
  • Sourcing (V, RS, BLP):
  • Neutrality:
  • Plagiarism/close paraphrasing:
  • Copyvio:
  • Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting: All of the "feet" need metric conversions; please buzz me if you don't know where the conversion template is. Can you fix the italicisation of some of the dates in the ref list? This bit seems a little lame: "Changes in weather also cause danger. In 1946, heavy fog caused park employees Donald Carlson and James Pratt to get lost in the range for two days, but when the weather improved, they were able to find their way back." Tony (talk) 02:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Other comments/discussion


Lapeer County Courthouse

Lapeer County Courthouse (Lapeer, Michigan)

Created by Notorious4life (talk). Self nom at 08:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT1: ... that, completed in 1846, the Lapeer County Courthouse (pictured) is one of the 10 oldest continuously active courthouses in the United States and the oldest in Michigan?
I like ALT1 more. Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Notorious4life (talk · contribs) has more than 5 DYK credits on the usertalk. Peer review, please? --PFHLai (talk) 20:19, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 17

Faial Botanical Garden

An example image

  • ... that the function of the Faial Botanical Garden (pictured) is to preserve and maintain the collection of endemic plants common to the island of Faial and the Azores?

Created by Zeorymer (talk). Nominated by Leszek Jańczuk (talk) at 21:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

  • The external link: could you translate the title and add "(in Portuguese)"? Article images could all do with a boost to their brightness. The opening left-side images squash the text against the infobox unless your window-width is quite large; please consider relocating further down (on the right?). Could be DYKable, but needs work. Tony (talk) 01:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Grade II listed buildings in Brighton and Hove: M

An example image

Created by Hassocks5489 (talk). Nominated by Leszek Jańczuk (talk) at 21:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Société de Construction des Batignolles

Created by Imgaril (talk). Nominated by Leszek Jańczuk (talk) at 21:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Elizabeth Robins Pennell

5x expanded by BrainyBabe (talk). Self nom at 09:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Quasi-opportunistic supercomputing

Architecture

Created by History2007 (talk). Self nom at 17:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Engelberg Huller Company

Huller

Created by Nconwaymicelli (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 11:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


Active Life: Explorer

  • ... that the fitness and sports video game Active Life: Explorer is also a party game and mini-game compilation?

Created by TheLoverofLove (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 10:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Parkes ministry (1878–1883)

Created by Jherschel (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 07:50, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

George Binney

Created by User:Msrasnw (talk). Self nom at 11:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry! I think it is down to less than 200 now. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 23:49, 19 July 2011 (UTC))!
Article length & date, hook length & facts verified. I still think the hook could be trimmed down (is the fact that he wrote a book especially notable?); maybe someone else will have an opinion. Sasata (talk) 17:10, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and the tidy. I think the three things are nice to mention and the book seems, to me anyway, interesting. It is, I think, trying to explain to the "eskimos" their place in the wider world stressing to them their luck in being subjects of the British Empire! Anyway feel free if you really think it should be trimmed to trim it - I'll be OK with anything. (Msrasnw (talk) 20:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC))

Carly Foulkes, Powers (FX TV series)

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 04:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Al Lerner (composer)

Created by Elonka (talk). Self nom at 03:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

All checks out. Good to go. Aymatth2 (talk) 03:04, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Adolf Theuer

Created by WilliamH (talk). Self nom at 21:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Long enough and fresh enough ,but it has an orphan tag on it at the moment. The date formatting should to be changed to day month year format as it is about a European subject.--DavidCane (talk) 22:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
    • I also note that we have also had two other DYKs from this author on the Auschwitz gas chambers in the last couple of days are we in danger of overload?--DavidCane (talk) 22:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
      • De-orphaned and dates amended. The second concern - it did occur to me too. The reason why is because I've found some articles I'd written in various states of completion from the salvaged hard disk of my previous computer. If you wish to defer this for a few days, I have no problem with that at all. WilliamH (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
        • I'll leave it to the directors to decide on the overload issue.
        • Another question: the article on his home town of Henneborg-Bolatitz is a red-link and the modern location is in the Czech Republic. The article describes him as German, but was he reichdeutsch or volksdeutsch? His trial in Prague suggest he may have been the latter.-DavidCane (talk) 12:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
          • Good point. I gleaned this from the German Misplaced Pages, which simply describes him as deutsch. I suspect you're right, but since I can't conclusively determine it, I've omitted it. WilliamH (talk) 17:59, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Scotland national under-16 football team

Created by Deserter1 (talk). Self nom at 21:06, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Death in the Afternoon (cocktail)

5x expanded by J Milburn (talk). Self nom at 11:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Citation is fine, but at 1428 readable characters, it's 72 characters too short. Remember that the block quote does not count towards the length. The fact that Hemingway invented this is much more interesting than merely the two ingredients; I would strongly suggest this hook:
ALT: ... that Death in the Afternoon, a cocktail containing absinthe and Champagne, was invented by Ernest Hemingway? WilliamH (talk) 21:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, much prefer the alt. I've expanded the article a little further, it should be legit now. J Milburn (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Suggest not using ALT2. He learned this from someone, can't remember who now, but remember reading about it. Either Ezra Pound or James Joyce taught him to do this, and they might well have learned from a Parisian. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 02:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Lady Gaga Presents the Monster Ball Tour: At Madison Square Garden

5x expanded by Chasewc91 (talk). Self nom at 06:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Black-cheeked Gnateater

adult male Black-cheeked Gnateater

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 01:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • - Date and size fine. However, the hook fact as worded is not verified by the reference. The reference gives numbers from one particular study (based on 18 marked adults and 18 nesting attempts), while the hook reads as if the "fact" (territories averaging 2.94 hectares) is valid in general. Oceanh (talk) 02:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
More specific below - am toying with adding "11.5 cm long" to bird to highlight size difference between tiny little bird and big territory - alternately tinyness is conveyed by image.
Everything checks out, hook fact verified in cited online reference. Image license also looks good. (One minor thing, the direct link to the pdf reference does not work (says "File not available"), think the url is a temporary one. The article is accessible via the doi link though). Oceanh (talk) 17:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Elisabeth Croft

  • ... that Crossroads actress Elisabeth Croft who played Miss Edith Tatum, died the same day the renewed series of Crossroads aired in 2003?
  • ALT1... that the same day Crossroads actress Elisabeth Croft died, the first episode of the renewed series of Crossroads aired in 2003?
  • ALT2... that the same day Crossroads actress Elisabeth Croft died, the first episode of the renewed series of Crossroads aired?

