Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 86.42.159.227 (talk) at 07:05, 1 September 2012 (→Support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Keelan717

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (2/0/0); Scheduled to end 06:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination

Keelan717 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) – Loyal, honest, trustworthyKeelan717 (talk) 06:23, 1 September 2012

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Misplaced Pages as a bureaucrat. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?

A: I understand the criteria for a promotion to an administrator should be that the user should not have vandalised a page or article before and must have created at least one page with reliable information and sources.

2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?

A: I would contact another bureaucrat and get their opinion, which I would value, and make my decision.

3. Wikipedians expect bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?

A: I feel I am trustworthy because I have created many wikis on Wikia including Winx Club Wiki.

Additional question from Riley Huntley

1. A user requests adminship but has less than 25 edits, would you support or oppose?

A: I would go neutral.

2. A user requests bureaucrat but made the request in the RfA section, what would you do?

A: I would leave a message in their talk and tell them how to put it in the RfB section.

General comments

• Links for Keelan717: Keelan717 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
• Edit summary usage for Keelan717 can be found here.

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Discussion

Support

1. I support this candidate
2. This candidate lacks proper experience but I support them nonetheless.

Oppose

Neutral