Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/RAF Uxbridge/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) at 03:03, 9 November 2011 (fix, should have been a new nomination). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:03, 9 November 2011 by SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) (fix, should have been a new nomination)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

RAF Uxbridge

RAF Uxbridge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Harrison49 (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Corrected for new nomination SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:03, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Support', based on prose and thoroughness of referencing (spotchecks not done). However, I noticed an issue with "... the 1969 film Battle of Britain were photographed in the 11 Group Operations Room, ..." Photographed seems odd as it implies that they were stills; if it was actual film, why not "shot" instead? Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Also, as a suggestion, perhaps making the short references linked to the correct entry in the bibliography using something like {{harv}} family of templates would make more it user-friendly. Citation style, as long as it is consistent, isn't a criteria so this is just a suggestion. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll look into that. Also, thanks for spotting the mistake with the Battle of Britain filming. I think it had been changed during a copyedit. Harrison49 (talk) 23:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/RAF Uxbridge/archive1 Add topic