Created by MayhemMario 16:22, 17 July 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 17:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC) Once reveiwed can you leave me a note on my talk page? Thanks a lot, just last time forgot about it! :) MayhemMario 16:03, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Samuel Fisk Green

Created by Kanatonian (talk). Self nom at 17:07, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Date, size checks out, but inline cite density is insufficient: the article uses 3 inline references, but only 1 reference per para. At least one para uses two references. It is thus not possible to be certain which sentence is based on which source(s), that also includes the hook claims. Once citation density is increased, or at the very least, the sentence(s) containing hook claims have their own inline cites, this article will be ready to go. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:41, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Wicklow Mountains

Tonelagee Mountain in the Glendasan valley in the Wicklow Mountains

5x expanded by Joe King (talk). Self nom at 23:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

  • A substantial revision indeed! The lead section is a bit long for my taste, and some of the 'see also's might be better embedded in the text, eg 'Climate of Ireland', but it looks to me like you're setting this up for a GA review which will no doubt consider these issues in more detail. The citation is taken in good faith as it is off line. Geof Sheppard (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


Styles and themes of Robert E. Howard

Robert E. Howard

5x expanded by AdamBMorgan (talk). Self nom at 23:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 18

Ponta das Contendas Lighthouse

Created by Zeorymer (talk). Nominated by PFHLai (talk) at 06:33, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

The Virgin Mary (book)

Created by CaliforniaAliBaba (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 11:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

IDEA: The Intellectual Property Law Review

Created by Ivylaw (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 11:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Edward Hay Mackenzie Elliot

Edward Hay Mackenzie Elliot

Created by Daemonic Kangaroo (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 03:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:


Andrew Brokos

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self nom at 05:22, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Tom McVea

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 01:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed Georgine Darcy

Zoom (The Knack album)

  • ... that just 5 years after the release of 1998 The Knack album Zoom, the band re-released the album under the title Re-Zoom with two additional tracks covering Badfinger and Elvis Costello songs?

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 00:34, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Siehe, ich will viel Fischer aussenden, BWV 88

Fishermen at the Lake of Gennesaret

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nom at 23:07, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

very interesting and well donePumpkinSky talk 00:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Tipu's Tiger

  • ... that the 18th century Indian automaton Tipu's Tiger (pictured) shows a near life-size European being mauled by a tiger, and emits wails and grunts as well as containing a pipe organ?

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk), AshLin (talk), Jdforrester (talk), (talk) and others. Self nom at 21:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed SS Clan Mackinnon (1945); diff Johnbod (talk) 21:15, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Expanded from 2718 chars, as part of the V&A Wikilounge event last weekend. Never been on DYK before. Johnbod (talk) 21:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Expansion, date and online hooks verified, offline hook refs accepted in good faith. You could make the hook a little more "punchy" by removing everything after "mauled by a tiger". But nonetheless, an interesting article. —Bruce1ee 08:41, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Know Hope Collective, Know Hope Collective (album)

Created by 3family6 (talk). Self nom at 17:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Virginia Staudt Sexton

  • ... that while psychologist Virginia Staudt Sexton was a guidance director at Fordham University she opened a psychology lab, created a major and became associate professor and chair of the psychology department?

Created by Rboateng (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 06:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Murder of Pon. Navarasu

Created by Sodabottle (talk). Self nom at 14:28, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The hook fact is not supported by the article. The article says that legislation was passed, and that Tamil Nadu was the first Indian state to pass a law banning ragging. There is no place that says this was the first anti-ragging law in India, or even in Tamil Nadu. I am also very concerned by the large number of strong uncited claims about murder, confession, and dismemberment. These facts need to be cited, or else this article cannot be used for DYK. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
The legislation passed a)bans the practice of ragging b)criminalises it. I believe this can be described as an "anti-ragging legislation/law". This is the common usage in India. A few examples of usage of this term in in RS - , . Perhaps this is a regional language variation problem. In indian english, any law banning a particular practice is called "anti-X" law in general parlance. Thus legislation banning dowry is called "anti-dowry law". If it is still confusing how about the following alt hook:
... that the murder of Pon. Navarasu led to the passage of the first legislation banning the practice of ragging in India?

or

... that the murder of Pon. Navarasu led to Tamil Nadu becoming the first Indian state to ban ragging?
And all the claims - murder, confession and dismemberment are clearly supported by the references added. In fact this single news report on the first sentencing supports all the claims you mention above -(John David, who indulged in ragging in the hostel campus, was angered over the fresher, Navarasu, for not obliging him and assaulted him in his hostel room. When Navarasu fell unconscious, David decapitated him and severed his limbs. He dumped the head, packed in a rexine bag, in a slushy pond located in the University campus, ....On November 18, David made a confessional statement and later took the policemen to places where he had disposed of parts of Navarasu's body; .....today sentenced John David, a second-year medical student of Chidambaram Annamalai University, to a double life imprisonment for murdering Pon Navarasu). This report alone supports what you claim to be uncited - "murder", "confession", "dismemberment". There are multiple other references that support the facts stated in the article like this 2011 report - (David reportedly had a fight with his junior Navarasu, son of the former vice-chancellor of Madras University, Prof P K Ponnuswamy, on November 6 and killed him in his hostel room. He then decapitated and dismembered the body and stashed it in different places.). I am puzzled why you claim the article contains uncited claims. Am i missing something here?--Sodabottle (talk) 05:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • The citations are all clustered on sentences about the legislation at the end of the paragraph. Facts need to be supported by citations placed at the end of the sentence in which they are presented, and not by citations placed on sentences five or six later. I would not know which facts are supported by which sources without going and reading the sources, which means the citations are not properly placed. Currently, all the citations in the first paragraph are positioned to support only the final two sentences, which deal only with the legislation and not the circumstances about which most of the paragraph is written.
    Either of the alternative hooks you proposed above would be suitable as the hook, but the citations problem is serious. Negative claims must be carefully cited in an article, and that has not been done here. --EncycloPetey (talk) 13:50, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Final dissolution of the Western Roman Empire

Created by DCI2026 (talk). Self nom at 05:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I can't get the picture uploaded; the one I want can be found on the document. Could anyone please help with that? DCI2026 (talk) 05:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Offline sources accepted and Alt 1 is mostly OK. However, the article has been moved to Odoacer's deposition of Romulus Augustulus and the article doesn't really state the the Empire was dissolved (it doesn't even use the word "dissolution" any more). If Alt 2 stopped at "in favor of his general Odoacer", it would be fine as a hook but that line in the article isn't (currently) directly referenced. The hooks could be reworded to match the article's new title. (Image added as requested.) - AdamBMorgan (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 19

Timema

Kiever Synagogue

List of knot terminology

  • ... that the words seizing, whipping, and lashing are all part of knot terminology?

Created by Arbitrarily0 (talk). Self nom at 23:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Gustaf Aspelin

Created by Oceanh (talk), Geschichte (talk). Self nom at 07:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Mayuranathaswami Temple, Mayiladuthurai

Created by Ravichandar84 (talk). Self nom at 01:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Wittorf affair

Created by Marrante (talk). Self nom at 18:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Sydney Harris

  • ... that Canadian judge Sydney Harris rulings include the 1978 acquittal of gay magazine Body Politic of obscenity charges and convicting NHL player Dino Ciccarelli after he assaulted another hockey player during a game?

Created by Vale of Glamorgan (talk). Self nom at 14:40, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Dorothy Reitman

Created by Vale of Glamorgan (talk). Self nom at 14:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

  • no inline ref for hook in the article, though all other sources confirm the fact, so I will fix that. But there is no source for the most interesting part of the article which is about the kidnapping. If you have a source for this, please add it, because without a ref, I wondered if this was vandalism. Alawa (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Piva Monastery

Piva Monastery

Created by Rosiestep (talk), Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Dr. Blofeld (talk) at 08:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Tummalapalle Uranium mine

  • ... that recent findings at Tummalapalle Uranium mine will substantially increase India's capability of producing energy from nuclear plants and at lower cost.?

