This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) at 17:45, 26 July 2012 (→WP:RSOPINION and William Connolley: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:45, 26 July 2012 by NuclearWarfare (talk | contribs) (→WP:RSOPINION and William Connolley: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Please click here to leave me a new message.Template:Archive box collapsible
Edit warring
In case you did not know, it is never OK to reintroduce an edit into an article multiple times, after it has been objected to by multiple people, as you did here: Doing so is considered edit warring, and is against policy. This is especially true for BLPs, as we must be extremely circumspect about what we say about living persons. Additionally, I would like to inform you that it is against policy for an editor to revert more than 3 times in 24 hours. This is called the 3 revert rule and is a bright line that should not be crossed. LK (talk) 04:28, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
WP:RSOPINION and William Connolley
Hi there. I noticed your edit here. First off, if you aren't aware of the policy already, I would like to let you know about Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Standard discretionary sanctions. Second (though related of course), I would like you to explain how your above edit is acceptable as per our standards on the use of opinion pieces as a source in biographies of living persons. Best, NW (Talk) 17:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)