Misplaced Pages

:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Arbitration | Requests

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathsci (talk | contribs) at 21:30, 9 August 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:30, 9 August 2011 by Mathsci (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Arbitration Committee proceedings Case requests

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

Open cases
Case name Links Evidence due Prop. Dec. due
Palestine-Israel articles 5 (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) 21 Dec 2024 11 Jan 2025
Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests
Request name Motions  Case Posted
] none none 9 August 2011
Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

Requests for clarification

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification/Header

Request for clarification: {Link to case or username}

Initiated by Mathsci (talk) at 21:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

List of any users involved or directly affected, and confirmation that all are aware of the request:


Statement by Mathsci

Miradre is under a three month topic ban under WP:ARBR&I and appears to have borken that ban by editing to close to the limits. I have filed a report at WP:AE. Captain Occam, who is subject to a very general topic ban which I would precludes his involving himself in such reauests, has added comments there claiming to be uninvolved. This appears to break his topic ban. He has used the occasion to launch an attack on me. I am not under any ArbCom restrictions. Captin Occam, however,ut seems to have broken the terms of his topic ban and appears to be abusing the arbitration enforcement page. I am reporting this here because it seems so anomolous. Pease could ArbCom clarify whether this is within the sanctions which form part of his topic ban. There is also the issue of the two confirmed meatpuppets of Captain Occam and Ferahgo the Assassin, SightWatcher and TrevelyanL85A2, who since the topic bans appear to have been editing on behalf of the topic banned users. Their real life identities have been confirmed to ArbCom at the start of the year. SightWatcher has made similar complaints to Captain Occam. Several users, including administrators, have raised doubts about three further accounts that have appeared since the topic ban, editing exclusively in the area of the topic ban. Mathsci (talk) 21:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Statement by other user

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

Arbitrator views and discussion


Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment Add topic