Created by Sachinvenga (talk). Self nom at 06:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Could do with some copyediting, and some parts look similar to sources. Maybe a more interesting hook could be something along the lines of "one of the largest reserves of uranium in the world". Christopher Connor (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • ALT1:... that With possibly one of the largest reserves of uranium in the world, Tummalapalle Uranium mine will substantially increase India's capability of producing nuclear energy and that-to at lower cost.? -- . Shlok talk . 04:46, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I have made some copy editing to the article regarding removing similarity to sources.-- . Shlok talk . 06:06, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
    I'm afraid we have to be modest with the hook here. All claims of largest reserves come from newspapers referring to some statements by Indian officials. Until this is confirmed by proper authorities (like USGS or/and international bodies) this is not reliable - mining news are so closely related to politics and stock exchange that they were too often misused in the past. Materialscientist (talk) 06:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I don't think the writing is good enough yet to be featured on the main page, and not sure checks have been thorough enough. For example, the sentence beginning "In the initial period of operation of mine", as well as being incomprehensible, is largely similar to the source. "upcoming uranium mine" doesn't sound right. The second paragraph says that Srikumar Banerjee has 49,000 tonnes in him. Just examples, there are more. Christopher Connor (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
    Concur. Many grammar glitches actually originate from the sources (mostly Indian newspapers). I am brushing them up from time to time, but those are merely quick patches. Materialscientist (talk) 04:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Box Cutter (Breaking Bad)

5x expanded by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self nom at 17:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Expedition to Lapland

Carl Linnaeus

Created by Limulus (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 09:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The ref is fine ("100 or more" would be a more accurate representation of the source though). Wouldn't this article be better at Linnaeus' expedition to Lapland or something similar? Other people have made expeditions to Lapland (Maupertuis for example). Also it wasn't actually the modern Swedish Lapland that he went to but part of the historical Sami region which from the Swedish historical perspective was probably Lappmarken at the time. Yomangani 13:45, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Oregon Slough Railroad Bridge

Oregon Slough Railroad Bridge

Created by SJ Morg (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 08:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


Rugrats: Time Travelers

Created by TheLoverofLove (talk). Nominated by OCNative (talk) at 08:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

:* Good to go. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Plot section looks like a close paraphrase of the game manual (see this) (and badly written). Can't check gameplay section but suspicious. This isn't in the article but presumably is supposed to be ref 5, and also similar. The article also says 1997 but the source says 1999. Christopher Connor (talk) 15:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Illusion of transparency

  • ... that by simply knowing about and understanding the illusion of transparency you can effectively reduce speech anxiety?

5x expanded by KJamison7 (talk). Self nom at 02:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

the DYK fact is not supported by an inline source. Length and expansion threshold met. date ok. There are grammatical and spelling errors to be fixed in this article. The critical sentence for the DYK is almost unintelligible, but I believe it can be edited to read well, assuming there is a reference that supports the intended meaning. Alawa (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


So Long, Frank Lloyd Wright

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 00:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

St Martin's Church, Bowness-on-Windermere

St Martin's Church, Bowness-on-Windermere

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 19:54, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


Je suis né d'une cigogne

Created by MorelMWilliam (talk). Self nom at 16:29, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

How about
  • This hook does not make sense. Also, the Time Out source does not say so much about Godard; it only says that the film tries to emulate Godard, but it does not give an opinion about whether Godard ever filmed subjects such as forged passports for crossing the border. Binksternet (talk) 02:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
There is a separate section talking about the film adopting Godard's techniques, along with multiple sources supporting it. All the reviews that the movie received talks about Godard. How about changing the hook to,
Children of the stork is the english title of the film. They are characters in the film too. And the film adopts Godard's style. ALT 3 doesn't look like a hook but rather a summary of the whole fact. morelMW 07:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
In that case, the English title should be capitalized and placed in bold italics like this: Children of the Stork. Once you are using the actual title of the film, you cannot say the titular "Children" take from Godard. Instead, you would say that the film Children of the Stork draws from Godard's films (especially Breathless) except for the problem that the Time Out London reference does not support the assertion that the passport theme was not also drawn from Godard. Binksternet (talk) 08:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree with Binksternet's earlier comments, alts 1 and 2 are unintelligible to me. Binksternet's alt looks fine, I guess the name could be changed to the English title if that is confirmed by the sources. Gatoclass (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
What is the need to include Tony Gatlif in the hook? The movie has Godard's techniques and the sources have the english name in them. A hook shouldn't necessarily be a summary, and the hooks suggested by me aren't misleading in any way. And why should there be 'film' in it? Wouldn't the readers who click on the link be able to find that it is a film? And the hook doesn't state that the passport theme is taken from Godard. morelMW 08:59, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
The hooks suggested by you are not necessarily misleading, they are unintelligible, as Gatoclass also opines above; which is to say they are written in a way such that I have absolutely no idea what they're stating (or trying to state). Nikthestoned 11:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Well, all I intended the hook to state is that Children of the stork follows Godard's techniques, along with the characters in it forging passports, as simple as it can be. I dont want a summary in the hook with words like 'movie', 'characters' or even, 'director' as that would make the hook dull. If you have an another alternative incorporating this, try suggesting one. morelMW 11:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
How about this?
That hook is ungrammatical, apart from which our rules state that If the subject is a work of fiction or a fictional character, the hook must involve the real world in some way - in other words, you can't conflate the real and the imaginary as you are doing here. The only compliant hook suggested thus far is still that proposed by Binkersternet. Gatoclass (talk) 11:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
What exactly is the grammatical flaw in the hook? Children of the stork is capitalised, and it is the film's title. The hook has no fictional elements, as it now only states that 'Children of the stork', the movie, has passports forged in its plot and also draws from Godard. morelMW 12:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
It's just badly written, I'm afraid. You're missing many qualifying things to make it readable. E.g.,
This, however, is unsuitable as the general theme of the book and movie are in Godard's style, not the specific act of forging passports. Nikthestoned 12:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Okay, before we waste any more time on this, I'll propose an alt which I think gets MW's point across in an intelligible way:

Seems fine to me, though does the article specifically state that the stork does the forging? Nikthestoned 12:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I noticed that myself, so I changed it to "obtain". Gatoclass (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Why should a hook have everything? The hook,
ALT3: ... that Children of the stork has passports forged to cross the Franco-German border, apart from drawing inspiration from Godard?
as a standalone, is far more hooky than the dull versions spun out later. I don't see any grammatical flaws in it, and this is the best way to state the fact without summarising, unlike your attempts.. morelMW 12:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Three people now have informed you that your preferred hook is both ungrammatical and unintelligible, it's not going to get accepted so please stop proposing it. Gatoclass (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Well then what is the grammatical flaw in my latest hook? Requirements for a hook's intelligibility shouldn't demand a summary for a hook! Why should the hook say 'the movie' children of the stork? Maybe Alt 3 can be modified to,
ALT3: ... that Children of the stork has passports forged to cross the Franco-German border, apart from its drawing inspiration from Godard?

morelMW 13:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Any mention of passports and the border fails Extra Rule #C6. Binksternet (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

How about this?

ALT6: ... that Gatlif's Children of the Stork gives a thesis on inter country border issues and alienation apart from drawing inspiration from Godard?
for easy verification, this fact is supported by the Timeout review. morelMW 13:32, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
You are trying to do say two things when only one thing is needed. You are trying to say that Gatlif drew inspiration from Godard, which is supported, and that Gatlif's plot elements of forged passports and border crosssings were not drawn from Godard. The Time Out London source does not support this second assertion, and it is the only reference in the "Themes and analysis" section of the article. Binksternet (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I am not trying to say what you tried to infer from the review. Doesn't the review talk about the thesis on border issues? Does the review talk about Godard? Does the hook read like the film's take on border crossings to be not inspired from Godard? If yes, try again. It talks about two separate things, well referenced by not one, but many other sources which are in the subsections under Themes section. Could you try now. morelMW 15:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't approve of ALT6 because it is clunky English. I'm not going to research the sources to see what can be salvaged. Binksternet (talk) 15:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I can't figure what is clunky here though am sure that ALT6 is fine. morelMW 15:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
May I suggest we flip ALT6 to get ALT7: ... that Gatlif's Children of the Stork draws on Godardian filmic techniques to explore the alienation of border crossers? Yngvadottir (talk) 17:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
ALT7 is approved. Binksternet (talk) 17:12, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
ALT7 reads more like a dull clinical prescription than a DYK hook. Why should it have 'filmic' in it? ALT6 is just fine to go. 'Alienation of border crossers' is also not supported by the sources along with sounding awkward.
ALT6: ... that Gatlif's Children of the Stork gives a thesis on inter country border issues and alienation, along with drawing inspiration from Godard?morelMW 17:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
"Filmic" to satisfy the rule that it has to be clear where the boundary lies between the fictional world and the real world—it makes clear it's a film. You're trying to combine the inspiration from Godard and the themes, but it's not clear why that should be interesting or surprising. So since you're right, ALT7 isn't one of the more interesting hooks on this page, but "gives a thesis" sounds really, really uninteresting, how about we go back to one of the more startling features of the film:

Is that better? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Sounds a bit odd to me, I'd prefer the term "metaphorical stand-in", as used in the article. Nikthestoned 18:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
'Metaphorical stand-in' is a chaser for a hook. How about,
morelMW 05:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • The ALT8 suggestion is okay, as was ALT7. The ALT9 suggestion fails Extra Rule #C6 because it is about the plot elements alone, not how the film relates to the real world. Binksternet (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • ALT9 is not just about the plot elements, it relates to the real world in the part 'In Gatlif's' which makes it very clear that it is in the movie. morelMW 15:28, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Pink Robin, White-rumped Robin, White-winged Robin, Black-chinned Robin, Slaty Robin, White-browed Robin, Grey-headed Robin, Ashy Robin, Black-sided Robin, Black-throated Robin, Eopsaltria

adult male Pink Robin

  • Comment: not finished this multihook yet... could feasibly add one or two more but that would require energy, time and inclination I lack. Any idea how many hooks I should review...?

Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC) 5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 15:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Given all the other stuff you do around the DYK project Casliber, I would have thought that five was enough - any other views? Mikenorton (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Pink Robin - length, date, image status, referencing, and hook ref OK and no close paraphrasing found. Mikenorton (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Sorry, I think this is impractical from the perspective of reviewing, visually against the other hooks, and the utterly unlikely prospect that readers will know what to click on. If it's to be a random click, this is spreading it very thin. I think two (three exceptional) should be the limit. Tony (talk) 13:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
    • While I share some of your concerns about multihooks, this issue has been discussed quite recently at WT:DYK and as far as I remember there was not yet a consensus to eliminate these kinds of hooks. Anyway, WT:DYK would be a more appropriate place to discuss this, rather than holding up the progress of one hook which right now isn't breaking any DYK rules. rʨanaɢ (talk) 16:20, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Vojihna

Created by Zoupan (talk). Self nom at 17:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Articles created/expanded on July 20

James E. Lawrence

Queen of Sheba's Palace

Ruins of Queen of Sheba's Palace in Aksum

  • ... that the ruined palace (pictured) in Axum, Ethiopia, originally built in the 10th century B.C. was once home of the Queen of Sheba?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 12:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • There is already an article on Dungur (with a redirect from Palace of the Queen of Sheba); you might consider merging some of the content of this article into that one. Some of the sources in this article are suspect (much as I like the Rasta headline) as is the claim that it was once home to the Queen of Sheba (evidence for both her identity and the location of Sheba is sketchy). Yomangani 01:43, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Tsukabaru Dam

Tsukabaru Dam

  • ... that the 87 metres (285 ft) high Tsukabaru Dam (pictured) built on the Mimi River in 1938 was the highest gravity type dam in Japan but since relegated to second place after building of the Kamishiba Dam?

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Self nom at 11:34, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Optimalism

  • ... that Optimalism has health benefits and can be a learned skill?

5x expanded by User:AMJonesPT (talk). Self nom at 02:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

The article reads like an essay ("many believe", "many children question", etc.); it needs a rewrite, better sourcing and clarifying the difference between optimism and optimalism. Materialscientist (talk) 00:42, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Malcolm Venville

Created by Gamaliel (talk). Self nom at 23:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

I should have noted that I have a copy of the text from a newspaper database of that article used to source the hook I'm willing to send to anyone who emails me a request for it. Gamaliel (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Judy's Turn to Cry

5x expanded by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 18:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Since this was originally a redirect, I'd count this as an original creation and not an expansion, but either way it meets the criteria. I took the liberty of changing the first "earlier" in the hook to "previous" to avoid repetition. Gamaliel (talk) 23:37, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • The hook needs to be written more interestingly. "Did you know that X is a Y" hooks are rarely interesting. This sort of hook could be improved simply by making it more 'active', as in "... that in the song "Judy's Turn to Cry", singer Lesley Gore gloats about the return of a boy she had cried about in an earlier song?". That still is not ideal, though, since it's still more of a definition of the topic than an interesting fact; is there anything else that can be used? rʨanaɢ (talk) 01:39, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Communication strategies

Created by Mr. Stradivarius (talk). Self nom at 13:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • None of the three sources are inline, so I do not see how this DYK can be approved. Further, I question the validity of this article as written; the topic of communication strategy goes far beyond the technical use of the term as defined in this narrow portion of the field of linguistics here. The hook itself is indicative of how vague and utterly incomplete the whole presentation is. This may be an inappropriate venue for that larger discussion, but the article can hardly be judged better than a stub when its explicit topic is vast, and if it were so judged, which I hope someone with that authority will now do, it would not qualify for DYK.Alawa (talk) 18:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi Alawa, and thanks for looking over my DYK nomination. I agree that the topic of "communication strategies" is potentially vast, and that this article is only dealing with the topic as it is presented in second language acquisition literature. I don't think this means that it fails the DYK criteria though - I don't see that anywhere on the selection criteria list. I would be open to renaming the article to something like communication strategies in second language acquisition, though, if that would help. Thinking of it as an encyclopaedic topic, though, I think it would be best to leave it where it is, and then people are free to expand/edit it as they see fit. As for the citations, the hook is cited inline, and the article in general uses inline citations - maybe you were confusing this criterion with online references? It is not necessary to have the references online to get a hook accepted at DYK. — Mr. Stradivarius 16:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate being educated in the criteria. (is it just me or are they changing the procedures rather often?) I can accept the references in good faith. If that gets you a DYK, good for you. However, my concern over the disjuncture of your topic (extremely broad) and your discussion (vanishingly narrow and clearly a stub) remains profound. That disparity leads to a hook that has almost no meaning. Specifically, your hook misses the point-- saying X instead of Y is not a strategy; coining a new word is. That is how I read your entry, at any rate. Perhaps you could say *ALT1 ... that linguists have identified several communication strategies used in learning a second language, including coining new words? And even if that works for you, I still encourage you to see if your content would not be better integrated within the article on second language acquisition. IMO that is where it belongs, instead of creating a future problem of disambiguation if someone wants to actually write about communication strategy, which is, after all, a robust field of its own. But that is up to you. Alawa (talk) 02:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
I don't mind changing the hook at all - my one was just the snappiest one that I came up with. Your example is definitely more solid, and will mean more to readers, even if it might not get as much click-through. But that's fine by me. As for the content, well, I may be able to expand it, but not for the next day or two, as I will be busy. I shall post back here if I expand it, and otherwise leave it to the best judgement of the editors here. Also, it could and probably should go in second language acquisition - I've been slowly building that article and its daughter articles up, and this time I just chose to write the daughter article first. As it stands it's probably a little too big for a merge - it would have to be condensed. Still, even if it doesn't get a DYK I don't think it will do any harm being there by itself. — Mr. Stradivarius 06:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
No great harm, anyway, and I could be wrong about this being the right way to seed a large, complex entry. But as for the DYK, the fact that we appear to agree it is not a fully-developed article in the sense intended by the Additional Rules for DYK (D7: There is a reasonable expectation that an article—even a short one—that is to appear on the front page should appear to be complete and not some sort of work in progress) makes it hard to give it a green light, with all respect, even with my own Alt1 in play. Sorry to take that hard line. I'll leave this as a open question, however, in case another editor wants to venture an opinion. Good luck on the next one. Alawa (talk) 01:05, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Terrapene carolina

A male eastern box turtle (a sub-species of common box turtle) from Maryland

  • ... that the male common box turtle (pictured) has to lean back past the vertical to mate with the female?

5x expanded by TCO (talk). Nominated by Pigsonthewing (talk) at 10:47, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

  • turtle hug!

Praunus flexuosus

Created by Stemonitis (talk). Self nom at 08:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Furiiru people

Created by Neutrality (talk). Self nom at 06:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: Invasion of Banu Nadir. Neutrality 06:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

The Paul Winchell Show

Created by Billy Hathorn (talk). Self nom at 03:49, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT ... that Carol Burnett made her television debut in 1955 in a episode of the NBC puppetry series The Paul Winchell Show?
Reviewed Walter E. Lawrence
  • Close paraphrasing or direct lifts from sources throughout, apart from one paragraph in the final section and an apparently inaccurate reference to Carol Burnett's debut. Yomangani 23:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Invasion of Banu Nadir

  • ... that according to Islamic tradition, the Invasion of the Banu Nadir tribe was ordered by Muhammad because he was told by God that some members of the tribe were planning to assassinate him.

Created by Misconceptions2 (talk). Self nom at 00:01, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Will it be possible to include the image that is on that page as part of the hook?--Misconceptions2 (talk) 00:11, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Lowercase i in invasion. Neutrality 06:06, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
Yes, it should have a lowercase i.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

According to Misplaced Pages Reliable Sources noticeboard , the source that is in debate i.e the Sealed Nectar, maybe used. However some users have complained about its overuse in the article.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 23:29, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Some problems which need to be addressed before this can be suitable for the main page.

  • Have you checked that Witness Pioneer and The Sealed Nectar, whence you're getting almost all your information, are reliable sources? They appear to be spiritual rather than scholarly - it's along the lines of citing Christianity.com or a book published by Zondervan, rather than a real publisher, for an article on a well-known episode in Biblical history. There's no shortage of scholarship on the history and texts of Islam, so we do not need to resort to inferior sources. (The "award" The Sealed Nectar won is from the Muslim World League, a group with religious aims - not from any sort of scholarly or publishing organization.)
The Sealed Nectar is a notable source, i used it to give the views of Muslim scholars rather than give an accurate view. I think the source is partly reliable.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm sure you think it's reliable - that's presumably why you used it - but I disagree, so I'm asking you to establish that it's reliable through something like RSN. The entire article is built on this one source, which is really questionable; unless the source is determined to be reliable, an article that relies so heavily on it cannot possibly appear on the main page. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 21:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
How is the entire article built on 1 source? Maybe you meant to say that the source is over used, and should not be?--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • If the Witness Pioneer site is just an online version of The Sealed Nectar, do not cite both. It gives the false impression that the statement is supported by multiple sources.
I will merge them, thanks. Fixed in thisedit--Misconceptions2 (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • In the article, you include the hook fact as Mubarakpuri's opinion; Mubarakpuri, in his source, states it as fact; in the hook, you say it is "tradition." Please reconcile: obviously we're not going to state it as fact, but if you're going to say it's tradition, you need something that actually says so, not just one author making the claim.
I dont get what you mean? I said according to Islamic tradition, which means according to Muslim sources? I dont see anything wrong with saying "According to Islamic tradition"--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Why is a claim ostensibly to be found in the Encyclopedia of Islam sourced to the Jewish Publication Society of America? Is this a mistake, or are you getting the claim at secondhand?
Yes that was an error. I mixed up the sources. Fixed in this edit--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:03, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Possible synthesis: does Shaffi, in Reliance of the Traveller, specifically refer to this event in any way? If it's just commentary on the surah without reference to the event, it belongs in the article on the surah, not here.
Shaffi based his belief of burning down trees on a hadith about banu nadir. But i have removed the info all together. in this edit
  • The last section is basically trivia; "this book mentions this event in passing without giving any information about it" is not useful.
This is extremely useful in my opinion, as it mentions the primary sources and quotes them.
  • Your lead isn't very good. It should be a summary of the article contents. Right now, it contains no information about the actual attack, but gives prominent place to trivial mentions of the attack in other texts and to debate about a minor point in the justification of the attack.

--Roscelese (talkcontribs) 19:43, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

What do you suggest as an alternative? I recently made this about the islamic tradition claim.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Note that I will be replying to these on the article talk page, to avoid being repetitive. Roscelese (talkcontribs) 22:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Article is a WP:POVFORK of Banu Nadir and has some serious issues as I explained on the talk page Talk:Invasion of Banu Nadir#POV fork. Al-Andalusi (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Death of Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed

5x expanded by Yk Yk Yk (talk). Self nom at 22:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Current nominations

Articles created/expanded on July 21

South Africa Conciliation Committee

The Mermaid Inn

The Mermaid Inn

Created by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Nvvchar (talk), Hassocks5489 (talk), and Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 12:41, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Length, date check out, hook fact supported by ref (1730s removed from hook as not explicitly mentioned), Image suitably licenced for use on mp. Mjroots (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Yoshio Harada

5x expanded by Michitaro (talk). Self nom at 15:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Palaeontinidae

A giant cicada fossil.

Created by Obsidian Soul (talk). Self nom at 02:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Excellent, well-cited article and lovely photo. Hook fact verified in on-line copy of cited source. Article is certainly long enough and is "new" (was in user namespace before). --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

HMS Endymion (1865)

5x expanded by Mjroots (talk). Self nom at 19:40, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

  • The article is long enough and new enough (more than 5x expanded), but the hook is supported only by a claim in a self-published website, with no indication of where that particular "fact" originated. I've checked all the information on the source page, some of which is quoted from the Times (and would be suitably supported), but the claim of last wooden frigate built at Woolwich Dockyard is not supported. In fact, the source article says it was the last one launched from Deptford Dockyard, which is not the same as last one built. Even if the hook were changed to reflect this, the source is still self-puliched and does not comply with WP:Reliable. Can you suggest another hook? --EncycloPetey (talk) 14:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • WP:SPS does not rule out self-published sources completely, only where BLPs are involved, which is not the case here. I say that the source is reliable, with much of the info given being corroborated by RSs. We have RSs that say Endymion was built at Woolwich Deptford, and it was even speculated in the press that she would prove to be the last wooden frigate built there. Will work on another hook once I've finished filling in details from more local newspaper sources. Mjroots (talk) 21:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
    I don't understand how you can call the source reliable when it doesn't meet WP criteria for reliability, and even the RSs are giving information at odds with the source that you're calling reliable; if the RSs says it was built at Woolwich, then why does the source say it was launched from Deptford? The claim of Woolwich is not supported by the cited source, and is contradicted by it. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

ALT1 ... that a plan to use HMS Endymion as a flagship at Harwich was abandoned due to loss of HMS Vanguard? Mjroots (talk) 08:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

I reviewed The Mermaid Inn. Mjroots (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
See talk:HMS Endymion for explanation of how to view newspaper sourcs online if you are a UK editor with a library card. Mjroots2 (talk) 21:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Sadly, I am neither a UK editor nor do I have a current library card or access to a decent library (other than my own personal one, which covers other subjects). --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

If Day

  • ... that the 1942 Nazi invasion of Winnipeg, known as If Day, was the city's largest military manoeuvre to date?

5x expanded by Nikkimaria (talk). Self nom at 18:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

She's a Fool

Created by Rlendog (talk). Self nom at 14:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Emerita analoga

Emerita analoga (Crustacea: Hippidae)

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Stemonitis (talk) at 07:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


Tumblebug Complex Fire

Smoke rising from the Tumblebug Complex Fire

Created by Jsayre64 (talk). Self nom at 01:07, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

sources check, Jsayre64 says the length is good, but the number of 14570 does not seem to be sourced. Your article says 13,000 at the end with a reference. Either add a reference in the lede for the total figure, or better, edit your last line to reflect the higher number with its source. Otherwise, well documented. Alawa (talk) 01:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
I actually provided a citation for 14,570. It's in the infobox. The fire was burning 13,000 on September 29, 2009. It kept growing after that. I'll add some citations to the lead, though. Jsayre64 (talk) 16:03, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
Good to go then. Sorry, I overlooked the ref in the infobox. Good luck with this! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alawa (talkcontribs) 17:46, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Wigman House

Created by GrapedApe (talk). Self nom at 05:02, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


Peter of Diokleia

Personal seal saying "Peter, archon of Diokleia, Amen", found in the 19th century.

  • ... that archon Peter (seal pictured) is the oldest known ruler of the medieval region of Duklja, in present-day Montenegro?

Created by Zoupan (talk). Self nom at 17:27, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Article is only 1200 chars long, and the article is more about the seal and region than about Peter himself. The article itself states that "The only information on him is from a seal found in the 19th century.", so I rather doubt that the article can be expanded with additional information. It might be possible to convert the article to discuss the seal, which seems to have an interesting history from the time of its discovery, but otherwise I don't think the article can qualify for DYK.
    I have (in hope that the article can be salvaged) modified hook to indicate that it is Peter's seal that is pictured, not Peter himself (the seal features the Virgin Mary and child); and I've appended to the end an indication of where in the world Duklja is located. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Tihomil of Rascia

Created by Zoupan (talk). Self nom at 17:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on July 22

Olaflur

  • ... that olaflur, a toothpaste ingredient for the prevention of caries, is synthesized from cattle's tallow?

5x expanded by Anypodetos (talk). Self nom at 20:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Date, length, expansion good. Off-line hook accepted. Thanks. -IceCreamAntisocial (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Rodney Blake (basketball)

Created by Jrcla2 (talk). Self nom at 15:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Forth Valley Royal Hospital

Created by Warburton1368 (talk). Self nom at 20:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Jason Kipnis

5x expanded by Epeefleche Self nom --Epeefleche (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Reviewed: Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project
  • Expansion and date verified. However, there are problems with the hook. First, the sourcing for the "all-conference" football status is Kipnis' bio from the Arizona State web site, which is not independent (Kipnis was a student-athlete at ASU), and, more importantly, which does not provide any specificity as to the claim of "all-conference' football status. If he was truly an all-conference football player, surely a more specific (and independent) source can be found? Second, the hook fact is lifted verbatim from the source. The article states: "He was an All-Conference wide receiver (setting school records for catches, yards, and touchdowns in a season) ..." The source states: "was an All-Conference wide receiver, setting school records for catches, yards and TDs in a season." In looking over the article, it also appears to have a POV of trying to oversell his accomplishments. He has yet to even appear in a Major League Baseball game as of today (may debut tonight or tomorrow). As an example, the second sentence in the lead opened, "He is considered one of the top prospects in baseball." Two sources were cited, but only one of them mentioned his status as a prospect. That source, a Baseball America article from Feb. 2011, rates him #54 on its list of the top 100 prospects. I modified the statement to make it more precise. My suggestion is as follows: Come up with a more reliable source for the football-related hook, or come up with a different hook. Also, you need to give the article a careful check to try to eliminate instances of potential close paraphrasing and exaggerations of his accomplishments. Drop me a note when this is done, and I'll give it another look. You'll also need to complete a quid pro quo review. Cbl62 (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I took a closer look and don't see significant plagiarism issues with the article or with other instances of exaggeration. Given the focus of late on close paraphrasing, however, you should re-work the sentence noted above. Take care of that, and find a better source for the all-conference honors, and we should be good to go. I have also changed the initial caps "All-Conference" to "all-conference" in the hook and made Cleveland Indians possessive. Cbl62 (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Tx for taking a closer look. I've now added a third reference to him being an All-Conference wide receiver. I reverted your revert of initial caps, per the added source (and one of the two already existing refs). As far as "close paraphrasing" is concerned, that's a non-issue here given the three sources and the language itself.
Also, I'm not sure we need an apostrophe here. Usage allows us to dispense with it, as we would dispense with it when referring to "New York Mayor Bloomberg" -- I think that you are getting confused by the fact that there is an "s" in the team name ... see for example this recent headline from the New York Times: "From a Long Toss From Shea to a Mets Closer", or NESN/Major League Baseball's "Cleveland Indians Pitcher Fausto Carmona Trips While Running Bases, Placed on DL".--Epeefleche (talk) 22:17, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
The concern I have was with the "All-Conference" assertion in the media guides/bios of the colleges for which Kipnis played. These are not independent sources, and when reciting high school honors, these college media guide-type sources (in my experience) are often imprecise and in many cases inaccurate. In this case, I dug for the original source on the supposed "all-conference" honors and have added the more precise information to the article. Kipnis was selected for the all-star football team for the Central Suburban League's North Division (a group consisting of six suburban Chicago high schools). I'd suggest instead going with an alternative hook, and I've suggested a couple below. Since I've now become involved in editing the article, it would probably be best for another review to make a final decision on this hook:
If the initial hook is to be considered, the term "All-Conference" should not be capitalized. This is a common mistake, even in some media outlets. The use of all caps is appropriate where the group referenced is a proper noun (e.g., "All-American" or "All-Big Ten Conference") or where it's an official designation of a recognized body (e.g., the NFL's "All-Pro" team), but it is not correct when used generically to refer to something like an "all-conference" team. Another grammatical note on the first hook. The apostrophe should be used in the original forumulation. It is, of course, acceptable to refer to "New York Mayor Blumberg" or "Cleveland Indians pitcher Joe Smith" as a descriptive term without an apostrophe. However, by inserting the article "the" in front of the phrase, it becomes a possessive term and requires an apostrophe. Thus, no apostrophe needed in the two alt hooks (which are not possessive) but is needed in the original hook. At least, that's the way the nuns drilled it into us back in Catholic school in the 1970s. Cbl62 (talk) 15:47, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
The half-dozen refs supporting the statement in the initial hook include the highest-level RS for a baseball player, Mlb.com. Which, btw, initial-capitilized "All Conference" ("Was an All-Conference wide receiver, setting school records for catches, yards and TDs in a season"). The hook is eminently well-sourced to the highest-level source for baseball player, and its format follows that of the RS.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I don't see anywhere on the cited mlb.com page where it says Kipnis was an "All-Conference wide receiver. Can you direct to where that is said? Cbl62 (talk) 21:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I found it. There's a link on that page to "Bio." This bio does repeat the statement about him being an All-Conference wide receiver, which is the same vague statement taken verbatim from prior bios. The only primary record of an All-Conference selection remains, however, his selection to the CSL, North Division all-star team selected by the "Pioneer Press." Vague and unsupported references to "all-conference" and "All-American" honors are rampant in American sports and one of my pet peeves. I continue to think one of the alt hooks would be preferable. However, the original hook could also be used given the reliability of mlb.com. If the original hook is used, the use of initial caps on "All-Conference" and the missing apostrophe need to be fixed. Cbl62 (talk) 21:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
The RS support for the statement appears in the highest-level RS for baseball players. There's no reason to not accept it. The fact that one editor dislikes the statement, reflected in baseball's highest-level RS, as well as by two separate colleges, etc., is no reason to not accept a hook. I'm happy with the RSs' sense as to what is appropriate, over the POV of "editor x". What we have is eminently sufficient -- we don't need a "primary record" as you suggest. And the format used by the official site of major league baseball -- all caps -- is preferable to the personal POV predilictions, and personal pet peeves, of "editor x". Frankly, this is getting a bit silly, IMHO.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Calling me "silly," reverting my edits with edit summaries saying my comments were "misleading," and canvasing for support on other talk pages (as I've seen you do here) is not helpful. I really was trying to help improve your article and hook, and you should not assume that I'm pushing a POV. My goal is not to push any POV, but to ensure accuracy of a hook to be featured on the Main Page. I believe my comments were and remain apt, and that a more precise statement about his being on the all-star team selected by the Pioneer Press for the CSL North Division is more accurate and informative than a vague assertion of generic "All-Conference" status. But in light of the surprising charge that I am pushing "personal POV predilictions," I'll let someone else make the call. Cbl62 (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
This is getting too long and off-topic for this page. I'll respond on the talk page of Baseball Bugs, the seasoned baseball editor (as you've responded only there, and not to my messages on your talk page). Apologies if you thought I was calling you silly; as I said, "this" is getting a bit silly, IMHO. Also, contacting one informed but uninvolved baseball editor, "Baseball Bugs", who is known for expertise in the field and asking his view on a baseball subject is not canvassing. More to the point -- let's let someone else opine. We have the highest-level baseball RS supporting the statement used in the original hook. IMHO, there is no issue here; the original hook is fine.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:21, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
I'm not sure that I see anything wrong with any of the other hooks offered as alternatives, but how about ALT 3 "... that Jason Kipnis, who was just called up from the minor leagues by the Cleveland Indians, played collegiate baseball at Arizona State University, where he double-majored in psychology and sociology?" as an alternative. Alansohn (talk) 22:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for agreeing that there is not anything wrong w/the initial hook. And thanks for the third-hook suggestion; the issue I have with that is it is far less "hooky" than the initial hook. The hookiness of the initial hook comes from the fact that he did something notable (which is not the case in alt 3 -- double majoring in those subjects is not IMHO very notable), and it was in a different sport than baseball. Tx.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Respectfully, I don't see how being the best wide receiver in a group of 6 suburban high schools is all that notable. The alt 1 hook I offered contains a more significant claim to notability in the football world. Also, I'm not sure Allansohn was agreeing there's nothing wrong with the initial hook. Cbl62 (talk) 02:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
I would be more than happy to approve the initial hook and the two alternatives, based on the sources provided, my only issue here is coming up with the most appealing hook. I always find that a person who does two different things well makes for an interesting hook, and the more different the more interesting, though being able to do two slightly more similar things at an extremely high level is also hooky. The original and alternate hook both address his playing football. The original is acceptable and the sourcing is adequate, but the ALT 1 hook is definitely better than the original. Being an all-conference wide receiver means that you're deemed to be one of probably two or three best at the position among what could be a few dozen teams. A professional baseball player being called "one of the top receivers in the state" in football, among hundreds of teams in a state like Illinois, is far hookier to me than the original. ALT 2, that someone who made it to the major leagues was a top prospect to make it to the major leagues doesn't hit me as being too hooky; He was touted in essence as a can't miss professional baseball player and he didn't. My ALT 3 was intended to play off the fact that academic issues in college are often treated as an afterthought by most athletes, leading to the jokes about classes in simplified geology designed for athletes being called "rocks for jocks", yet Kipnis not only managed to play baseball at the top collegiate level, but found the time and effort to major in two separate fields of study. I find my own ALT 3 to better meet my criteria (but then again, that just shows that I like what I like), but in terms of the other suggest hooks, I'd go with ALT 1. Alansohn (talk) 17:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Jacquie de Creed

  • ... that English stunt performer Jacquie de Creed claimed to be one of only a few people in Britain who could drive a car on its side, balanced on two wheels?

Created by TheRetroGuy (talk). Self nom at 18:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed St Bartholomew's Church, Penn. TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:55, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Hook is cited to a newspaper report of the content of her personal website (which is still up); it doesn't get more reliable because it is reported secondhand. Why not use her unbroken World Record in the hook? It's more interesting and less wishy-washy. Yomangani 02:31, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

St Bartholomew's Church, Penn

St Bartholomew's Church, Penn.jpg

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 18:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

. Hook and length all check out. Good to go. TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Scirpus ancistrochaetus

Created by IceCreamAntisocial (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 08:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Hydriomena? protrita

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self nom at 08:08, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Saint Paul Seminary (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania)

Created by Alekjds (talk). Self nom at 06:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

  • ref for first hook not great. transcription of newspaper. second hook is tricky. ref states they intend to sell house but we don't know if it ever got sold....do we? size and date of article check out. Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Eynesbury Rovers F.C.

5x expanded by Number 57 (talk). Self nom at 23:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Article prose expanded from to 296 to 2383 characters. Reviewed Yakee A Dangerous Liaison. Alternative hook could be "... that Sir Stanley Matthews played for Eynesbury Rovers in the match that set their record attendance?" Number 57 23:56, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project

Created by Vanisaac (talk). Self nom at 00:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Hi. Date, size, size of hook verified. I think we need some third-party, independent sourcing here. The references all appear to be by the Project itself. Others are welcome to opine as well.--Epeefleche (talk) 22:31, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
  • Is the extra sourcing to document facts, establish notability, or to do something else? If someone has access to the New York Times archives, the Did You Know? factoid was front page, above the fold in September, 1984 - so it should be easily confirmable. So what are we looking for here? VIWS

Articles created/expanded on July 23

Joseph Gotthardt

As Canções de Eu Tu Eles

Created by Jaespinoza (talk) 23:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC). Self nom at 23:18, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Nels Running

US Air Force Major General Nels Running

Created by PumpkinSky (talk). Self nom at 20:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: Orange Phelps PumpkinSky talk 20:20, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Just seems a bit more concise. Panyd 18:34, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Just added comma after Montana, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:12, 25 July 2011 (UTC)


Bitar Mansion

Bitar Mansion in June 2011 following neglect

Created by Another Believer (talk). Nominated by Jsayre64 (talk) at 19:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Article is new, well above the size threshold. Citations are fine, and no other issues barring a successful nomination can be found. I'd rather see more than two references but considering the specific topic, that would be hard to achieve. Nice article.--Tomobe03 (talk) 00:39, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
  • But the hook is far too boring. Sorry, but no one cares that a house was built and has rooms, and the particular numbers aren't anything extraordinary. If nothing interesting can be found to be say about this topic, then it shouldn't be featured. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
  • I see other problems as well. While I don't think it's enough to constitute plagiarism, there is a lot of uncomfortable close paraphrasing and adoption of simple phrases directly from the source (e.g., "waist-high grass", "half-finished security gates"). More importantly, I don't think this article even demonstrates notability. I haven't bothered to search other sources, but from what's presented in this article, the house has just been the subject of one news piece. rʨanaɢ (talk) 00:52, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
See here for more comments. --Jsayre64 (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Christ Church, Lancaster

Christ Church, Lancaster

Created by Peter I. Vardy (talk). Self nom at 16:58, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


Abarenicola pacifica

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 09:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Reviewed: The Child's Dream
It is in paragraph 2 of the "Biology" section. I have added an extra citation at the end of the sentence. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Thx! And you've written a very nice article, Cwmhiraeth! :) Rcej (Robert)talk 05:45, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Cited, good to go. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:53, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Broken Hill Massacre

Created by Curleighandmowe (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 08:57, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Some statements are unsourced (example, "an imam and a halal butcher"), Wikification may not be up to par. Spotchecking reveals that some sentences may be lifted wholesale from other sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Full reference information needs to be given (not just links and titles; when the links become dead, these references will be hard to locate). The link for the ABC reference is broken. rʨanaɢ (talk) 02:13, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Now I'm not sure if the article as written is eligible; it appears to have been copied from this website. Rcej (Robert)talk 05:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
No, that website was probably copied from here. It appears to be a Misplaced Pages mirror. rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Definite Misplaced Pages mirror. Article still needs some work before reaching the main page though. Article is possibly amalgamating information from different sources with slight paraphrasing. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
I've slightly edited the article, removed the dead ref, found another src and improved the citing. Rcej (Robert)talk 02:11, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Fontanellar gun

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self nom at 02:54, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Currently classified as a stub (although I disagree with that classification). Dare I say that this is another DYK inspired by Cracked.com? Either way, looks pretty good. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Reclassified as start class. And, yes, it was inspired by Cracked.com. Generally, the stuff on there already has articles on here, but it seems our coverage of termites is incredibly lacking. I mean, we don't even have a proper article on the North American Termite, which is why I directed it to the family name. Silverseren 20:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
Okay, looks good now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:22, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Earl Best

  • Promoted by Crisco 1492


Articles created/expanded on July 24

Toposa People, Nadapal, Narus, South Sudan

Hybrid Scorecard

Promoted by Sharktopus

A2 (Croatia)

Iain Blair

Architects of the United States Forest Service

  • Rejected by Crisco 1492

Scutellaria floridana

Nelson Story

Ronald Bodley

2003 Aceh New Years' Eve bombing

2004 Palopo cafe bombing, 2004 Poso bus bombing

Mely G. Tan

Human-Canine Bond

SS Eastern

Monarch Contemporary Art Center and Sculpture Park

Dudley Town, Cornwall, Connecticut

Articles created/expanded on July 25

Mike Keller

Ontario Highway 7A

Archived nomination

*Promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk): Template talk:Did you know/Ontario Highway 7A

Belle Mina

Acer douglasense

Babette Rosmond

Jerold Krieger

Trigonopterus oblongus

List of posthumous number-one singles (UK)

Herb Kawainui Kane

  • ALT1:... that Herb Kawainui Kane died on the 36th anniversary of the launch of the voyaging canoe he designed, Hōkūle‘a, an icon of the 1970s Hawaiian Renaissance?
  • Reviewed: Blanfordia
  • Comment: Character count is high if one counts the pipe necessary to have Hawaiian characters represented. If that is a problem, the alt version is consistent with the Misplaced Pages title style. But that would be unfortunate.

5x expanded by Alawa (talk). Self nom at 19:31, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:

Hook

Article

Comments/discussion:

Ayudhapurusha

Es ist das Heil uns kommen her, BWV 9

Leslie Flint

Articles created/expanded on July 26

Special occasion holding area

Please do not nominate new articles for a special time in this section. Instead, nominate them in the candidate entries section above, under the date the article was created or the expansion began, and indicate your request for a specially timed appearance on the main page.
Note: Articles nominated for a special occasion should be nominated (i) within five days of creation or expansion, as usual, and (ii) between five days and six weeks before the occasion, to give reviewers time to check the nomination. April Fools' Day is an exception to these requirements; see Misplaced Pages:April Fool's Main Page/Did You Know.


August 9

Virgin Islands dwarf sphaero

A Virgin Islands dwarf sphaero sits on a U.S. dime.

5x expanded by Visionholder (talk). Self nom at 01:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

August 17 (Indonesian Independence Day)

Bendera Pusaka

The flag Bendera Pusaka is raised on 17 August 1945

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 02:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Gugur Bunga, Ismail Marzuki

Ismail Marzuki playing the piano

Created by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 14:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Prime Ministers of Indonesia

Official picture of Sukarno

5x expanded by Crisco 1492 (talk). Self nom at 07:11, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

  • Of the two sources used to support the hook information, one calls Sukarno a prime minister, but the other does not include him in a list of prime ministers of Indonesia. Neither source (nor the article) actually says he was the last prime minister; he is simply the last one in the nominated aricle's table. A hook fact must be supported by a citation. In any case, the article is "new" (more than 5x expanded) and is now of adequate length. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:00, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


ALT1 ... that Sukarno (pictured) considered himself one of the Prime Ministers of Indonesia?
ALT1 better? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Or ALT2: ... that President Sukarno (pictured) also considered himself one of the Prime Ministers of Indonesia? Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

See also

Category:
Template talk:Did you know Add topic